<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://models.pbl.nl/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Bouwmanl</id>
	<title>IMAGE - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://models.pbl.nl/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Bouwmanl"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/image/Special:Contributions/Bouwmanl"/>
	<updated>2026-05-02T04:53:07Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.15</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Policy_issues&amp;diff=27689</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Policy issues</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Policy_issues&amp;diff=27689"/>
		<updated>2016-11-04T10:49:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentPolicyIssueTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Under baseline scenarios of IMAGE-GNM, N surpluses generally increase. For example, in the Rio+20 baseline scenario, the N surplus increases by 35% globally in the period 2002-2050 (the figure below). This is the result of decreasing trends in North America, Western Europe and Japan as a result of increasing nutrient use efficiency, and stabilisation in India. In all other regions, N surpluses increase, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeastern Asia as a result of increasing fertilizer use to halt soil nutrient depletion (the figure below). The situation is similar for P, with large increases in developing countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No scenarios have been implemented yet with the full IMAGE-GNM. However, results for the 20th century show that the global river N export (19 to 37 Tg/yr, or +90%) increased faster than P export (2 to 4 Tg/yr or +75%). The increase in export by rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (3.7 to 14.7 Tg N/yr, increase by a factor of 4; 0.6 to 1.6 Tg P per year, factor of 1.5) and Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (0.9 to 2.1 Tg N/yr, +126%; 0.2 to 0.4 Tg P yr/yr, +80% ) was much faster than in other parts of the world (the figure below). The increase in P export was smaller than that of N in world regions. The differential increase of N and P explains the increase in the N:P ratio in rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (13 to 20), Indian Ocean (14 to 18 since 1970), Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (10 to 13). There was no clear increase in the regions draining into the Atlantic Ocean.&lt;br /&gt;
|Example=Economic developments and policy interventions may modify individual terms in the soil nutrient budget (Formula 1, [[Nutrients/Description|Model description part]]), and the fate of nutrients in the environment. For example, agricultural demand (Component [[Agricultural economy]]) affects:&lt;br /&gt;
* production of leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) and biological N fixation as a consequence;&lt;br /&gt;
* meat and milk production and thus animal manure production;&lt;br /&gt;
* crop production and fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IMAGE soil nutrient model includes options to reduce nutrient surpluses in agriculture or nutrients in wastewater, and strategies to improve resource use efficiency. Wastewater strategies that can be assessed with tools available in the nutrient model of IMAGE include:&lt;br /&gt;
* Increasing access to improved sanitation and connection to sewerage systems;&lt;br /&gt;
* Construction of wastewater treatment plants;&lt;br /&gt;
* Substituting synthetic fertilisers with fertilisers produced from human excreta. This option has no consequences for nutrient budgets, but reduces wastewater flows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IMAGE also addresses strategies for reducing nutrient surpluses in agriculture, including the five options illustrated in the figure below:&lt;br /&gt;
* Extensification (EX), assuming for example that 10% of ruminant production in mixed and industrial systems shifts to pastoral production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased feed conversion efficiency (FE), assuming for example 10% reduction in N and P excretion for cattle, pigs, poultry and small ruminants in mixed and industrial systems. This is achieved by increasing the use of concentrates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved manure storage systems (ST), considering for example 20% lower NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions from animal housing and storage systems. This means that the animal manure used for spreading contains 5% more N than under the baseline scenario.&lt;br /&gt;
* Integrated manure management (IM) where, for example, all manure under the baseline scenario ends up outside the agricultural system (e.g., manure used as fuel, see the figure above) and is recycled in crop systems to substitute fertiliser. In addition, integration of animal manure in crop systems is improved, particularly in industrialised countries. &lt;br /&gt;
* Dietary changes (DI), for example, assume that by 2050, 10% of beef consumption under the baseline scenarios is replaced by poultry meat in all producing regions, without accounting for changes in agricultural trade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Extensification, increased feed efficiency and reduced ammonia emissions from stables (cases EX, FE and ST) have minor effects on the global soil N budget (the figure below). However, better integration of animal manure in crop production systems (IM), primarily in industrialised countries, and a change in the human diet with poultry replacing ruminant meat (DI) would have major effects on the global soil N budget. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other options that can be assessed using scenario variables from other parts of IMAGE include: &lt;br /&gt;
* Consequences of changes in crop production systems, such as increasing crop yields, that would improve fertiliser use efficiency;&lt;br /&gt;
* Consequences of changes in livestock production systems such as better management leading to lower excretion rates;&lt;br /&gt;
* Changes in the distribution of total production between mixed and pastoral systems;&lt;br /&gt;
* Changing human diets leading to changing production volumes.&lt;br /&gt;
See  also Policy interventions Table below&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Policy_issues&amp;diff=27609</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Policy issues</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Policy_issues&amp;diff=27609"/>
		<updated>2016-11-03T08:46:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentPolicyIssueTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Under baseline scenarios of IMAGE-GNM, N surpluses generally increase. For example, in the Rio+20 baseline scenario, the N surplus increases by 35% globally in the period 2002-2050 (the figure below). This is the result of decreasing trends in North America, Western Europe and Japan as a result of increasing nutrient use efficiency, and stabilisation in India. In all other regions, N surpluses increase, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeastern Asia as a result of increasing fertilizer use to halt soil nutrient depletion (the figure below). The situation is similar for P, with large increases in developing countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No scenarios have been implemented yet with the full IMAGE-GNM. However, results for the 20th century show that the global river N export (19 to 37 Tg/yr, or +90%) increased faster than P export (2 to 4 Tg/yr or +75%). The increase in export by rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (3.7 to 14.7 Tg N/yr, increase by a factor of 4; 0.6 to 1.6 Tg P per year, factor of 1.5) and Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (0.9 to 2.1 Tg N/yr, +126%; 0.2 to 0.4 Tg P yr-1, +80% ) was much faster than in other parts of the world (the figure below). The increase in P export was smaller than that of N in world regions. The differential increase of N and P explains the increase in the N:P ratio in rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (13 to 20), Indian Ocean (14 to 18 since 1970), Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (10 to 13). There was no clear increase in the regions draining into the Atlantic Ocean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DisplayFigureTemplate|&amp;lt;Figure baseline_nutrients&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
|Example=Economic developments and policy interventions may modify individual terms in the soil nutrient budget (Formula 1, [[Nutrients/Description|Model description part]]), and the fate of nutrients in the environment. For example, agricultural demand (Component [[Agricultural economy]]) affects:&lt;br /&gt;
* production of leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) and biological N fixation as a consequence;&lt;br /&gt;
* meat and milk production and thus animal manure production;&lt;br /&gt;
* crop production and fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IMAGE soil nutrient model includes options to reduce nutrient surpluses in agriculture or nutrients in wastewater, and strategies to improve resource use efficiency. Wastewater strategies that can be assessed with tools available in the nutrient model of IMAGE include:&lt;br /&gt;
* Increasing access to improved sanitation and connection to sewerage systems;&lt;br /&gt;
* Construction of wastewater treatment plants;&lt;br /&gt;
* Substituting synthetic fertilisers with fertilisers produced from human excreta. This option has no consequences for nutrient budgets, but reduces wastewater flows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IMAGE also addresses strategies for reducing nutrient surpluses in agriculture, including the five options illustrated in the figure below:&lt;br /&gt;
* Extensification (EX), assuming for example that 10% of ruminant production in mixed and industrial systems shifts to pastoral production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased feed conversion efficiency (FE), assuming for example 10% reduction in N and P excretion for cattle, pigs, poultry and small ruminants in mixed and industrial systems. This is achieved by increasing the use of concentrates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved manure storage systems (ST), considering for example 20% lower NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions from animal housing and storage systems. This means that the animal manure used for spreading contains 5% more N than under the baseline scenario.&lt;br /&gt;
* Integrated manure management (IM) where, for example, all manure under the baseline scenario ends up outside the agricultural system (e.g., manure used as fuel, see the figure above) and is recycled in crop systems to substitute fertiliser. In addition, integration of animal manure in crop systems is improved, particularly in industrialised countries. &lt;br /&gt;
* Dietary changes (DI), for example, assume that by 2050, 10% of beef consumption under the baseline scenarios is replaced by poultry meat in all producing regions, without accounting for changes in agricultural trade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Extensification, increased feed efficiency and reduced ammonia emissions from stables (cases EX, FE and ST) have minor effects on the global soil N budget (the figure below). However, better integration of animal manure in crop production systems (IM), primarily in industrialised countries, and a change in the human diet with poultry replacing ruminant meat (DI) would have major effects on the global soil N budget. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other options that can be assessed using scenario variables from other parts of IMAGE include: &lt;br /&gt;
* Consequences of changes in crop production systems, such as increasing crop yields, that would improve fertiliser use efficiency;&lt;br /&gt;
* Consequences of changes in livestock production systems such as better management leading to lower excretion rates;&lt;br /&gt;
* Changes in the distribution of total production between mixed and pastoral systems;&lt;br /&gt;
* Changing human diets leading to changing production volumes.&lt;br /&gt;
See  also Policy interventions Table below&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Policy_issues&amp;diff=27608</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Policy issues</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Policy_issues&amp;diff=27608"/>
		<updated>2016-11-03T08:44:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentPolicyIssueTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Under baseline scenarios of IMAGE-GNM, N surpluses generally increase. For example, in the Rio+20 baseline scenario, the N surplus increases by 35% globally in the period 2002-2050 (the figure below). This is the result of decreasing trends in North America, Western Europe and Japan as a result of increasing nutrient use efficiency, and stabilisation in India. In all other regions, N surpluses increase, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeastern Asia as a result of increasing fertilizer use to halt soil nutrient depletion (the figure below). The situation is similar for P, with large increases in developing countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No scenarios have been implemented yet with the full IMAGE-GNM. However, results for the 20th century show that the global river N export (19 to 37 Tg/yr, or +90%) increased faster than P export (2 to 4 Tg/yr or +75%). The increase in export by rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (3.7 to 14.7 Tg N/yr, increase by a factor of 4; 0.6 to 1.6 Tg P per year, factor of 1.5) and Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (0.9 to 2.1 Tg N/yr, +126%; 0.2 to 0.4 Tg P yr-1, +80% ) was much faster than in other parts of the world (the figure below). The increase in P export was smaller than that of N in world regions. The differential increase of N and P explains the increase in the N:P ratio in rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (13 to 20), Indian Ocean (14 to 18 since 1970), Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (10 to 13). There was no clear increase in the regions draining into the Atlantic Ocean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DisplayFigurelTemplate|&amp;lt;Figure baseline_nutrients&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
|Example=Economic developments and policy interventions may modify individual terms in the soil nutrient budget (Formula 1, [[Nutrients/Description|Model description part]]), and the fate of nutrients in the environment. For example, agricultural demand (Component [[Agricultural economy]]) affects:&lt;br /&gt;
* production of leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) and biological N fixation as a consequence;&lt;br /&gt;
* meat and milk production and thus animal manure production;&lt;br /&gt;
* crop production and fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IMAGE soil nutrient model includes options to reduce nutrient surpluses in agriculture or nutrients in wastewater, and strategies to improve resource use efficiency. Wastewater strategies that can be assessed with tools available in the nutrient model of IMAGE include:&lt;br /&gt;
* Increasing access to improved sanitation and connection to sewerage systems;&lt;br /&gt;
* Construction of wastewater treatment plants;&lt;br /&gt;
* Substituting synthetic fertilisers with fertilisers produced from human excreta. This option has no consequences for nutrient budgets, but reduces wastewater flows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IMAGE also addresses strategies for reducing nutrient surpluses in agriculture, including the five options illustrated in the figure below:&lt;br /&gt;
* Extensification (EX), assuming for example that 10% of ruminant production in mixed and industrial systems shifts to pastoral production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased feed conversion efficiency (FE), assuming for example 10% reduction in N and P excretion for cattle, pigs, poultry and small ruminants in mixed and industrial systems. This is achieved by increasing the use of concentrates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved manure storage systems (ST), considering for example 20% lower NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions from animal housing and storage systems. This means that the animal manure used for spreading contains 5% more N than under the baseline scenario.&lt;br /&gt;
* Integrated manure management (IM) where, for example, all manure under the baseline scenario ends up outside the agricultural system (e.g., manure used as fuel, see the figure above) and is recycled in crop systems to substitute fertiliser. In addition, integration of animal manure in crop systems is improved, particularly in industrialised countries. &lt;br /&gt;
* Dietary changes (DI), for example, assume that by 2050, 10% of beef consumption under the baseline scenarios is replaced by poultry meat in all producing regions, without accounting for changes in agricultural trade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Extensification, increased feed efficiency and reduced ammonia emissions from stables (cases EX, FE and ST) have minor effects on the global soil N budget (the figure below). However, better integration of animal manure in crop production systems (IM), primarily in industrialised countries, and a change in the human diet with poultry replacing ruminant meat (DI) would have major effects on the global soil N budget. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other options that can be assessed using scenario variables from other parts of IMAGE include: &lt;br /&gt;
* Consequences of changes in crop production systems, such as increasing crop yields, that would improve fertiliser use efficiency;&lt;br /&gt;
* Consequences of changes in livestock production systems such as better management leading to lower excretion rates;&lt;br /&gt;
* Changes in the distribution of total production between mixed and pastoral systems;&lt;br /&gt;
* Changing human diets leading to changing production volumes.&lt;br /&gt;
See  also Policy interventions Table below&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Policy_issues&amp;diff=27606</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Policy issues</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Policy_issues&amp;diff=27606"/>
		<updated>2016-11-03T08:36:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentPolicyIssueTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Under baseline scenarios of IMAGE-GNM, N surpluses generally increase. For example, in the Rio+20 baseline scenario, the N surplus increases by 35% globally in the period 2002-2050 (the figure below). This is the result of decreasing trends in North America, Western Europe and Japan as a result of increasing nutrient use efficiency, and stabilisation in India. In all other regions, N surpluses increase, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeastern Asia as a result of increasing fertilizer use to halt soil nutrient depletion (the figure below). The situation is similar for P, with large increases in developing countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IMAGE-GNM results for the 20th century show that the global river N export (19 to 37 Tg/yr, or +90%) increased faster than P export (2 to 4 Tg/yr or +75%). The increase in export by rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (3.7 to 14.7 Tg N/yr, increase by a factor of 4; 0.6 to 1.6 Tg P per year, factor of 1.5) and Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (0.9 to 2.1 Tg N/yr, +126%; 0.2 to 0.4 Tg P yr-1, +80% ) was much faster than in other parts of the world (the figure below). The increase in P export was smaller than that of N in world regions. The differential increase of N and P explains the increase in the N:P ratio in rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (13 to 20), Indian Ocean (14 to 18 since 1970), Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (10 to 13). There was no clear increase in the regions draining into the Atlantic Ocean.&lt;br /&gt;
{{DisplayFigureLeftOptimalTemplate|&amp;lt;Figure baseline_nutrients&amp;gt;|plain}}&lt;br /&gt;
|Example=Economic developments and policy interventions may modify individual terms in the soil nutrient budget (Formula 1, [[Nutrients/Description|Model description part]]), and the fate of nutrients in the environment. For example, agricultural demand (Component [[Agricultural economy]]) affects:&lt;br /&gt;
* production of leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) and biological N fixation as a consequence;&lt;br /&gt;
* meat and milk production and thus animal manure production;&lt;br /&gt;
* crop production and fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IMAGE soil nutrient model includes options to reduce nutrient surpluses in agriculture or nutrients in wastewater, and strategies to improve resource use efficiency. Wastewater strategies that can be assessed with tools available in the nutrient model of IMAGE include:&lt;br /&gt;
* Increasing access to improved sanitation and connection to sewerage systems;&lt;br /&gt;
* Construction of wastewater treatment plants;&lt;br /&gt;
* Substituting synthetic fertilisers with fertilisers produced from human excreta. This option has no consequences for nutrient budgets, but reduces wastewater flows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IMAGE also addresses strategies for reducing nutrient surpluses in agriculture, including the five options illustrated in the figure below:&lt;br /&gt;
* Extensification (EX), assuming for example that 10% of ruminant production in mixed and industrial systems shifts to pastoral production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased feed conversion efficiency (FE), assuming for example 10% reduction in N and P excretion for cattle, pigs, poultry and small ruminants in mixed and industrial systems. This is achieved by increasing the use of concentrates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved manure storage systems (ST), considering for example 20% lower NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions from animal housing and storage systems. This means that the animal manure used for spreading contains 5% more N than under the baseline scenario.&lt;br /&gt;
* Integrated manure management (IM) where, for example, all manure under the baseline scenario ends up outside the agricultural system (e.g., manure used as fuel, see the figure above) and is recycled in crop systems to substitute fertiliser. In addition, integration of animal manure in crop systems is improved, particularly in industrialised countries. &lt;br /&gt;
* Dietary changes (DI), for example, assume that by 2050, 10% of beef consumption under the baseline scenarios is replaced by poultry meat in all producing regions, without accounting for changes in agricultural trade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Extensification, increased feed efficiency and reduced ammonia emissions from stables (cases EX, FE and ST) have minor effects on the global soil N budget (the figure below). However, better integration of animal manure in crop production systems (IM), primarily in industrialised countries, and a change in the human diet with poultry replacing ruminant meat (DI) would have major effects on the global soil N budget. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other options that can be assessed using scenario variables from other parts of IMAGE include: &lt;br /&gt;
* Consequences of changes in crop production systems, such as increasing crop yields, that would improve fertiliser use efficiency;&lt;br /&gt;
* Consequences of changes in livestock production systems such as better management leading to lower excretion rates;&lt;br /&gt;
* Changes in the distribution of total production between mixed and pastoral systems;&lt;br /&gt;
* Changing human diets leading to changing production volumes.&lt;br /&gt;
See  also Policy interventions Table below&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Policy_issues&amp;diff=27604</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Policy issues</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Policy_issues&amp;diff=27604"/>
		<updated>2016-11-03T08:30:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentPolicyIssueTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Under baseline scenarios of IMAGE-GNM, N surpluses generally increase. For example, in the Rio+20 baseline scenario, the N surplus increases by 35% globally in the period 2002-2050 (the figure below). This is the result of decreasing trends in North America, Western Europe and Japan as a result of increasing nutrient use efficiency, and stabilisation in India. In all other regions, N surpluses increase, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeastern Asia as a result of increasing fertilizer use to halt soil nutrient depletion (the figure below). The situation is similar for P, with large increases in developing countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No scenarios have been implemented yet, but IMAGE-GNM results for the 20th century show that the global river N export (19 to 37 Tg/yr, or +90%) showed a faster increase than P export (2 to 4 Tg/yr or +75%). The increase in export by rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (3.7 to 14.7 Tg N/yr, increase by a factor of 4; 0.6 to 1.6 Tg P/yr, factor of 1.5) and Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (0.9 to 2.1 Tg N/yr, +126%; 0.2 to 0.4 Tg P per year, +80% ) was much faster than in other parts of the world (the figure below). The increase in P export was smaller than that of N in world regions. The differential increase of N and P explains the increase in the N:P ratio in rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (13 to 20), Indian Ocean (14 to 18 since 1970), Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (10 to 13). There was no clear increase in the regions draining into the Atlantic Ocean.&lt;br /&gt;
{{DisplayFigureLeftOptimalTemplate|&amp;lt;Figure baseline_nutrients&amp;gt;|plain}}&lt;br /&gt;
|Example=Economic developments and policy interventions may modify individual terms in the soil nutrient budget (Formula 1, [[Nutrients/Description|Model description part]]), and the fate of nutrients in the environment. For example, agricultural demand (Component [[Agricultural economy]]) affects:&lt;br /&gt;
* production of leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) and biological N fixation as a consequence;&lt;br /&gt;
* meat and milk production and thus animal manure production;&lt;br /&gt;
* crop production and fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IMAGE soil nutrient model includes options to reduce nutrient surpluses in agriculture or nutrients in wastewater, and strategies to improve resource use efficiency. Wastewater strategies that can be assessed with tools available in the nutrient model of IMAGE include:&lt;br /&gt;
* Increasing access to improved sanitation and connection to sewerage systems;&lt;br /&gt;
* Construction of wastewater treatment plants;&lt;br /&gt;
* Substituting synthetic fertilisers with fertilisers produced from human excreta. This option has no consequences for nutrient budgets, but reduces wastewater flows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IMAGE also addresses strategies for reducing nutrient surpluses in agriculture, including the five options illustrated in the figure below:&lt;br /&gt;
* Extensification (EX), assuming for example that 10% of ruminant production in mixed and industrial systems shifts to pastoral production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased feed conversion efficiency (FE), assuming for example 10% reduction in N and P excretion for cattle, pigs, poultry and small ruminants in mixed and industrial systems. This is achieved by increasing the use of concentrates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved manure storage systems (ST), considering for example 20% lower NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions from animal housing and storage systems. This means that the animal manure used for spreading contains 5% more N than under the baseline scenario.&lt;br /&gt;
* Integrated manure management (IM) where, for example, all manure under the baseline scenario ends up outside the agricultural system (e.g., manure used as fuel, see the figure above) and is recycled in crop systems to substitute fertiliser. In addition, integration of animal manure in crop systems is improved, particularly in industrialised countries. &lt;br /&gt;
* Dietary changes (DI), for example, assume that by 2050, 10% of beef consumption under the baseline scenarios is replaced by poultry meat in all producing regions, without accounting for changes in agricultural trade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Extensification, increased feed efficiency and reduced ammonia emissions from stables (cases EX, FE and ST) have minor effects on the global soil N budget (the figure below). However, better integration of animal manure in crop production systems (IM), primarily in industrialised countries, and a change in the human diet with poultry replacing ruminant meat (DI) would have major effects on the global soil N budget. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other options that can be assessed using scenario variables from other parts of IMAGE include: &lt;br /&gt;
* Consequences of changes in crop production systems, such as increasing crop yields, that would improve fertiliser use efficiency;&lt;br /&gt;
* Consequences of changes in livestock production systems such as better management leading to lower excretion rates;&lt;br /&gt;
* Changes in the distribution of total production between mixed and pastoral systems;&lt;br /&gt;
* Changing human diets leading to changing production volumes.&lt;br /&gt;
See  also Policy interventions Table below&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Policy_issues&amp;diff=27603</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Policy issues</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Policy_issues&amp;diff=27603"/>
		<updated>2016-11-03T08:27:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentPolicyIssueTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Under baseline scenarios of IMAGE, N surpluses generally increase. For example, in the Rio+20 baseline scenario, the N surplus increases by 35% globally in the period 2002-2050 (the figure below). This is the result of decreasing trends in North America, Western Europe and Japan as a result of increasing nutrient use efficiency, and stabilisation in India. In all other regions, N surpluses increase, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeastern Asia as a result of increasing fertilizer use to halt soil nutrient depletion (the figure below). The situation is similar for P, with large increases in developing countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No scenarios have been implemented yet, but IMAGE-GNM results for the 20th century show that the global river N export (19 to 37 Tg/yr, or +90%) showed a faster increase than P export (2 to 4 Tg/yr or +75%). The increase in export by rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (3.7 to 14.7 Tg N/yr, increase by a factor of 4; 0.6 to 1.6 Tg P/yr, factor of 1.5) and Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (0.9 to 2.1 Tg N/yr, +126%; 0.2 to 0.4 Tg P per year, +80% ) was much faster than in other parts of the world (the figure below). The increase in P export was smaller than that of N in world regions. The differential increase of N and P explains the increase in the N:P ratio in rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (13 to 20), Indian Ocean (14 to 18 since 1970), Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (10 to 13). There was no clear increase in the regions draining into the Atlantic Ocean (Figure SI5).&lt;br /&gt;
{{DisplayFigureLeftOptimalTemplate|&amp;lt;Figure baseline_nutrients&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
|Example=Economic developments and policy interventions may modify individual terms in the soil nutrient budget (Formula 1, [[Nutrients/Description|Model description part]]), and the fate of nutrients in the environment. For example, agricultural demand (Component [[Agricultural economy]]) affects:&lt;br /&gt;
* production of leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) and biological N fixation as a consequence;&lt;br /&gt;
* meat and milk production and thus animal manure production;&lt;br /&gt;
* crop production and fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IMAGE soil nutrient model includes options to reduce nutrient surpluses in agriculture or nutrients in wastewater, and strategies to improve resource use efficiency. Wastewater strategies that can be assessed with tools available in the nutrient model of IMAGE include:&lt;br /&gt;
* Increasing access to improved sanitation and connection to sewerage systems;&lt;br /&gt;
* Construction of wastewater treatment plants;&lt;br /&gt;
* Substituting synthetic fertilisers with fertilisers produced from human excreta. This option has no consequences for nutrient budgets, but reduces wastewater flows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IMAGE also addresses strategies for reducing nutrient surpluses in agriculture, including the five options illustrated in the figure below:&lt;br /&gt;
* Extensification (EX), assuming for example that 10% of ruminant production in mixed and industrial systems shifts to pastoral production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased feed conversion efficiency (FE), assuming for example 10% reduction in N and P excretion for cattle, pigs, poultry and small ruminants in mixed and industrial systems. This is achieved by increasing the use of concentrates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved manure storage systems (ST), considering for example 20% lower NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions from animal housing and storage systems. This means that the animal manure used for spreading contains 5% more N than under the baseline scenario.&lt;br /&gt;
* Integrated manure management (IM) where, for example, all manure under the baseline scenario ends up outside the agricultural system (e.g., manure used as fuel, see the figure above) and is recycled in crop systems to substitute fertiliser. In addition, integration of animal manure in crop systems is improved, particularly in industrialised countries. &lt;br /&gt;
* Dietary changes (DI), for example, assume that by 2050, 10% of beef consumption under the baseline scenarios is replaced by poultry meat in all producing regions, without accounting for changes in agricultural trade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Extensification, increased feed efficiency and reduced ammonia emissions from stables (cases EX, FE and ST) have minor effects on the global soil N budget (the figure below). However, better integration of animal manure in crop production systems (IM), primarily in industrialised countries, and a change in the human diet with poultry replacing ruminant meat (DI) would have major effects on the global soil N budget. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other options that can be assessed using scenario variables from other parts of IMAGE include: &lt;br /&gt;
* Consequences of changes in crop production systems, such as increasing crop yields, that would improve fertiliser use efficiency;&lt;br /&gt;
* Consequences of changes in livestock production systems such as better management leading to lower excretion rates;&lt;br /&gt;
* Changes in the distribution of total production between mixed and pastoral systems;&lt;br /&gt;
* Changing human diets leading to changing production volumes.&lt;br /&gt;
See  also Policy interventions Table below&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=File:Figure_baseline_nutrients.png&amp;diff=27601</id>
		<title>File:Figure baseline nutrients.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=File:Figure_baseline_nutrients.png&amp;diff=27601"/>
		<updated>2016-11-03T08:09:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: River export of N and P to coastal marine ecosystems for rivers discharging in the Arctic Ocean, Atlantic Ocean, Indian Ocean, Pacific Ocean and Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea for the 20th century.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;River export of N and P to coastal marine ecosystems for rivers discharging in the Arctic Ocean, Atlantic Ocean, Indian Ocean, Pacific Ocean and Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea for the 20th century.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27597</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Description</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27597"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T13:27:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Van Drecht et al., 2009; Cleveland et al., 1999; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description====General===&lt;br /&gt;
The IMAGE-Global Nutrient Model (GNM) is a global distributed spatially explicit model using hydrology as the basis for describing nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) delivery to surface water and transport and in-stream retention in rivers, lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. IMAGE-GNM is coupled to the PCR-GLOBWB global hydrological model ([[Van Beek et al. 2011]]). In the IMAGE-GNM model, grid cells receive water with dissolved and suspended N and P from upstream grid cells; inside grid cells, N and P are delivered to water bodies via diffuse sources (surface runoff, shallow and deep groundwater, riparian zones; litterfall in floodplains; atmospheric deposition) and point sources (wastewater); N and P retention in a water body is calculated on the basis of the residence time of the water and nutrient uptake velocity; subsequently, water and nutrients are transported to downstream grid cells. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wastewater===&lt;br /&gt;
Urban wastewater contains N and P emitted by households and industries that are connected to a sewerage system, and households with sanitation but without a sewerage connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N discharges to surface water (&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;sw&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; in kg per person per year) are calculated as follows ([[Van Drecht et al., 2009]]; [[Morée et al., 2013]]):{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula1 Nutrients}}where:  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hum&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is human N emissions (kg per person per year), &lt;br /&gt;
* D is the proportion of the total population connected to public sewerage systems (no dimension), &lt;br /&gt;
*R N is the overall removal of N through wastewater treatment (no dimension). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total P emissions to surface water are calculated in a similar way, but also include estimates of P emissions to surface water resulting from the use of P-based dishwasher and laundry detergents. Nutrient removal by wastewater treatment R is based on the relative contribution of four classes of treatment (none, primary, secondary and tertiary treatment). D is calculated from the proportion of households with improved sanitation. D and R by treatment class are scenario variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil nutrient budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The soil budget approach ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]) considers all N and P inputs and outputs for IMAGE grid cells. N input terms in the budgets include application of synthetic N fertiliser (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fert&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and animal manure (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;man&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), biological N fixation (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fix&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), and atmospheric N deposition (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dep&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Output terms include N withdrawal from the field through crop harvesting, hay and grass cutting, and grass consumed by grazing animals (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;withdr&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soil N budget (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;budget&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is calculated as follows:{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula2 Nutrients}}  &lt;br /&gt;
The same approach is used for P, with input terms being animal manure and fertiliser. The soil nutrient budget does not include nutrient accumulation in soil organic matter for a positive budget (surplus), or nutrient depletion due to soil organic matter decomposition and mineralisation. With no accumulation, a surplus represents a potential loss to the environment. For N this includes NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation (see Component [[Emissions]]), denitrification, surface runoff and leaching. For P, this is surface runoff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For spatial allocation of the nutrient input to IMAGE grid cells, grass and the crop groups in IMAGE (temperate cereals, rice, maize, tropical cereals, pulses, roots and tubers, oil crops, other crops, energy crops) and grass are aggregated to five broad groups. These groups are grass, wetland rice, leguminous crops, other upland crops and energy crops for both mixed and pastoral production systems (see [[Livestock systems]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertiliser====&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser use is based on nutrient use efficiency, representing crop production in kilograms of dry matter per kilogram of fertiliser N (NUE) and P (PUE). NUE and PUE vary between countries because of differences in crop mix, attainable yield potential, soil quality, amount and form of N and P application and management. In constructing scenarios on fertiliser use, data on the 1970–2005 period serve as a guide to distinguish countries with an input exceeding crop uptake (positive budget or surplus) from countries with a deficit. Generally, farmers in countries with a surplus are assumed to be increasingly efficient in fertiliser use (increasing NUE and PUE). In countries with nutrient deficits, an increase in crop yields is only possible with an increase in the nutrient input. Initially, this will lead to decreasing NUE and PUE, showing a decrease in soil nutrient depletion due to increased fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Manure====&lt;br /&gt;
Total manure production is computed from animal stocks and N and P excretion rates (Figure Flowchart, middle). IMAGE uses constant N and P excretion rates per head for dairy and non-dairy cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats, pigs, poultry, horses, asses, mules and camels. Constant excretion rates imply that the N and P excretion per unit of product decreases with increased milk and meat production per animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N and P in the manure for each animal category are spatially allocated to mixed and pastoral systems. In each country and system, the manure is distributed over three management systems: grazing; storage in animal housing and storage systems; and manure used outside the agricultural system for fuel or other purposes. The quantity of manure assigned to grazing is based on the proportion of grass in feed rations (Figure Flowchart, middle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stored animal manure available for cropland and grassland application includes all stored and collected manure, excluding ammonia volatilisation from animal houses and storage systems. In general, IMAGE assumes that 50% of available animal manure from storage systems is applied to arable land and the rest to grassland in industrialised countries. In most developing countries, 95% of the available manure is spread on croplands and 5% on grassland, thus accounting for the lower economic importance of grass compared to crops in these countries. In the European Union, maximum manure application rates are 170 to 250 kg N per ha , reflecting current regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation====&lt;br /&gt;
Data on biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) are obtained from the N in the harvested product (see nutrient withdrawal) following the approach of ([[Salvagiotti et al., 2008]]). Thus any change in the rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by legumes is the result of yield changes for pulses and soybeans. In addition to leguminous crops, IMAGE uses an annual rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation of 5 kg N per ha for non-leguminous crops and grass, and 25 kg N per ha for wetland rice. N fixation rates in natural ecosystems were based on the low estimates for areal coverage by legumes ([[Cleveland et al., 1999]]) as described by Bouwman et al. ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Atmospheric deposition==== &lt;br /&gt;
Deposition rates for historical and future years are calculated by scaling N deposition field for 2000 (obtained from atmospheric chemistry transport models), using emission inventories for the historical period and N gas emissions in the scenario considered. IMAGE does not include atmospheric P deposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrient withdrawal==== &lt;br /&gt;
Withdrawal of N and P in harvested products is calculated from regional crop production in IMAGE and the N and P content for each crop, which is aggregated to the broad crop categories (wetland rice, leguminous crops, upland crops and energy crops). IMAGE also accounts for uptake by fodder crops. N withdrawal through grass consumption and harvest is assumed to amount to 60% of all N input (manure, fertiliser, deposition, N fixation), excluding NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation. P withdrawal through grazing or grass cutting is calculated as a proportion of 87.5% of fertiliser and manure P input. The rest is assumed to be lost through surface runoff. In calculating spatially nutrient withdrawal, a procedure is used to downscale regional crop production data from IMAGE to country estimates for nutrient withdrawal based on distributions in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nutrient environmental fate===&lt;br /&gt;
Nutrient losses from the plant-soil system to the soil-hydrology system are calculated from the soil nutrient budgets ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]). For N, the budget is corrected for ammonia volatilisation from grazing animals and from fertiliser and manure spreading (see Component [[Emissions]]). P not taken up by plants is generally bound to soil particles, with the only loss pathway being surface runoff. N is more mobile and is transported via surface runoff and through soil, groundwater and riparian zones to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil denitrification and leaching====&lt;br /&gt;
Denitrification is calculated as a proportion of the soil N budget surplus based on the effect of temperature and residence time of water and nitrate in the root zone, and the effects of soil texture, soil drainage and soil organic carbon content. In a soil budget deficit, IMAGE assumes that denitrification does not occur. Leaching is the complement of the soil N budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Groundwater transport, surface runoff and denitrification====&lt;br /&gt;
Two groundwater subsystems are distinguished. One is the shallow groundwater system representing interflow and surface runoff for the upper 5 m of the saturated zone, with short travel times for the water to enter local surface water at short distances or to infiltrate the deep groundwater system. The other is the deep system with a thickness of 50 m with generally long travel times draining to larger streams and rivers. Deep groundwater is assumed to be absent in areas of non-permeable, consolidated rocks or in the presence of surface water. Denitrification during groundwater transport is based on the travel time and the half-life of nitrate. The half-life depends on the lithological class (1 year for schists and shales containing pyrite, 2 years for alluvial material, and 5 years for all other lithological classes). Flows of water and nitrate from shallow groundwater to riparian zones are assumed to be absent in areas with surface water bodies, where the flow is assumed to bypass riparian zones flowing directly to streams or rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denitrification in riparian areas====&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation of denitrification in riparian areas is similar to that in soils, but with two differences: &lt;br /&gt;
# a biologically active layer of 0.3 m thickness is assumed instead of 1 m for other soils; &lt;br /&gt;
# the approach includes the effect of pH on denitrification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrients from vegetation in floodplains====&lt;br /&gt;
NPP from the LPJ model [[Carbon cycle and natural vegetation]] for wetlands and floodplains are used. Part of annual NPP is assumed to be deposited in the water during flooding, and where flooding is temporary, the litter from preceeding periods is assumed to be available for transport in the flood water.  50% of total NPP is assumed to end in the surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Other direct sources of nutrients====&lt;br /&gt;
Other sources include aquaculture, weathering and atmospheric deposition. Deposition is from the same data as used for the land nutriënt budgets. Aquaculture is taken from data from two recent studies ([[Bouwman et al., 2011]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]), and weathering. The calculation of P release from weathering is based on a recent study ([[Hartmann et al., 2014]]) which uses the lithological classes distinguished by ([[Dürr et al., 2005]]). The lithological classes are available on a 5 by 5 minute resolution, hence the weighted average P concentration within each 0.5 by 0.5 degree grid cell is calculated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In-stream nutrient retention====&lt;br /&gt;
The water that enters streams and rivers through surface runoff and discharges from groundwater and riparian zones is routed through stream and river channels, and passes through lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. The history of the construction of reservoirs during the 20th century is based on data from ([[Lehner et al., 2011]]). The nutrient retention in each of these systems is calculated on the basis of the nutrient spiralling ecological concept, which is based on residence time and temperature as described in ([[Beusen et al., 2014]]; [[Beusen et al., 2015]]).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Data_uncertainties_limitations&amp;diff=27595</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Data uncertainties limitations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Data_uncertainties_limitations&amp;diff=27595"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T13:24:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDataUncertaintyAndLimitationsTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=OECD, 2012; FAO, 2012a; Beusen et al., 2008;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Data,  uncertainties and limitations&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Data===&lt;br /&gt;
The data stem from various parts of IMAGE, such as land cover, biomes, crop production and allocation, livestock, fertiliser use and nutrient excretion rates. Environmental data include temperature and precipitation, runoff, and soil properties (see Input/output Table [[Nutrients|Introduction part]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
External data are used in determining historical N excretion rates, manure spreading and fertiliser use efficiency, but their development in the future is a scenario assumption. Additional information used only in this section includes lithology, relief and slope of the terrain. Additional data used in the nutrient budget model include subnational data as used for the United States, India, Brazil and China. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Uncertainties===&lt;br /&gt;
With regard to uncertainties, the budget calculations and individual input terms for 2000 have been found to be in close agreement ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]) with detailed country estimates for the member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ([[OECD, 2012]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, uncertainty is larger for some budget terms than for others. Data on fertiliser use are more reliable than on N and P animal excretions, which are calculated from livestock data ([[FAO, 2012b]]) and excretion rates per animal category. Data on crop nutrient withdrawal are less certain than on crop production, because the withdrawal is calculated with fixed global nutrient contents of the harvested proportions of marketed crops. In addition to uncertainty in nutrient contents, major uncertainties arise from insufficient data, for instance, on crops that are not marketed and on the use of crop residues. This leads to major uncertainties about nutrient withdrawal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sensitivity analysis ([[Beusen et al., 2015]]) of global nutriënt transport model with data for the year 2000 showed that:&lt;br /&gt;
* runoff is a major factor for N and P delivery, retention and river export.&lt;br /&gt;
* Uptake velocity and all factors used to compute the subgrid in-stream retention are important for total in-stream retention and river export of both N and P&lt;br /&gt;
* Soil N budgets, wastewater and all factors determining litterfall in floodplains are important for N delivery to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
* For P the factors that determine the P content of the soil (soil P content and bulk density) are important factors for P delivery and river export.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sensitivities for the years 1900 and 1950 ([[Beusen et al., 2016]]) show that inputs from vegetation in floodplains (for N and P) and weathering (for P) are important in the first half of the 20th century, when human activites were not yet overshadowing natural sources of nutrients.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27594</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Description</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27594"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T13:23:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Van Drecht et al., 2009; Cleveland et al., 1999; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description====General===&lt;br /&gt;
The IMAGE-Global Nutrient Model (GNM) is a global distributed spatially explicit model using hydrology as the basis for describing nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) delivery to surface water and transport and in-stream retention in rivers, lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. IMAGE-GNM is coupled to the PCR-GLOBWB global hydrological model ([[Van Beek et al. 2011]]). In the IMAGE-GNM model, grid cells receive water with dissolved and suspended N and P from upstream grid cells; inside grid cells, N and P are delivered to water bodies via diffuse sources (surface runoff, shallow and deep groundwater, riparian zones; litterfall in floodplains; atmospheric deposition) and point sources (wastewater); N and P retention in a water body is calculated on the basis of the residence time of the water and nutrient uptake velocity; subsequently, water and nutrients are transported to downstream grid cells. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wastewater===&lt;br /&gt;
Urban wastewater contains N and P emitted by households and industries that are connected to a sewerage system, and households with sanitation but without a sewerage connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N discharges to surface water (&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;sw&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; in kg per person per year) are calculated as follows ([[Van Drecht et al., 2009]]; [[Morée et al., 2013]]):{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula1 Nutrients}}where:  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hum&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is human N emissions (kg per person per year), &lt;br /&gt;
* D is the proportion of the total population connected to public sewerage systems (no dimension), &lt;br /&gt;
*R N is the overall removal of N through wastewater treatment (no dimension). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total P emissions to surface water are calculated in a similar way, but also include estimates of P emissions to surface water resulting from the use of P-based dishwasher and laundry detergents. Nutrient removal by wastewater treatment R is based on the relative contribution of four classes of treatment (none, primary, secondary and tertiary treatment). D is calculated from the proportion of households with improved sanitation. D and R by treatment class are scenario variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil nutrient budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The soil budget approach ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]) considers all N and P inputs and outputs for IMAGE grid cells. N input terms in the budgets include application of synthetic N fertiliser (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fert&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and animal manure (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;man&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), biological N fixation (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fix&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), and atmospheric N deposition (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dep&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Output terms include N withdrawal from the field through crop harvesting, hay and grass cutting, and grass consumed by grazing animals (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;withdr&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soil N budget (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;budget&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is calculated as follows:{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula2 Nutrients}}  &lt;br /&gt;
The same approach is used for P, with input terms being animal manure and fertiliser. The soil nutrient budget does not include nutrient accumulation in soil organic matter for a positive budget (surplus), or nutrient depletion due to soil organic matter decomposition and mineralisation. With no accumulation, a surplus represents a potential loss to the environment. For N this includes NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation (see Component [[Emissions]]), denitrification, surface runoff and leaching. For P, this is surface runoff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For spatial allocation of the nutrient input to IMAGE grid cells, grass and the crop groups in IMAGE (temperate cereals, rice, maize, tropical cereals, pulses, roots and tubers, oil crops, other crops, energy crops) and grass are aggregated to five broad groups. These groups are grass, wetland rice, leguminous crops, other upland crops and energy crops for both mixed and pastoral production systems (see [[Livestock systems]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertiliser====&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser use is based on nutrient use efficiency, representing crop production in kilograms of dry matter per kilogram of fertiliser N (NUE) and P (PUE). NUE and PUE vary between countries because of differences in crop mix, attainable yield potential, soil quality, amount and form of N and P application and management. In constructing scenarios on fertiliser use, data on the 1970–2005 period serve as a guide to distinguish countries with an input exceeding crop uptake (positive budget or surplus) from countries with a deficit. Generally, farmers in countries with a surplus are assumed to be increasingly efficient in fertiliser use (increasing NUE and PUE). In countries with nutrient deficits, an increase in crop yields is only possible with an increase in the nutrient input. Initially, this will lead to decreasing NUE and PUE, showing a decrease in soil nutrient depletion due to increased fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Manure====&lt;br /&gt;
Total manure production is computed from animal stocks and N and P excretion rates (Figure Flowchart, middle). IMAGE uses constant N and P excretion rates per head for dairy and non-dairy cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats, pigs, poultry, horses, asses, mules and camels. Constant excretion rates imply that the N and P excretion per unit of product decreases with increased milk and meat production per animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N and P in the manure for each animal category are spatially allocated to mixed and pastoral systems. In each country and system, the manure is distributed over three management systems: grazing; storage in animal housing and storage systems; and manure used outside the agricultural system for fuel or other purposes. The quantity of manure assigned to grazing is based on the proportion of grass in feed rations (Figure Flowchart, middle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stored animal manure available for cropland and grassland application includes all stored and collected manure, excluding ammonia volatilisation from animal houses and storage systems. In general, IMAGE assumes that 50% of available animal manure from storage systems is applied to arable land and the rest to grassland in industrialised countries. In most developing countries, 95% of the available manure is spread on croplands and 5% on grassland, thus accounting for the lower economic importance of grass compared to crops in these countries. In the European Union, maximum manure application rates are 170 to 250 kg N per ha , reflecting current regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation====&lt;br /&gt;
Data on biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) are obtained from the N in the harvested product (see nutrient withdrawal) following the approach of ([[Salvagiotti et al., 2008]]). Thus any change in the rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by legumes is the result of yield changes for pulses and soybeans. In addition to leguminous crops, IMAGE uses an annual rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation of 5 kg N per ha for non-leguminous crops and grass, and 25 kg N per ha for wetland rice. N fixation rates in natural ecosystems were based on the low estimates for areal coverage by legumes ([[Cleveland et al., 1999]]) as described by Bouwman et al. ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Atmospheric deposition==== &lt;br /&gt;
Deposition rates for historical and future years are calculated by scaling N deposition field for 2000 (obtained from atmospheric chemistry transport models), using emission inventories for the historical period and N gas emissions in the scenario considered. IMAGE does not include atmospheric P deposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrient withdrawal==== &lt;br /&gt;
Withdrawal of N and P in harvested products is calculated from regional crop production in IMAGE and the N and P content for each crop, which is aggregated to the broad crop categories (wetland rice, leguminous crops, upland crops and energy crops). IMAGE also accounts for uptake by fodder crops. N withdrawal through grass consumption and harvest is assumed to amount to 60% of all N input (manure, fertiliser, deposition, N fixation), excluding NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation. P withdrawal through grazing or grass cutting is calculated as a proportion of 87.5% of fertiliser and manure P input. The rest is assumed to be lost through surface runoff. In calculating spatially nutrient withdrawal, a procedure is used to downscale regional crop production data from IMAGE to country estimates for nutrient withdrawal based on distributions in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nutrient environmental fate===&lt;br /&gt;
Nutrient losses from the plant-soil system to the soil-hydrology system are calculated from the soil nutrient budgets ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]). For N, the budget is corrected for ammonia volatilisation from grazing animals and from fertiliser and manure spreading (see Component [[Emissions]]). P not taken up by plants is generally bound to soil particles, with the only loss pathway being surface runoff. N is more mobile and is transported via surface runoff and through soil, groundwater and riparian zones to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil denitrification and leaching====&lt;br /&gt;
Denitrification is calculated as a proportion of the soil N budget surplus based on the effect of temperature and residence time of water and nitrate in the root zone, and the effects of soil texture, soil drainage and soil organic carbon content. In a soil budget deficit, IMAGE assumes that denitrification does not occur. Leaching is the complement of the soil N budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Groundwater transport, surface runoff and denitrification====&lt;br /&gt;
Two groundwater subsystems are distinguished. One is the shallow groundwater system representing interflow and surface runoff for the upper 5 m of the saturated zone, with short travel times for the water to enter local surface water at short distances or to infiltrate the deep groundwater system. The other is the deep system with a thickness of 50 m with generally long travel times draining to larger streams and rivers. Deep groundwater is assumed to be absent in areas of non-permeable, consolidated rocks or in the presence of surface water. Denitrification during groundwater transport is based on the travel time and the half-life of nitrate. The half-life depends on the lithological class (1 year for schists and shales containing pyrite, 2 years for alluvial material, and 5 years for all other lithological classes). Flows of water and nitrate from shallow groundwater to riparian zones are assumed to be absent in areas with surface water bodies, where the flow is assumed to bypass riparian zones flowing directly to streams or rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denitrification in riparian areas====&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation of denitrification in riparian areas is similar to that in soils, but with two differences: &lt;br /&gt;
# a biologically active layer of 0.3 m thickness is assumed instead of 1 m for other soils; &lt;br /&gt;
# the approach includes the effect of pH on denitrification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrients from vegetation in floodplains====&lt;br /&gt;
NPP from the LPJ model [[Carbon cycle and natural vegetation]] for wetlands and floodplains are used. Part of annual NPP is assumed to be deposited in the water during flooding, and where flooding is temporary, the litter from preceeding periods is assumed to be available for transport in the flood water.  50% of total NPP is assumed to end in the surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Other direct sources of nutrients====&lt;br /&gt;
Other sources include aquaculture, weathering and atmospheric deposition. Deposition is from the same data as used for the land nutriënt budgets. Aquaculture is taken from data from two recent studies ([[Bouwman et al., 2011]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]), and weathering. The calculation of P release from weathering is based on a recent study ([[Hartmann et al., 2014]]) which uses the lithological classes distinguished by ([[Dürr et al., 2005]]). The lithological classes are available on a 5 by 5 minute resolution, hence the weighted average P concentration within each 0.5 by 0.5 degree grid cell is calculated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In-stream nutrient retention====&lt;br /&gt;
The water that enters streams and rivers through surface runoff and discharges from groundwater and riparian zones is routed through stream and river channels, and passes through lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. The nutrient retention in each of these systems is calculated on the basis of the nutrient spiralling ecological concept, which is based on residence time and temperature as described in ([[Beusen et al., 2014]]; [[Beusen et al., 2015]]).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27582</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Description</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27582"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T13:19:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Van Drecht et al., 2009; Cleveland et al., 1999; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description====General===&lt;br /&gt;
The IMAGE-Global Nutrient Model (GNM) is a global distributed spatially explicit model using hydrology as the basis for describing nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) delivery to surface water and transport and in-stream retention in rivers, lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. IMAGE-GNM is coupled to the PCR-GLOBWB global hydrological model ([[Van Beek et al. 2011]]). In the IMAGE-GNM model, grid cells receive water with dissolved and suspended N and P from upstream grid cells; inside grid cells, N and P are delivered to water bodies via diffuse sources (surface runoff, shallow and deep groundwater, riparian zones; litterfall in floodplains; atmospheric deposition) and point sources (wastewater); N and P retention in a water body is calculated on the basis of the residence time of the water and nutrient uptake velocity; subsequently, water and nutrients are transported to downstream grid cells. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wastewater===&lt;br /&gt;
Urban wastewater contains N and P emitted by households and industries that are connected to a sewerage system, and households with sanitation but without a sewerage connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N discharges to surface water (&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;sw&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; in kg per person per year) are calculated as follows ([[Van Drecht et al., 2009]]; [[Morée et al., 2013]]):{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula1 Nutrients}}where:  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hum&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is human N emissions (kg per person per year), &lt;br /&gt;
* D is the proportion of the total population connected to public sewerage systems (no dimension), &lt;br /&gt;
*R N is the overall removal of N through wastewater treatment (no dimension). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total P emissions to surface water are calculated in a similar way, but also include estimates of P emissions to surface water resulting from the use of P-based dishwasher and laundry detergents. Nutrient removal by wastewater treatment R is based on the relative contribution of four classes of treatment (none, primary, secondary and tertiary treatment). D is calculated from the proportion of households with improved sanitation. D and R by treatment class are scenario variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil nutrient budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The soil budget approach ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]) considers all N and P inputs and outputs for IMAGE grid cells. N input terms in the budgets include application of synthetic N fertiliser (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fert&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and animal manure (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;man&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), biological N fixation (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fix&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), and atmospheric N deposition (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dep&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Output terms include N withdrawal from the field through crop harvesting, hay and grass cutting, and grass consumed by grazing animals (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;withdr&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soil N budget (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;budget&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is calculated as follows:{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula2 Nutrients}}  &lt;br /&gt;
The same approach is used for P, with input terms being animal manure and fertiliser. The soil nutrient budget does not include nutrient accumulation in soil organic matter for a positive budget (surplus), or nutrient depletion due to soil organic matter decomposition and mineralisation. With no accumulation, a surplus represents a potential loss to the environment. For N this includes NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation (see Component [[Emissions]]), denitrification, surface runoff and leaching. For P, this is surface runoff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For spatial allocation of the nutrient input to IMAGE grid cells, grass and the crop groups in IMAGE (temperate cereals, rice, maize, tropical cereals, pulses, roots and tubers, oil crops, other crops, energy crops) and grass are aggregated to five broad groups. These groups are grass, wetland rice, leguminous crops, other upland crops and energy crops for both mixed and pastoral production systems (see [[Livestock systems]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertiliser====&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser use is based on nutrient use efficiency, representing crop production in kilograms of dry matter per kilogram of fertiliser N (NUE) and P (PUE). NUE and PUE vary between countries because of differences in crop mix, attainable yield potential, soil quality, amount and form of N and P application and management. In constructing scenarios on fertiliser use, data on the 1970–2005 period serve as a guide to distinguish countries with an input exceeding crop uptake (positive budget or surplus) from countries with a deficit. Generally, farmers in countries with a surplus are assumed to be increasingly efficient in fertiliser use (increasing NUE and PUE). In countries with nutrient deficits, an increase in crop yields is only possible with an increase in the nutrient input. Initially, this will lead to decreasing NUE and PUE, showing a decrease in soil nutrient depletion due to increased fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Manure====&lt;br /&gt;
Total manure production is computed from animal stocks and N and P excretion rates (Figure Flowchart, middle). IMAGE uses constant N and P excretion rates per head for dairy and non-dairy cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats, pigs, poultry, horses, asses, mules and camels. Constant excretion rates imply that the N and P excretion per unit of product decreases with increased milk and meat production per animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N and P in the manure for each animal category are spatially allocated to mixed and pastoral systems. In each country and system, the manure is distributed over three management systems: grazing; storage in animal housing and storage systems; and manure used outside the agricultural system for fuel or other purposes. The quantity of manure assigned to grazing is based on the proportion of grass in feed rations (Figure Flowchart, middle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stored animal manure available for cropland and grassland application includes all stored and collected manure, excluding ammonia volatilisation from animal houses and storage systems. In general, IMAGE assumes that 50% of available animal manure from storage systems is applied to arable land and the rest to grassland in industrialised countries. In most developing countries, 95% of the available manure is spread on croplands and 5% on grassland, thus accounting for the lower economic importance of grass compared to crops in these countries. In the European Union, maximum manure application rates are 170 to 250 kg N per ha , reflecting current regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation====&lt;br /&gt;
Data on biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) are obtained from the N in the harvested product (see nutrient withdrawal) following the approach of ([[Salvagiotti et al., 2008]]). Thus any change in the rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by legumes is the result of yield changes for pulses and soybeans. In addition to leguminous crops, IMAGE uses an annual rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation of 5 kg N per ha for non-leguminous crops and grass, and 25 kg N per ha for wetland rice. N fixation rates in natural ecosystems were based on the low estimates for areal coverage by legumes ([[Cleveland et al., 1999]]) as described by Bouwman et al. ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Atmospheric deposition==== &lt;br /&gt;
Deposition rates for historical and future years are calculated by scaling N deposition field for 2000 (obtained from atmospheric chemistry transport models), using emission inventories for the historical period and N gas emissions in the scenario considered. IMAGE does not include atmospheric P deposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrient withdrawal==== &lt;br /&gt;
Withdrawal of N and P in harvested products is calculated from regional crop production in IMAGE and the N and P content for each crop, which is aggregated to the broad crop categories (wetland rice, leguminous crops, upland crops and energy crops). IMAGE also accounts for uptake by fodder crops. N withdrawal through grass consumption and harvest is assumed to amount to 60% of all N input (manure, fertiliser, deposition, N fixation), excluding NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation. P withdrawal through grazing or grass cutting is calculated as a proportion of 87.5% of fertiliser and manure P input. The rest is assumed to be lost through surface runoff. In calculating spatially nutrient withdrawal, a procedure is used to downscale regional crop production data from IMAGE to country estimates for nutrient withdrawal based on distributions in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nutrient environmental fate===&lt;br /&gt;
Nutrient losses from the plant-soil system to the soil-hydrology system are calculated from the soil nutrient budgets ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]). For N, the budget is corrected for ammonia volatilisation from grazing animals and from fertiliser and manure spreading (see Component [[Emissions]]). P not taken up by plants is generally bound to soil particles, with the only loss pathway being surface runoff. N is more mobile and is transported via surface runoff and through soil, groundwater and riparian zones to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil denitrification and leaching====&lt;br /&gt;
Denitrification is calculated as a proportion of the soil N budget surplus based on the effect of temperature and residence time of water and nitrate in the root zone, and the effects of soil texture, soil drainage and soil organic carbon content. In a soil budget deficit, IMAGE assumes that denitrification does not occur. Leaching is the complement of the soil N budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Groundwater transport, surface runoff and denitrification====&lt;br /&gt;
Two groundwater subsystems are distinguished. One is the shallow groundwater system representing interflow and surface runoff for the upper 5 m of the saturated zone, with short travel times for the water to enter local surface water at short distances or to infiltrate the deep groundwater system. The other is the deep system with a thickness of 50 m with generally long travel times draining to larger streams and rivers. Deep groundwater is assumed to be absent in areas of non-permeable, consolidated rocks or in the presence of surface water. Denitrification during groundwater transport is based on the travel time and the half-life of nitrate. The half-life depends on the lithological class (1 year for schists and shales containing pyrite, 2 years for alluvial material, and 5 years for all other lithological classes). Flows of water and nitrate from shallow groundwater to riparian zones are assumed to be absent in areas with surface water bodies, where the flow is assumed to bypass riparian zones flowing directly to streams or rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denitrification in riparian areas====&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation of denitrification in riparian areas is similar to that in soils, but with two differences: &lt;br /&gt;
# a biologically active layer of 0.3 m thickness is assumed instead of 1 m for other soils; &lt;br /&gt;
# the approach includes the effect of pH on denitrification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Vegetation in floodplains====&lt;br /&gt;
NPP from the LPJ model [[Carbon cycle and natural vegetation]] for wetlands and floodplains are used. Part of annual NPP is assumed to be deposited in the water during flooding, and where flooding is temporary, the litter from preceeding periods is assumed to be available for transport in the flood water.  50% of total NPP is assumed to end in the surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Other sources====&lt;br /&gt;
Other sources include aquaculture, weathering and atmospheric deposition. Deposition is from the same data as used for the land nutriënt budgets. Aquaculture is taken from data from two recent studies ([[Bouwman et al., 2011]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]), and weathering. The calculation of P release from weathering is based on a recent study ([[Hartmann et al., 2014]]) which uses the lithological classes distinguished by ([[Dürr et al., 2005]]). The lithological classes are available on a 5 by 5 minute resolution, hence the weighted average P concentration within each 0.5 by 0.5 degree grid cell is calculated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In-stream nutrient retention====&lt;br /&gt;
The water that enters streams and rivers through surface runoff and discharges from groundwater and riparian zones is routed through stream and river channels, and passes through lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. The nutrient retention in each of these systems is calculated on the basis of the nutrient spiralling ecological concept, which is based on residence time and temperature as described in ([[Beusen et al., 2014]]; [[Beusen et al., 2015]]).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27580</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Description</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27580"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T13:12:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Van Drecht et al., 2009; Cleveland et al., 1999; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description====Wastewater===&lt;br /&gt;
Urban wastewater contains N and P emitted by households and industries that are connected to a sewerage system, and households with sanitation but without a sewerage connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N discharges to surface water (&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;sw&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; in kg per person per year) are calculated as follows ([[Van Drecht et al., 2009]]; [[Morée et al., 2013]]):{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula1 Nutrients}}where:  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hum&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is human N emissions (kg per person per year), &lt;br /&gt;
* D is the proportion of the total population connected to public sewerage systems (no dimension), &lt;br /&gt;
*R N is the overall removal of N through wastewater treatment (no dimension). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total P emissions to surface water are calculated in a similar way, but also include estimates of P emissions to surface water resulting from the use of P-based dishwasher and laundry detergents. Nutrient removal by wastewater treatment R is based on the relative contribution of four classes of treatment (none, primary, secondary and tertiary treatment). D is calculated from the proportion of households with improved sanitation. D and R by treatment class are scenario variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil nutrient budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The soil budget approach ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]) considers all N and P inputs and outputs for IMAGE grid cells. N input terms in the budgets include application of synthetic N fertiliser (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fert&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and animal manure (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;man&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), biological N fixation (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fix&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), and atmospheric N deposition (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dep&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Output terms include N withdrawal from the field through crop harvesting, hay and grass cutting, and grass consumed by grazing animals (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;withdr&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soil N budget (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;budget&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is calculated as follows:{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula2 Nutrients}}  &lt;br /&gt;
The same approach is used for P, with input terms being animal manure and fertiliser. The soil nutrient budget does not include nutrient accumulation in soil organic matter for a positive budget (surplus), or nutrient depletion due to soil organic matter decomposition and mineralisation. With no accumulation, a surplus represents a potential loss to the environment. For N this includes NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation (see Component [[Emissions]]), denitrification, surface runoff and leaching. For P, this is surface runoff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For spatial allocation of the nutrient input to IMAGE grid cells, grass and the crop groups in IMAGE (temperate cereals, rice, maize, tropical cereals, pulses, roots and tubers, oil crops, other crops, energy crops) and grass are aggregated to five broad groups. These groups are grass, wetland rice, leguminous crops, other upland crops and energy crops for both mixed and pastoral production systems (see [[Livestock systems]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertiliser====&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser use is based on nutrient use efficiency, representing crop production in kilograms of dry matter per kilogram of fertiliser N (NUE) and P (PUE). NUE and PUE vary between countries because of differences in crop mix, attainable yield potential, soil quality, amount and form of N and P application and management. In constructing scenarios on fertiliser use, data on the 1970–2005 period serve as a guide to distinguish countries with an input exceeding crop uptake (positive budget or surplus) from countries with a deficit. Generally, farmers in countries with a surplus are assumed to be increasingly efficient in fertiliser use (increasing NUE and PUE). In countries with nutrient deficits, an increase in crop yields is only possible with an increase in the nutrient input. Initially, this will lead to decreasing NUE and PUE, showing a decrease in soil nutrient depletion due to increased fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Manure====&lt;br /&gt;
Total manure production is computed from animal stocks and N and P excretion rates (Figure Flowchart, middle). IMAGE uses constant N and P excretion rates per head for dairy and non-dairy cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats, pigs, poultry, horses, asses, mules and camels. Constant excretion rates imply that the N and P excretion per unit of product decreases with increased milk and meat production per animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N and P in the manure for each animal category are spatially allocated to mixed and pastoral systems. In each country and system, the manure is distributed over three management systems: grazing; storage in animal housing and storage systems; and manure used outside the agricultural system for fuel or other purposes. The quantity of manure assigned to grazing is based on the proportion of grass in feed rations (Figure Flowchart, middle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stored animal manure available for cropland and grassland application includes all stored and collected manure, excluding ammonia volatilisation from animal houses and storage systems. In general, IMAGE assumes that 50% of available animal manure from storage systems is applied to arable land and the rest to grassland in industrialised countries. In most developing countries, 95% of the available manure is spread on croplands and 5% on grassland, thus accounting for the lower economic importance of grass compared to crops in these countries. In the European Union, maximum manure application rates are 170 to 250 kg N per ha , reflecting current regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation====&lt;br /&gt;
Data on biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) are obtained from the N in the harvested product (see nutrient withdrawal) following the approach of ([[Salvagiotti et al., 2008]]). Thus any change in the rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by legumes is the result of yield changes for pulses and soybeans. In addition to leguminous crops, IMAGE uses an annual rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation of 5 kg N per ha for non-leguminous crops and grass, and 25 kg N per ha for wetland rice. N fixation rates in natural ecosystems were based on the low estimates for areal coverage by legumes ([[Cleveland et al., 1999]]) as described by Bouwman et al. ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Atmospheric deposition==== &lt;br /&gt;
Deposition rates for historical and future years are calculated by scaling N deposition field for 2000 (obtained from atmospheric chemistry transport models), using emission inventories for the historical period and N gas emissions in the scenario considered. IMAGE does not include atmospheric P deposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrient withdrawal==== &lt;br /&gt;
Withdrawal of N and P in harvested products is calculated from regional crop production in IMAGE and the N and P content for each crop, which is aggregated to the broad crop categories (wetland rice, leguminous crops, upland crops and energy crops). IMAGE also accounts for uptake by fodder crops. N withdrawal through grass consumption and harvest is assumed to amount to 60% of all N input (manure, fertiliser, deposition, N fixation), excluding NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation. P withdrawal through grazing or grass cutting is calculated as a proportion of 87.5% of fertiliser and manure P input. The rest is assumed to be lost through surface runoff. In calculating spatially nutrient withdrawal, a procedure is used to downscale regional crop production data from IMAGE to country estimates for nutrient withdrawal based on distributions in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nutrient environmental fate===&lt;br /&gt;
Nutrient losses from the plant-soil system to the soil-hydrology system are calculated from the soil nutrient budgets ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]). For N, the budget is corrected for ammonia volatilisation from grazing animals and from fertiliser and manure spreading (see Component [[Emissions]]). P not taken up by plants is generally bound to soil particles, with the only loss pathway being surface runoff. N is more mobile and is transported via surface runoff and through soil, groundwater and riparian zones to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil denitrification and leaching====&lt;br /&gt;
Denitrification is calculated as a proportion of the soil N budget surplus based on the effect of temperature and residence time of water and nitrate in the root zone, and the effects of soil texture, soil drainage and soil organic carbon content. In a soil budget deficit, IMAGE assumes that denitrification does not occur. Leaching is the complement of the soil N budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Groundwater transport, surface runoff and denitrification====&lt;br /&gt;
Two groundwater subsystems are distinguished. One is the shallow groundwater system representing interflow and surface runoff for the upper 5 m of the saturated zone, with short travel times for the water to enter local surface water at short distances or to infiltrate the deep groundwater system. The other is the deep system with a thickness of 50 m with generally long travel times draining to larger streams and rivers. Deep groundwater is assumed to be absent in areas of non-permeable, consolidated rocks or in the presence of surface water. Denitrification during groundwater transport is based on the travel time and the half-life of nitrate. The half-life depends on the lithological class (1 year for schists and shales containing pyrite, 2 years for alluvial material, and 5 years for all other lithological classes). Flows of water and nitrate from shallow groundwater to riparian zones are assumed to be absent in areas with surface water bodies, where the flow is assumed to bypass riparian zones flowing directly to streams or rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denitrification in riparian areas====&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation of denitrification in riparian areas is similar to that in soils, but with two differences: &lt;br /&gt;
# a biologically active layer of 0.3 m thickness is assumed instead of 1 m for other soils; &lt;br /&gt;
# the approach includes the effect of pH on denitrification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Vegetation in floodplains====&lt;br /&gt;
NPP from the LPJ model [[Carbon cycle and natural vegetation]] for wetlands and floodplains are used. Part of annual NPP is assumed to be deposited in the water during flooding, and where flooding is temporary, the litter from preceeding periods is assumed to be available for transport in the flood water.  50% of total NPP is assumed to end in the surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Other sources====&lt;br /&gt;
Other sources include aquaculture, weathering and atmospheric deposition. Deposition is from the same data as used for the land nutriënt budgets. Aquaculture is taken from data from two recent studies ([[Bouwman et al., 2011]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]), and weathering. The calculation of P release from weathering is based on a recent study ([[Hartmann et al., 2014]]) which uses the lithological classes distinguished by ([[Dürr et al., 2005]]). The lithological classes are available on a 5 by 5 minute resolution, hence the weighted average P concentration within each 0.5 by 0.5 degree grid cell is calculated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In-stream nutrient retention====&lt;br /&gt;
The water that enters streams and rivers through surface runoff and discharges from groundwater and riparian zones is routed through stream and river channels, and passes through lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. The nutrient retention in each of these systems is calculated on the basis of the nutrient spiralling ecological concept, which is based on residence time and temperature as described in ([[Beusen et al., 2014]]; [[Beusen et al., 2015]]).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=D%C3%BCrr_et_al.,_2005&amp;diff=27579</id>
		<title>Dürr et al., 2005</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=D%C3%BCrr_et_al.,_2005&amp;diff=27579"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T13:11:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: Created page with &amp;quot;{{ReferenceTemplate |Author=Dürr, H. H., Meybeck, M., and Dürr, S. |Year=2005 |Title=Lithologic composition of the earth&amp;#039;s continental surfaces derived from a new digital ma...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ReferenceTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Author=Dürr, H. H., Meybeck, M., and Dürr, S.&lt;br /&gt;
|Year=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|Title=Lithologic composition of the earth&#039;s continental surfaces derived from a new digital map emphasizing riverine material transfer&lt;br /&gt;
|DOI=10.1029/2005GB002515&lt;br /&gt;
|PublicationType=Journal article&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume5=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher=&lt;br /&gt;
|City=&lt;br /&gt;
|ISBN=&lt;br /&gt;
|BookTitle=&lt;br /&gt;
|Editor=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher2=&lt;br /&gt;
|City2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume=&lt;br /&gt;
|Pages=&lt;br /&gt;
|ISBN2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Editor2=&lt;br /&gt;
|SeriesTitle=&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume4=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher3=&lt;br /&gt;
|City3=&lt;br /&gt;
|ISBN3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Editor3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Institution=&lt;br /&gt;
|ReportNumber=&lt;br /&gt;
|SeriesTitle2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher5=&lt;br /&gt;
|City5=&lt;br /&gt;
|Journal=Global  Biogeochemical Cycles&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume2=19, GB4S10&lt;br /&gt;
|SecondaryTitle=&lt;br /&gt;
|SecondaryAuthor=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher4=&lt;br /&gt;
|City4=&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Pages3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Date=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Hartmann_et_al.,_2014&amp;diff=27578</id>
		<title>Hartmann et al., 2014</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Hartmann_et_al.,_2014&amp;diff=27578"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T13:08:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: Created page with &amp;quot;{{ReferenceTemplate |Author=Hartmann, J., Moosdorf, N., Lauerwald, R., Hinderer, M., and West, A.J. |Year=2014 |Title=Global chemical weathering and associated p-release — t...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ReferenceTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Author=Hartmann, J., Moosdorf, N., Lauerwald, R., Hinderer, M., and West, A.J.&lt;br /&gt;
|Year=2014&lt;br /&gt;
|Title=Global chemical weathering and associated p-release — the role of lithology, temperature and soil properties&lt;br /&gt;
|DOI=10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.10.025&lt;br /&gt;
|PublicationType=Journal article&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume5=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher=&lt;br /&gt;
|City=&lt;br /&gt;
|ISBN=&lt;br /&gt;
|BookTitle=&lt;br /&gt;
|Editor=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher2=&lt;br /&gt;
|City2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume=&lt;br /&gt;
|Pages=&lt;br /&gt;
|ISBN2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Editor2=&lt;br /&gt;
|SeriesTitle=&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume4=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher3=&lt;br /&gt;
|City3=&lt;br /&gt;
|ISBN3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Editor3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Institution=&lt;br /&gt;
|ReportNumber=&lt;br /&gt;
|SeriesTitle2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher5=&lt;br /&gt;
|City5=&lt;br /&gt;
|Journal=Chemical Geology&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume2=363&lt;br /&gt;
|Pages2=145-163&lt;br /&gt;
|SecondaryTitle=&lt;br /&gt;
|SecondaryAuthor=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher4=&lt;br /&gt;
|City4=&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Pages3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Date=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.10.025&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27577</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Description</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27577"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T13:05:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Van Drecht et al., 2009; Cleveland et al., 1999; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description====Wastewater===&lt;br /&gt;
Urban wastewater contains N and P emitted by households and industries that are connected to a sewerage system, and households with sanitation but without a sewerage connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N discharges to surface water (&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;sw&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; in kg per person per year) are calculated as follows ([[Van Drecht et al., 2009]]; [[Morée et al., 2013]]):{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula1 Nutrients}}where:  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hum&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is human N emissions (kg per person per year), &lt;br /&gt;
* D is the proportion of the total population connected to public sewerage systems (no dimension), &lt;br /&gt;
*R N is the overall removal of N through wastewater treatment (no dimension). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total P emissions to surface water are calculated in a similar way, but also include estimates of P emissions to surface water resulting from the use of P-based dishwasher and laundry detergents. Nutrient removal by wastewater treatment R is based on the relative contribution of four classes of treatment (none, primary, secondary and tertiary treatment). D is calculated from the proportion of households with improved sanitation. D and R by treatment class are scenario variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil nutrient budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The soil budget approach ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]) considers all N and P inputs and outputs for IMAGE grid cells. N input terms in the budgets include application of synthetic N fertiliser (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fert&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and animal manure (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;man&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), biological N fixation (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fix&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), and atmospheric N deposition (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dep&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Output terms include N withdrawal from the field through crop harvesting, hay and grass cutting, and grass consumed by grazing animals (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;withdr&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soil N budget (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;budget&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is calculated as follows:{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula2 Nutrients}}  &lt;br /&gt;
The same approach is used for P, with input terms being animal manure and fertiliser. The soil nutrient budget does not include nutrient accumulation in soil organic matter for a positive budget (surplus), or nutrient depletion due to soil organic matter decomposition and mineralisation. With no accumulation, a surplus represents a potential loss to the environment. For N this includes NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation (see Component [[Emissions]]), denitrification, surface runoff and leaching. For P, this is surface runoff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For spatial allocation of the nutrient input to IMAGE grid cells, grass and the crop groups in IMAGE (temperate cereals, rice, maize, tropical cereals, pulses, roots and tubers, oil crops, other crops, energy crops) and grass are aggregated to five broad groups. These groups are grass, wetland rice, leguminous crops, other upland crops and energy crops for both mixed and pastoral production systems (see [[Livestock systems]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertiliser====&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser use is based on nutrient use efficiency, representing crop production in kilograms of dry matter per kilogram of fertiliser N (NUE) and P (PUE). NUE and PUE vary between countries because of differences in crop mix, attainable yield potential, soil quality, amount and form of N and P application and management. In constructing scenarios on fertiliser use, data on the 1970–2005 period serve as a guide to distinguish countries with an input exceeding crop uptake (positive budget or surplus) from countries with a deficit. Generally, farmers in countries with a surplus are assumed to be increasingly efficient in fertiliser use (increasing NUE and PUE). In countries with nutrient deficits, an increase in crop yields is only possible with an increase in the nutrient input. Initially, this will lead to decreasing NUE and PUE, showing a decrease in soil nutrient depletion due to increased fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Manure====&lt;br /&gt;
Total manure production is computed from animal stocks and N and P excretion rates (Figure Flowchart, middle). IMAGE uses constant N and P excretion rates per head for dairy and non-dairy cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats, pigs, poultry, horses, asses, mules and camels. Constant excretion rates imply that the N and P excretion per unit of product decreases with increased milk and meat production per animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N and P in the manure for each animal category are spatially allocated to mixed and pastoral systems. In each country and system, the manure is distributed over three management systems: grazing; storage in animal housing and storage systems; and manure used outside the agricultural system for fuel or other purposes. The quantity of manure assigned to grazing is based on the proportion of grass in feed rations (Figure Flowchart, middle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stored animal manure available for cropland and grassland application includes all stored and collected manure, excluding ammonia volatilisation from animal houses and storage systems. In general, IMAGE assumes that 50% of available animal manure from storage systems is applied to arable land and the rest to grassland in industrialised countries. In most developing countries, 95% of the available manure is spread on croplands and 5% on grassland, thus accounting for the lower economic importance of grass compared to crops in these countries. In the European Union, maximum manure application rates are 170 to 250 kg N per ha , reflecting current regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation====&lt;br /&gt;
Data on biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) are obtained from the N in the harvested product (see nutrient withdrawal) following the approach of ([[Salvagiotti et al., 2008]]). Thus any change in the rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by legumes is the result of yield changes for pulses and soybeans. In addition to leguminous crops, IMAGE uses an annual rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation of 5 kg N per ha for non-leguminous crops and grass, and 25 kg N per ha for wetland rice. N fixation rates in natural ecosystems were based on the low estimates for areal coverage by legumes ([[Cleveland et al., 1999]]) as described by Bouwman et al. ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Atmospheric deposition==== &lt;br /&gt;
Deposition rates for historical and future years are calculated by scaling N deposition field for 2000 (obtained from atmospheric chemistry transport models), using emission inventories for the historical period and N gas emissions in the scenario considered. IMAGE does not include atmospheric P deposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrient withdrawal==== &lt;br /&gt;
Withdrawal of N and P in harvested products is calculated from regional crop production in IMAGE and the N and P content for each crop, which is aggregated to the broad crop categories (wetland rice, leguminous crops, upland crops and energy crops). IMAGE also accounts for uptake by fodder crops. N withdrawal through grass consumption and harvest is assumed to amount to 60% of all N input (manure, fertiliser, deposition, N fixation), excluding NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation. P withdrawal through grazing or grass cutting is calculated as a proportion of 87.5% of fertiliser and manure P input. The rest is assumed to be lost through surface runoff. In calculating spatially nutrient withdrawal, a procedure is used to downscale regional crop production data from IMAGE to country estimates for nutrient withdrawal based on distributions in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nutrient environmental fate===&lt;br /&gt;
Nutrient losses from the plant-soil system to the soil-hydrology system are calculated from the soil nutrient budgets ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]). For N, the budget is corrected for ammonia volatilisation from grazing animals and from fertiliser and manure spreading (see Component [[Emissions]]). P not taken up by plants is generally bound to soil particles, with the only loss pathway being surface runoff. N is more mobile and is transported via surface runoff and through soil, groundwater and riparian zones to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil denitrification and leaching====&lt;br /&gt;
Denitrification is calculated as a proportion of the soil N budget surplus based on the effect of temperature and residence time of water and nitrate in the root zone, and the effects of soil texture, soil drainage and soil organic carbon content. In a soil budget deficit, IMAGE assumes that denitrification does not occur. Leaching is the complement of the soil N budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Groundwater transport, surface runoff and denitrification====&lt;br /&gt;
Two groundwater subsystems are distinguished. One is the shallow groundwater system representing interflow and surface runoff for the upper 5 m of the saturated zone, with short travel times for the water to enter local surface water at short distances or to infiltrate the deep groundwater system. The other is the deep system with a thickness of 50 m with generally long travel times draining to larger streams and rivers. Deep groundwater is assumed to be absent in areas of non-permeable, consolidated rocks or in the presence of surface water. Denitrification during groundwater transport is based on the travel time and the half-life of nitrate. The half-life depends on the lithological class (1 year for schists and shales containing pyrite, 2 years for alluvial material, and 5 years for all other lithological classes). Flows of water and nitrate from shallow groundwater to riparian zones are assumed to be absent in areas with surface water bodies, where the flow is assumed to bypass riparian zones flowing directly to streams or rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denitrification in riparian areas====&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation of denitrification in riparian areas is similar to that in soils, but with two differences: &lt;br /&gt;
# a biologically active layer of 0.3 m thickness is assumed instead of 1 m for other soils; &lt;br /&gt;
# the approach includes the effect of pH on denitrification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Vegetation in floodplains====&lt;br /&gt;
NPP from the LPJ model [[Carbon cycle and natural vegetation]] for wetlands and floodplains are used. Part of annual NPP is assumed to be deposited in the water during flooding, and where flooding is temporary, the litter from preceeding periods is assumed to be available for transport in the flood water.  50% of total NPP is assumed to end in the surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Other sources====&lt;br /&gt;
Other sources include aquaculture, weathering and atmospheric deposition. Deposition is from the same data as used for the land nutriënt budgets. Aquaculture is taken from data from two recent studies, and weathering. The calculation of P release from weathering is based on a recent study ([[Hartmann et al., 2014]]) which uses the lithological classes distinguished by ([[Dürr et al., 2005]]). The lithological classes are available on a 5 by 5 minute resolution, hence the weighted average P concentration within each 0.5 by 0.5 degree grid cell is calculated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In-stream nutrient retention====&lt;br /&gt;
The water that enters streams and rivers through surface runoff and discharges from groundwater and riparian zones is routed through stream and river channels, and passes through lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. The nutrient retention in each of these systems is calculated on the basis of the nutrient spiralling ecological concept, which is based on residence time and temperature as described in ([[Beusen et al., 2014]]; [[Beusen et al., 2015]]).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27576</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Description</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27576"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:58:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Van Drecht et al., 2009; Cleveland et al., 1999; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description====Wastewater===&lt;br /&gt;
Urban wastewater contains N and P emitted by households and industries that are connected to a sewerage system, and households with sanitation but without a sewerage connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N discharges to surface water (&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;sw&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; in kg per person per year) are calculated as follows ([[Van Drecht et al., 2009]]; [[Morée et al., 2013]]):{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula1 Nutrients}}where:  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hum&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is human N emissions (kg per person per year), &lt;br /&gt;
* D is the proportion of the total population connected to public sewerage systems (no dimension), &lt;br /&gt;
*R N is the overall removal of N through wastewater treatment (no dimension). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total P emissions to surface water are calculated in a similar way, but also include estimates of P emissions to surface water resulting from the use of P-based dishwasher and laundry detergents. Nutrient removal by wastewater treatment R is based on the relative contribution of four classes of treatment (none, primary, secondary and tertiary treatment). D is calculated from the proportion of households with improved sanitation. D and R by treatment class are scenario variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil nutrient budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The soil budget approach ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]) considers all N and P inputs and outputs for IMAGE grid cells. N input terms in the budgets include application of synthetic N fertiliser (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fert&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and animal manure (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;man&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), biological N fixation (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fix&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), and atmospheric N deposition (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dep&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Output terms include N withdrawal from the field through crop harvesting, hay and grass cutting, and grass consumed by grazing animals (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;withdr&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soil N budget (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;budget&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is calculated as follows:{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula2 Nutrients}}  &lt;br /&gt;
The same approach is used for P, with input terms being animal manure and fertiliser. The soil nutrient budget does not include nutrient accumulation in soil organic matter for a positive budget (surplus), or nutrient depletion due to soil organic matter decomposition and mineralisation. With no accumulation, a surplus represents a potential loss to the environment. For N this includes NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation (see Component [[Emissions]]), denitrification, surface runoff and leaching. For P, this is surface runoff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For spatial allocation of the nutrient input to IMAGE grid cells, grass and the crop groups in IMAGE (temperate cereals, rice, maize, tropical cereals, pulses, roots and tubers, oil crops, other crops, energy crops) and grass are aggregated to five broad groups. These groups are grass, wetland rice, leguminous crops, other upland crops and energy crops for both mixed and pastoral production systems (see [[Livestock systems]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertiliser====&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser use is based on nutrient use efficiency, representing crop production in kilograms of dry matter per kilogram of fertiliser N (NUE) and P (PUE). NUE and PUE vary between countries because of differences in crop mix, attainable yield potential, soil quality, amount and form of N and P application and management. In constructing scenarios on fertiliser use, data on the 1970–2005 period serve as a guide to distinguish countries with an input exceeding crop uptake (positive budget or surplus) from countries with a deficit. Generally, farmers in countries with a surplus are assumed to be increasingly efficient in fertiliser use (increasing NUE and PUE). In countries with nutrient deficits, an increase in crop yields is only possible with an increase in the nutrient input. Initially, this will lead to decreasing NUE and PUE, showing a decrease in soil nutrient depletion due to increased fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Manure====&lt;br /&gt;
Total manure production is computed from animal stocks and N and P excretion rates (Figure Flowchart, middle). IMAGE uses constant N and P excretion rates per head for dairy and non-dairy cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats, pigs, poultry, horses, asses, mules and camels. Constant excretion rates imply that the N and P excretion per unit of product decreases with increased milk and meat production per animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N and P in the manure for each animal category are spatially allocated to mixed and pastoral systems. In each country and system, the manure is distributed over three management systems: grazing; storage in animal housing and storage systems; and manure used outside the agricultural system for fuel or other purposes. The quantity of manure assigned to grazing is based on the proportion of grass in feed rations (Figure Flowchart, middle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stored animal manure available for cropland and grassland application includes all stored and collected manure, excluding ammonia volatilisation from animal houses and storage systems. In general, IMAGE assumes that 50% of available animal manure from storage systems is applied to arable land and the rest to grassland in industrialised countries. In most developing countries, 95% of the available manure is spread on croplands and 5% on grassland, thus accounting for the lower economic importance of grass compared to crops in these countries. In the European Union, maximum manure application rates are 170 to 250 kg N per ha , reflecting current regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation====&lt;br /&gt;
Data on biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) are obtained from the N in the harvested product (see nutrient withdrawal) following the approach of ([[Salvagiotti et al., 2008]]). Thus any change in the rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by legumes is the result of yield changes for pulses and soybeans. In addition to leguminous crops, IMAGE uses an annual rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation of 5 kg N per ha for non-leguminous crops and grass, and 25 kg N per ha for wetland rice. N fixation rates in natural ecosystems were based on the low estimates for areal coverage by legumes ([[Cleveland et al., 1999]]) as described by Bouwman et al. ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Atmospheric deposition==== &lt;br /&gt;
Deposition rates for historical and future years are calculated by scaling N deposition field for 2000 (obtained from atmospheric chemistry transport models), using emission inventories for the historical period and N gas emissions in the scenario considered. IMAGE does not include atmospheric P deposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrient withdrawal==== &lt;br /&gt;
Withdrawal of N and P in harvested products is calculated from regional crop production in IMAGE and the N and P content for each crop, which is aggregated to the broad crop categories (wetland rice, leguminous crops, upland crops and energy crops). IMAGE also accounts for uptake by fodder crops. N withdrawal through grass consumption and harvest is assumed to amount to 60% of all N input (manure, fertiliser, deposition, N fixation), excluding NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation. P withdrawal through grazing or grass cutting is calculated as a proportion of 87.5% of fertiliser and manure P input. The rest is assumed to be lost through surface runoff. In calculating spatially nutrient withdrawal, a procedure is used to downscale regional crop production data from IMAGE to country estimates for nutrient withdrawal based on distributions in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nutrient environmental fate===&lt;br /&gt;
Nutrient losses from the plant-soil system to the soil-hydrology system are calculated from the soil nutrient budgets ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]). For N, the budget is corrected for ammonia volatilisation from grazing animals and from fertiliser and manure spreading (see Component [[Emissions]]). P not taken up by plants is generally bound to soil particles, with the only loss pathway being surface runoff. N is more mobile and is transported via surface runoff and through soil, groundwater and riparian zones to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil denitrification and leaching====&lt;br /&gt;
Denitrification is calculated as a proportion of the soil N budget surplus based on the effect of temperature and residence time of water and nitrate in the root zone, and the effects of soil texture, soil drainage and soil organic carbon content. In a soil budget deficit, IMAGE assumes that denitrification does not occur. Leaching is the complement of the soil N budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Groundwater transport, surface runoff and denitrification====&lt;br /&gt;
Two groundwater subsystems are distinguished. One is the shallow groundwater system representing interflow and surface runoff for the upper 5 m of the saturated zone, with short travel times for the water to enter local surface water at short distances or to infiltrate the deep groundwater system. The other is the deep system with a thickness of 50 m with generally long travel times draining to larger streams and rivers. Deep groundwater is assumed to be absent in areas of non-permeable, consolidated rocks or in the presence of surface water. Denitrification during groundwater transport is based on the travel time and the half-life of nitrate. The half-life depends on the lithological class (1 year for schists and shales containing pyrite, 2 years for alluvial material, and 5 years for all other lithological classes). Flows of water and nitrate from shallow groundwater to riparian zones are assumed to be absent in areas with surface water bodies, where the flow is assumed to bypass riparian zones flowing directly to streams or rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denitrification in riparian areas====&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation of denitrification in riparian areas is similar to that in soils, but with two differences: &lt;br /&gt;
# a biologically active layer of 0.3 m thickness is assumed instead of 1 m for other soils; &lt;br /&gt;
# the approach includes the effect of pH on denitrification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Vegetation in floodplains====&lt;br /&gt;
NPP from the LPJ model [[Carbon cycle and natural vegetation]] for wetlands and floodplains are used. Part of annual NPP is assumed to be deposited in the water during flooding, and where flooding is temporary, the litter from preceeding periods is assumed to be available for transport in the flood water.  50% of total NPP is assumed to end in the surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In-stream nutrient retention====&lt;br /&gt;
The water that enters streams and rivers through surface runoff and discharges from groundwater and riparian zones is routed through stream and river channels, and passes through lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. The nutrient retention in each of these systems is calculated on the basis of the nutrient spiralling ecological concept, which is based on residence time and temperature as described in ([[Beusen et al., 2014]]; [[Beusen et al., 2015]]).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27575</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Description</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27575"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:53:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Van Drecht et al., 2009; Cleveland et al., 1999; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description====Wastewater===&lt;br /&gt;
Urban wastewater contains N and P emitted by households and industries that are connected to a sewerage system, and households with sanitation but without a sewerage connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N discharges to surface water (&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;sw&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; in kg per person per year) are calculated as follows ([[Van Drecht et al., 2009]]; [[Morée et al., 2013]]):{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula1 Nutrients}}where:  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hum&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is human N emissions (kg per person per year), &lt;br /&gt;
* D is the proportion of the total population connected to public sewerage systems (no dimension), &lt;br /&gt;
*R N is the overall removal of N through wastewater treatment (no dimension). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total P emissions to surface water are calculated in a similar way, but also include estimates of P emissions to surface water resulting from the use of P-based dishwasher and laundry detergents. Nutrient removal by wastewater treatment R is based on the relative contribution of four classes of treatment (none, primary, secondary and tertiary treatment). D is calculated from the proportion of households with improved sanitation. D and R by treatment class are scenario variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil nutrient budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The soil budget approach ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]) considers all N and P inputs and outputs for IMAGE grid cells. N input terms in the budgets include application of synthetic N fertiliser (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fert&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and animal manure (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;man&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), biological N fixation (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fix&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), and atmospheric N deposition (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dep&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Output terms include N withdrawal from the field through crop harvesting, hay and grass cutting, and grass consumed by grazing animals (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;withdr&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soil N budget (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;budget&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is calculated as follows:{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula2 Nutrients}}  &lt;br /&gt;
The same approach is used for P, with input terms being animal manure and fertiliser. The soil nutrient budget does not include nutrient accumulation in soil organic matter for a positive budget (surplus), or nutrient depletion due to soil organic matter decomposition and mineralisation. With no accumulation, a surplus represents a potential loss to the environment. For N this includes NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation (see Component [[Emissions]]), denitrification, surface runoff and leaching. For P, this is surface runoff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For spatial allocation of the nutrient input to IMAGE grid cells, grass and the crop groups in IMAGE (temperate cereals, rice, maize, tropical cereals, pulses, roots and tubers, oil crops, other crops, energy crops) and grass are aggregated to five broad groups. These groups are grass, wetland rice, leguminous crops, other upland crops and energy crops for both mixed and pastoral production systems (see [[Livestock systems]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertiliser====&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser use is based on nutrient use efficiency, representing crop production in kilograms of dry matter per kilogram of fertiliser N (NUE) and P (PUE). NUE and PUE vary between countries because of differences in crop mix, attainable yield potential, soil quality, amount and form of N and P application and management. In constructing scenarios on fertiliser use, data on the 1970–2005 period serve as a guide to distinguish countries with an input exceeding crop uptake (positive budget or surplus) from countries with a deficit. Generally, farmers in countries with a surplus are assumed to be increasingly efficient in fertiliser use (increasing NUE and PUE). In countries with nutrient deficits, an increase in crop yields is only possible with an increase in the nutrient input. Initially, this will lead to decreasing NUE and PUE, showing a decrease in soil nutrient depletion due to increased fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Manure====&lt;br /&gt;
Total manure production is computed from animal stocks and N and P excretion rates (Figure Flowchart, middle). IMAGE uses constant N and P excretion rates per head for dairy and non-dairy cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats, pigs, poultry, horses, asses, mules and camels. Constant excretion rates imply that the N and P excretion per unit of product decreases with increased milk and meat production per animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N and P in the manure for each animal category are spatially allocated to mixed and pastoral systems. In each country and system, the manure is distributed over three management systems: grazing; storage in animal housing and storage systems; and manure used outside the agricultural system for fuel or other purposes. The quantity of manure assigned to grazing is based on the proportion of grass in feed rations (Figure Flowchart, middle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stored animal manure available for cropland and grassland application includes all stored and collected manure, excluding ammonia volatilisation from animal houses and storage systems. In general, IMAGE assumes that 50% of available animal manure from storage systems is applied to arable land and the rest to grassland in industrialised countries. In most developing countries, 95% of the available manure is spread on croplands and 5% on grassland, thus accounting for the lower economic importance of grass compared to crops in these countries. In the European Union, maximum manure application rates are 170 to 250 kg N per ha , reflecting current regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation====&lt;br /&gt;
Data on biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) are obtained from the N in the harvested product (see nutrient withdrawal) following the approach of ([[Salvagiotti et al., 2008]]). Thus any change in the rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by legumes is the result of yield changes for pulses and soybeans. In addition to leguminous crops, IMAGE uses an annual rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation of 5 kg N per ha for non-leguminous crops and grass, and 25 kg N per ha for wetland rice. N fixation rates in natural ecosystems were based on the low estimates for areal coverage by legumes ([[Cleveland et al., 1999]]) as described by Bouwman et al. ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Atmospheric deposition==== &lt;br /&gt;
Deposition rates for historical and future years are calculated by scaling N deposition field for 2000 (obtained from atmospheric chemistry transport models), using emission inventories for the historical period and N gas emissions in the scenario considered. IMAGE does not include atmospheric P deposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrient withdrawal==== &lt;br /&gt;
Withdrawal of N and P in harvested products is calculated from regional crop production in IMAGE and the N and P content for each crop, which is aggregated to the broad crop categories (wetland rice, leguminous crops, upland crops and energy crops). IMAGE also accounts for uptake by fodder crops. N withdrawal through grass consumption and harvest is assumed to amount to 60% of all N input (manure, fertiliser, deposition, N fixation), excluding NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation. P withdrawal through grazing or grass cutting is calculated as a proportion of 87.5% of fertiliser and manure P input. The rest is assumed to be lost through surface runoff. In calculating spatially nutrient withdrawal, a procedure is used to downscale regional crop production data from IMAGE to country estimates for nutrient withdrawal based on distributions in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nutrient environmental fate===&lt;br /&gt;
Nutrient losses from the plant-soil system to the soil-hydrology system are calculated from the soil nutrient budgets ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]). For N, the budget is corrected for ammonia volatilisation from grazing animals and from fertiliser and manure spreading (see Component [[Emissions]]). P not taken up by plants is generally bound to soil particles, with the only loss pathway being surface runoff. N is more mobile and is transported via surface runoff and through soil, groundwater and riparian zones to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil denitrification and leaching====&lt;br /&gt;
Denitrification is calculated as a proportion of the soil N budget surplus based on the effect of temperature and residence time of water and nitrate in the root zone, and the effects of soil texture, soil drainage and soil organic carbon content. In a soil budget deficit, IMAGE assumes that denitrification does not occur. Leaching is the complement of the soil N budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Groundwater transport, surface runoff and denitrification====&lt;br /&gt;
Two groundwater subsystems are distinguished. One is the shallow groundwater system representing interflow and surface runoff for the upper 5 m of the saturated zone, with short travel times for the water to enter local surface water at short distances or to infiltrate the deep groundwater system. The other is the deep system with a thickness of 50 m with generally long travel times draining to larger streams and rivers. Deep groundwater is assumed to be absent in areas of non-permeable, consolidated rocks or in the presence of surface water. Denitrification during groundwater transport is based on the travel time and the half-life of nitrate. The half-life depends on the lithological class (1 year for schists and shales containing pyrite, 2 years for alluvial material, and 5 years for all other lithological classes). Flows of water and nitrate from shallow groundwater to riparian zones are assumed to be absent in areas with surface water bodies, where the flow is assumed to bypass riparian zones flowing directly to streams or rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denitrification in riparian areas====&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation of denitrification in riparian areas is similar to that in soils, but with two differences: &lt;br /&gt;
# a biologically active layer of 0.3 m thickness is assumed instead of 1 m for other soils; &lt;br /&gt;
# the approach includes the effect of pH on denitrification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Vegetation in floodplains====&lt;br /&gt;
NPP from the LPJ model for wetlands and floodplains are used. Part of annual NPP is assumed to be deposited in the water during flooding, and where flooding is temporary, the litter from preceeding periods is assumed to be available for transport in the flood water.  50% of total NPP is assumed to end in the surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In-stream nutrient retention====&lt;br /&gt;
The water that enters streams and rivers through surface runoff and discharges from groundwater and riparian zones is routed through stream and river channels, and passes through lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. The nutrient retention in each of these systems is calculated on the basis of the nutrient spiralling ecological concept, which is based on residence time and temperature as described in ([[Beusen et al., 2014]]; [[Beusen et al., 2015]]).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Data_uncertainties_limitations&amp;diff=27574</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Data uncertainties limitations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Data_uncertainties_limitations&amp;diff=27574"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:48:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDataUncertaintyAndLimitationsTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=OECD, 2012; FAO, 2012a; Beusen et al., 2008;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;Data,  uncertainties and limitations&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Data===&lt;br /&gt;
The data stem from various parts of IMAGE, such as land cover, biomes, crop production and allocation, livestock, fertiliser use and nutrient excretion rates. Environmental data include temperature and precipitation, runoff, and soil properties (see Input/output Table [[Nutrients|Introduction part]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
External data are used in determining historical N excretion rates, manure spreading and fertiliser use efficiency, but their development in the future is a scenario assumption. Additional information used only in this section includes lithology, relief and slope of the terrain. Additional data used in the nutrient budget model include subnational data as used for the United States, India, Brazil and China. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Uncertainties===&lt;br /&gt;
With regard to uncertainties, the budget calculations and individual input terms for 2000 have been found to be in close agreement ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]) with detailed country estimates for the member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ([[OECD, 2012]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, uncertainty is larger for some budget terms than for others. Data on fertiliser use are more reliable than on N and P animal excretions, which are calculated from livestock data ([[FAO, 2012b]]) and excretion rates per animal category. Data on crop nutrient withdrawal are less certain than on crop production, because the withdrawal is calculated with fixed global nutrient contents of the harvested proportions of marketed crops. In addition to uncertainty in nutrient contents, major uncertainties arise from insufficient data, for instance, on crops that are not marketed and on the use of crop residues. This leads to major uncertainties about nutrient withdrawal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sensitivity analysis ([[Beusen et al., 2015]]) of global nutriënt transport model with data for the year 2000 showed that:&lt;br /&gt;
* runoff is a major factor for N and P delivery, retention and river export.&lt;br /&gt;
* Uptake velocity and all factors used to compute the subgrid in-stream retention are important for total in-stream retention and river export of both N and P&lt;br /&gt;
* Soil N budgets, wastewater and all factors determining litterfall in floodplains are important for N delivery to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
* For P the factors that determine the P content of the soil (soil P content and bulk density) are important factors for P delivery and river export.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sensitivities for the years 1900 and 1950 ([[Beusen et al;., 2016]]) show that inputs from vegetation in floodplains (for N and P) and weathering (for P) are important in the first half of the 20th century, when human activites were not yet overshadowing natural sources of nutrients.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27573</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Description</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27573"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:37:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Van Drecht et al., 2009; Cleveland et al., 1999; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description====Wastewater===&lt;br /&gt;
Urban wastewater contains N and P emitted by households and industries that are connected to a sewerage system, and households with sanitation but without a sewerage connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N discharges to surface water (&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;sw&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; in kg per person per year) are calculated as follows ([[Van Drecht et al., 2009]]; [[Morée et al., 2013]]):{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula1 Nutrients}}where:  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hum&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is human N emissions (kg per person per year), &lt;br /&gt;
* D is the proportion of the total population connected to public sewerage systems (no dimension), &lt;br /&gt;
*R N is the overall removal of N through wastewater treatment (no dimension). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total P emissions to surface water are calculated in a similar way, but also include estimates of P emissions to surface water resulting from the use of P-based dishwasher and laundry detergents. Nutrient removal by wastewater treatment R is based on the relative contribution of four classes of treatment (none, primary, secondary and tertiary treatment). D is calculated from the proportion of households with improved sanitation. D and R by treatment class are scenario variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil nutrient budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The soil budget approach ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]) considers all N and P inputs and outputs for IMAGE grid cells. N input terms in the budgets include application of synthetic N fertiliser (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fert&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and animal manure (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;man&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), biological N fixation (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fix&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), and atmospheric N deposition (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dep&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Output terms include N withdrawal from the field through crop harvesting, hay and grass cutting, and grass consumed by grazing animals (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;withdr&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soil N budget (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;budget&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is calculated as follows:{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula2 Nutrients}}  &lt;br /&gt;
The same approach is used for P, with input terms being animal manure and fertiliser. The soil nutrient budget does not include nutrient accumulation in soil organic matter for a positive budget (surplus), or nutrient depletion due to soil organic matter decomposition and mineralisation. With no accumulation, a surplus represents a potential loss to the environment. For N this includes NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation (see Component [[Emissions]]), denitrification, surface runoff and leaching. For P, this is surface runoff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For spatial allocation of the nutrient input to IMAGE grid cells, grass and the crop groups in IMAGE (temperate cereals, rice, maize, tropical cereals, pulses, roots and tubers, oil crops, other crops, energy crops) and grass are aggregated to five broad groups. These groups are grass, wetland rice, leguminous crops, other upland crops and energy crops for both mixed and pastoral production systems (see [[Livestock systems]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertiliser====&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser use is based on nutrient use efficiency, representing crop production in kilograms of dry matter per kilogram of fertiliser N (NUE) and P (PUE). NUE and PUE vary between countries because of differences in crop mix, attainable yield potential, soil quality, amount and form of N and P application and management. In constructing scenarios on fertiliser use, data on the 1970–2005 period serve as a guide to distinguish countries with an input exceeding crop uptake (positive budget or surplus) from countries with a deficit. Generally, farmers in countries with a surplus are assumed to be increasingly efficient in fertiliser use (increasing NUE and PUE). In countries with nutrient deficits, an increase in crop yields is only possible with an increase in the nutrient input. Initially, this will lead to decreasing NUE and PUE, showing a decrease in soil nutrient depletion due to increased fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Manure====&lt;br /&gt;
Total manure production is computed from animal stocks and N and P excretion rates (Figure Flowchart, middle). IMAGE uses constant N and P excretion rates per head for dairy and non-dairy cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats, pigs, poultry, horses, asses, mules and camels. Constant excretion rates imply that the N and P excretion per unit of product decreases with increased milk and meat production per animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N and P in the manure for each animal category are spatially allocated to mixed and pastoral systems. In each country and system, the manure is distributed over three management systems: grazing; storage in animal housing and storage systems; and manure used outside the agricultural system for fuel or other purposes. The quantity of manure assigned to grazing is based on the proportion of grass in feed rations (Figure Flowchart, middle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stored animal manure available for cropland and grassland application includes all stored and collected manure, excluding ammonia volatilisation from animal houses and storage systems. In general, IMAGE assumes that 50% of available animal manure from storage systems is applied to arable land and the rest to grassland in industrialised countries. In most developing countries, 95% of the available manure is spread on croplands and 5% on grassland, thus accounting for the lower economic importance of grass compared to crops in these countries. In the European Union, maximum manure application rates are 170 to 250 kg N per ha , reflecting current regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation====&lt;br /&gt;
Data on biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) are obtained from the N in the harvested product (see nutrient withdrawal) following the approach of ([[Salvagiotti et al., 2008]]). Thus any change in the rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by legumes is the result of yield changes for pulses and soybeans. In addition to leguminous crops, IMAGE uses an annual rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation of 5 kg N per ha for non-leguminous crops and grass, and 25 kg N per ha for wetland rice. N fixation rates in natural ecosystems were based on the low estimates for areal coverage by legumes ([[Cleveland et al., 1999]]) as described by Bouwman et al. ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Atmospheric deposition==== &lt;br /&gt;
Deposition rates for historical and future years are calculated by scaling N deposition field for 2000 (obtained from atmospheric chemistry transport models), using emission inventories for the historical period and N gas emissions in the scenario considered. IMAGE does not include atmospheric P deposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrient withdrawal==== &lt;br /&gt;
Withdrawal of N and P in harvested products is calculated from regional crop production in IMAGE and the N and P content for each crop, which is aggregated to the broad crop categories (wetland rice, leguminous crops, upland crops and energy crops). IMAGE also accounts for uptake by fodder crops. N withdrawal through grass consumption and harvest is assumed to amount to 60% of all N input (manure, fertiliser, deposition, N fixation), excluding NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation. P withdrawal through grazing or grass cutting is calculated as a proportion of 87.5% of fertiliser and manure P input. The rest is assumed to be lost through surface runoff. In calculating spatially nutrient withdrawal, a procedure is used to downscale regional crop production data from IMAGE to country estimates for nutrient withdrawal based on distributions in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nutrient environmental fate===&lt;br /&gt;
Nutrient losses from the plant-soil system to the soil-hydrology system are calculated from the soil nutrient budgets ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]). For N, the budget is corrected for ammonia volatilisation from grazing animals and from fertiliser and manure spreading (see Component [[Emissions]]). P not taken up by plants is generally bound to soil particles, with the only loss pathway being surface runoff. N is more mobile and is transported via surface runoff and through soil, groundwater and riparian zones to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil denitrification and leaching====&lt;br /&gt;
Denitrification is calculated as a proportion of the soil N budget surplus based on the effect of temperature and residence time of water and nitrate in the root zone, and the effects of soil texture, soil drainage and soil organic carbon content. In a soil budget deficit, IMAGE assumes that denitrification does not occur. Leaching is the complement of the soil N budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Groundwater transport, surface runoff and denitrification====&lt;br /&gt;
Two groundwater subsystems are distinguished. One is the shallow groundwater system representing interflow and surface runoff for the upper 5 m of the saturated zone, with short travel times for the water to enter local surface water at short distances or to infiltrate the deep groundwater system. The other is the deep system with a thickness of 50 m with generally long travel times draining to larger streams and rivers. Deep groundwater is assumed to be absent in areas of non-permeable, consolidated rocks or in the presence of surface water. Denitrification during groundwater transport is based on the travel time and the half-life of nitrate. The half-life depends on the lithological class (1 year for schists and shales containing pyrite, 2 years for alluvial material, and 5 years for all other lithological classes). Flows of water and nitrate from shallow groundwater to riparian zones are assumed to be absent in areas with surface water bodies, where the flow is assumed to bypass riparian zones flowing directly to streams or rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denitrification in riparian areas====&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation of denitrification in riparian areas is similar to that in soils, but with two differences: &lt;br /&gt;
# a biologically active layer of 0.3 m thickness is assumed instead of 1 m for other soils; &lt;br /&gt;
# the approach includes the effect of pH on denitrification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In-stream nutrient retention====&lt;br /&gt;
The water that enters streams and rivers through surface runoff and discharges from groundwater and riparian zones is routed through stream and river channels, and passes through lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. The nutrient retention in each of these systems is calculated on the basis of the nutrient spiralling ecological concept, which is based on residence time and temperature as described in ([[Beusen et al., 2014]]; [[Beusen et al., 2015]]).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients&amp;diff=27572</id>
		<title>Nutrients</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients&amp;diff=27572"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:36:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|Application=Roads from Rio+20 (2012) project; Shared Socioeconomic Pathways - SSP (2014) project; The Protein Puzzle (2011) project;&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Drivers; Agricultural economy; Land-use allocation; Agriculture and land use; Aquatic biodiversity; Emissions; Land cover and land use; Livestock systems;&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Beusen, 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016; Morée et al., 2013;&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Galloway et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2010;  Diaz and Rosenberg, 2008; UNEP, 2002; Rabalais, 2002; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Population - grid; GDP per capita - grid; Land cover, land use - grid; Animal stocks; Livestock rations; Manure spreading fraction; Nitrogen deposition - grid; Actual crop and grass production - grid; Production system mix; Fertiliser use efficiency;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=NH3 emissions - grid; N and P discharge to surface water - grid;  Soil N budget - grid; Soil P budget - grid; N and P in wastewater discharge - grid;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Human activity has accelerated the Earth’s biogeochemical nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycles through increasing fertiliser use in agriculture ([[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]). Increased use of N and P fertilisers has raised food production to support the rapidly growing world population, and increasing per capita consumption particularly of meat and milk ([[Galloway et al., 2004]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The side effect is that significant proportions of the mobilised N are lost through ambient emissions of ammonia (NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O) and nitric oxide (NO). Ammonia contributes to eutrophication and acidification when deposited on land. Nitric oxide plays a role in tropospheric ozone chemistry, and nitrous oxide is a potent greenhouse gas. Moreover, large proportions of mobilised N and P in watersheds enter the groundwater through leaching, and are released to surface waters through groundwater transport and surface runoff. Subsequently, nutrients in streams and rivers are transported to coastal marine systems, reduced by retention but augmented by releases from point sources, such as sewerage systems and industrial facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has resulted in negative impacts on human health and the environment, such as groundwater pollution, loss of habitat and biodiversity, an increases in the frequency and severity of harmful algal blooms, eutrophication, hypoxia and fish kills ([[Diaz and Rosenberg, 2008]]; [[Zhang et al., 2010]]). The harmful effects of eutrophication have spread rapidly around the world, with large-scale implications for biodiversity, water quality, fisheries and recreation, in both industrialised and developing regions ([[UNEP, 2002]]). Input of nutrients in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems, also disturbs the stoichiometric balance of N, P and Si (silicon) ([[Rabalais, 2002]]) affecting total plant production and the species composition in ecosystems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To assess eutrophication as a consequence of increasing population, and economic and technological development, IMAGE 3.0 includes a nutrient model ([[Beusen, 2014]]; [[Beusen et al., 2015]]; [[Beusen et al., 2016]]), which comprises three sub-models:&lt;br /&gt;
# Wastewater module calculating nutrient flows in wastewater discharges (Figure Flowchart, top);&lt;br /&gt;
# Soil nutrient budget module describing all input and output of N and P in soil compartments (Figure Flowchart, middle);&lt;br /&gt;
# Nutrient environmental fate describing the fate of soil nutrient surpluses and wastewater nutrients in the aquatic environment (Figure Flowchart, bottom).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=N&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=state component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients&amp;diff=27571</id>
		<title>Nutrients</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients&amp;diff=27571"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:36:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|Application=Roads from Rio+20 (2012) project; Shared Socioeconomic Pathways - SSP (2014) project; The Protein Puzzle (2011) project;&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Drivers; Agricultural economy; Land-use allocation; Agriculture and land use; Aquatic biodiversity; Emissions; Land cover and land use; Livestock systems;&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Beusen, 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016; Morée et al., 2013;&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Galloway et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2010;  Diaz and Rosenberg, 2008; UNEP, 2002; Rabalais, 2002; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Population - grid; GDP per capita - grid; Land cover, land use - grid; Animal stocks; Livestock rations; Manure spreading fraction; Nitrogen deposition - grid; Actual crop and grass production - grid; Production system mix; Fertiliser use efficiency;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=NH3 emissions - grid; N and P discharge to surface water - grid;  Soil N budget - grid; Soil P budget - grid; N and P in wastewater discharge - grid;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Human activity has accelerated the Earth’s biogeochemical nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycles through increasing fertiliser use in agriculture ([[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]). Increased use of N and P fertilisers has raised food production to support the rapidly growing world population, and increasing per capita consumption particularly of meat and milk ([[Galloway et al., 2004]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The side effect is that significant proportions of the mobilised N are lost through ambient emissions of ammonia (NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O) and nitric oxide (NO). Ammonia contributes to eutrophication and acidification when deposited on land. Nitric oxide plays a role in tropospheric ozone chemistry, and nitrous oxide is a potent greenhouse gas. Moreover, large proportions of mobilised N and P in watersheds enter the groundwater through leaching, and are released to surface waters through groundwater transport and surface runoff. Subsequently, nutrients in streams and rivers are transported to coastal marine systems, reduced by retention but augmented by releases from point sources, such as sewerage systems and industrial facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has resulted in negative impacts on human health and the environment, such as groundwater pollution, loss of habitat and biodiversity, an increases in the frequency and severity of harmful algal blooms, eutrophication, hypoxia and fish kills ([[Diaz and Rosenberg, 2008]]; [[Zhang et al., 2010]]). The harmful effects of eutrophication have spread rapidly around the world, with large-scale implications for biodiversity, water quality, fisheries and recreation, in both industrialised and developing regions ([[UNEP, 2002]]). Input of nutrients in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems, also disturbs the stoichiometric balance of N, P and Si (silicon) ([[Rabalais, 2002]]) affecting total plant production and the species composition in ecosystems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To assess eutrophication as a consequence of increasing population, and economic and technological development, IMAGE 3.0 includes a nutrient model ([[[Beusen, 2014]]]; [[[Beusen et al., 2015]]]; [[[Beusen et al., 2016]]]), which comprises three sub-models:&lt;br /&gt;
# Wastewater module calculating nutrient flows in wastewater discharges (Figure Flowchart, top);&lt;br /&gt;
# Soil nutrient budget module describing all input and output of N and P in soil compartments (Figure Flowchart, middle);&lt;br /&gt;
# Nutrient environmental fate describing the fate of soil nutrient surpluses and wastewater nutrients in the aquatic environment (Figure Flowchart, bottom).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=N&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=state component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients&amp;diff=27570</id>
		<title>Nutrients</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients&amp;diff=27570"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:35:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|Application=Roads from Rio+20 (2012) project; Shared Socioeconomic Pathways - SSP (2014) project; The Protein Puzzle (2011) project;&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Drivers; Agricultural economy; Land-use allocation; Agriculture and land use; Aquatic biodiversity; Emissions; Land cover and land use; Livestock systems;&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Beusen, 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016; Morée et al., 2013;&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Galloway et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2010;  Diaz and Rosenberg, 2008; UNEP, 2002; Rabalais, 2002; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Population - grid; GDP per capita - grid; Land cover, land use - grid; Animal stocks; Livestock rations; Manure spreading fraction; Nitrogen deposition - grid; Actual crop and grass production - grid; Production system mix; Fertiliser use efficiency;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=NH3 emissions - grid; N and P discharge to surface water - grid;  Soil N budget - grid; Soil P budget - grid; N and P in wastewater discharge - grid;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Human activity has accelerated the Earth’s biogeochemical nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycles through increasing fertiliser use in agriculture ([[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]). Increased use of N and P fertilisers has raised food production to support the rapidly growing world population, and increasing per capita consumption particularly of meat and milk ([[Galloway et al., 2004]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The side effect is that significant proportions of the mobilised N are lost through ambient emissions of ammonia (NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O) and nitric oxide (NO). Ammonia contributes to eutrophication and acidification when deposited on land. Nitric oxide plays a role in tropospheric ozone chemistry, and nitrous oxide is a potent greenhouse gas. Moreover, large proportions of mobilised N and P in watersheds enter the groundwater through leaching, and are released to surface waters through groundwater transport and surface runoff. Subsequently, nutrients in streams and rivers are transported to coastal marine systems, reduced by retention but augmented by releases from point sources, such as sewerage systems and industrial facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has resulted in negative impacts on human health and the environment, such as groundwater pollution, loss of habitat and biodiversity, an increases in the frequency and severity of harmful algal blooms, eutrophication, hypoxia and fish kills ([[Diaz and Rosenberg, 2008]]; [[Zhang et al., 2010]]). The harmful effects of eutrophication have spread rapidly around the world, with large-scale implications for biodiversity, water quality, fisheries and recreation, in both industrialised and developing regions ([[UNEP, 2002]]). Input of nutrients in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems, also disturbs the stoichiometric balance of N, P and Si (silicon) ([[Rabalais, 2002]]) affecting total plant production and the species composition in ecosystems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To assess eutrophication as a consequence of increasing population, and economic and technological development, IMAGE 3.0 includes a nutrient model ([[[Beusen, 2014][]; [[[Beusen et al., 2015][]; [[[Beusen et al., 2016]]]), which comprises three sub-models:&lt;br /&gt;
# Wastewater module calculating nutrient flows in wastewater discharges (Figure Flowchart, top);&lt;br /&gt;
# Soil nutrient budget module describing all input and output of N and P in soil compartments (Figure Flowchart, middle);&lt;br /&gt;
# Nutrient environmental fate describing the fate of soil nutrient surpluses and wastewater nutrients in the aquatic environment (Figure Flowchart, bottom).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=N&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=state component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients&amp;diff=27569</id>
		<title>Nutrients</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients&amp;diff=27569"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:34:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|Application=Roads from Rio+20 (2012) project; Shared Socioeconomic Pathways - SSP (2014) project; The Protein Puzzle (2011) project;&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Drivers; Agricultural economy; Land-use allocation; Agriculture and land use; Aquatic biodiversity; Emissions; Land cover and land use; Livestock systems;&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Beusen, 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016; Morée et al., 2013;&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Galloway et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2010;  Diaz and Rosenberg, 2008; UNEP, 2002; Rabalais, 2002; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Population - grid; GDP per capita - grid; Land cover, land use - grid; Animal stocks; Livestock rations; Manure spreading fraction; Nitrogen deposition - grid; Actual crop and grass production - grid; Production system mix; Fertiliser use efficiency;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=NH3 emissions - grid; N and P discharge to surface water - grid;  Soil N budget - grid; Soil P budget - grid; N and P in wastewater discharge - grid;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Human activity has accelerated the Earth’s biogeochemical nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycles through increasing fertiliser use in agriculture ([[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]). Increased use of N and P fertilisers has raised food production to support the rapidly growing world population, and increasing per capita consumption particularly of meat and milk ([[Galloway et al., 2004]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The side effect is that significant proportions of the mobilised N are lost through ambient emissions of ammonia (NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O) and nitric oxide (NO). Ammonia contributes to eutrophication and acidification when deposited on land. Nitric oxide plays a role in tropospheric ozone chemistry, and nitrous oxide is a potent greenhouse gas. Moreover, large proportions of mobilised N and P in watersheds enter the groundwater through leaching, and are released to surface waters through groundwater transport and surface runoff. Subsequently, nutrients in streams and rivers are transported to coastal marine systems, reduced by retention but augmented by releases from point sources, such as sewerage systems and industrial facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has resulted in negative impacts on human health and the environment, such as groundwater pollution, loss of habitat and biodiversity, an increases in the frequency and severity of harmful algal blooms, eutrophication, hypoxia and fish kills ([[Diaz and Rosenberg, 2008]]; [[Zhang et al., 2010]]). The harmful effects of eutrophication have spread rapidly around the world, with large-scale implications for biodiversity, water quality, fisheries and recreation, in both industrialised and developing regions ([[UNEP, 2002]]). Input of nutrients in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems, also disturbs the stoichiometric balance of N, P and Si (silicon) ([[Rabalais, 2002]]) affecting total plant production and the species composition in ecosystems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To assess eutrophication as a consequence of increasing population, and economic and technological development, IMAGE 3.0 includes a nutrient model ([[[Beusen, 2014][]; [[[Beusen et al., 2015][]; [[[Beusen et al., 2016][]), which comprises three sub-models:&lt;br /&gt;
# Wastewater module calculating nutrient flows in wastewater discharges (Figure Flowchart, top);&lt;br /&gt;
# Soil nutrient budget module describing all input and output of N and P in soil compartments (Figure Flowchart, middle);&lt;br /&gt;
# Nutrient environmental fate describing the fate of soil nutrient surpluses and wastewater nutrients in the aquatic environment (Figure Flowchart, bottom).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=N&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=state component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27568</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Description</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27568"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:33:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Van Drecht et al., 2009; Cleveland et al., 1999; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description====Wastewater===&lt;br /&gt;
Urban wastewater contains N and P emitted by households and industries that are connected to a sewerage system, and households with sanitation but without a sewerage connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N discharges to surface water (&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;sw&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; in kg per person per year) are calculated as follows ([[Van Drecht et al., 2009]]; [[Morée et al., 2013]]):{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula1 Nutrients}}where:  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hum&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is human N emissions (kg per person per year), &lt;br /&gt;
* D is the proportion of the total population connected to public sewerage systems (no dimension), &lt;br /&gt;
*R N is the overall removal of N through wastewater treatment (no dimension). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total P emissions to surface water are calculated in a similar way, but also include estimates of P emissions to surface water resulting from the use of P-based dishwasher and laundry detergents. Nutrient removal by wastewater treatment R is based on the relative contribution of four classes of treatment (none, primary, secondary and tertiary treatment). D is calculated from the proportion of households with improved sanitation. D and R by treatment class are scenario variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil nutrient budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The soil budget approach ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]) considers all N and P inputs and outputs for IMAGE grid cells. N input terms in the budgets include application of synthetic N fertiliser (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fert&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and animal manure (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;man&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), biological N fixation (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fix&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), and atmospheric N deposition (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dep&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Output terms include N withdrawal from the field through crop harvesting, hay and grass cutting, and grass consumed by grazing animals (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;withdr&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soil N budget (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;budget&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is calculated as follows:{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula2 Nutrients}}  &lt;br /&gt;
The same approach is used for P, with input terms being animal manure and fertiliser. The soil nutrient budget does not include nutrient accumulation in soil organic matter for a positive budget (surplus), or nutrient depletion due to soil organic matter decomposition and mineralisation. With no accumulation, a surplus represents a potential loss to the environment. For N this includes NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation (see Component [[Emissions]]), denitrification, surface runoff and leaching. For P, this is surface runoff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For spatial allocation of the nutrient input to IMAGE grid cells, grass and the crop groups in IMAGE (temperate cereals, rice, maize, tropical cereals, pulses, roots and tubers, oil crops, other crops, energy crops) and grass are aggregated to five broad groups. These groups are grass, wetland rice, leguminous crops, other upland crops and energy crops for both mixed and pastoral production systems (see [[Livestock systems]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertiliser====&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser use is based on nutrient use efficiency, representing crop production in kilograms of dry matter per kilogram of fertiliser N (NUE) and P (PUE). NUE and PUE vary between countries because of differences in crop mix, attainable yield potential, soil quality, amount and form of N and P application and management. In constructing scenarios on fertiliser use, data on the 1970–2005 period serve as a guide to distinguish countries with an input exceeding crop uptake (positive budget or surplus) from countries with a deficit. Generally, farmers in countries with a surplus are assumed to be increasingly efficient in fertiliser use (increasing NUE and PUE). In countries with nutrient deficits, an increase in crop yields is only possible with an increase in the nutrient input. Initially, this will lead to decreasing NUE and PUE, showing a decrease in soil nutrient depletion due to increased fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Manure====&lt;br /&gt;
Total manure production is computed from animal stocks and N and P excretion rates (Figure Flowchart, middle). IMAGE uses constant N and P excretion rates per head for dairy and non-dairy cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats, pigs, poultry, horses, asses, mules and camels. Constant excretion rates imply that the N and P excretion per unit of product decreases with increased milk and meat production per animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N and P in the manure for each animal category are spatially allocated to mixed and pastoral systems. In each country and system, the manure is distributed over three management systems: grazing; storage in animal housing and storage systems; and manure used outside the agricultural system for fuel or other purposes. The quantity of manure assigned to grazing is based on the proportion of grass in feed rations (Figure Flowchart, middle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stored animal manure available for cropland and grassland application includes all stored and collected manure, excluding ammonia volatilisation from animal houses and storage systems. In general, IMAGE assumes that 50% of available animal manure from storage systems is applied to arable land and the rest to grassland in industrialised countries. In most developing countries, 95% of the available manure is spread on croplands and 5% on grassland, thus accounting for the lower economic importance of grass compared to crops in these countries. In the European Union, maximum manure application rates are 170 to 250 kg N per ha , reflecting current regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation====&lt;br /&gt;
Data on biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) are obtained from the N in the harvested product (see nutrient withdrawal) following the approach of ([[Salvagiotti et al., 2008]]). Thus any change in the rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by legumes is the result of yield changes for pulses and soybeans. In addition to leguminous crops, IMAGE uses an annual rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation of 5 kg N per ha for non-leguminous crops and grass, and 25 kg N per ha for wetland rice. N fixation rates in natural ecosystems were based on the low estimates for areal coverage by legumes ([[Cleveland et al., 1999]]) as described by Bouwman et al. ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Atmospheric deposition==== &lt;br /&gt;
Deposition rates for historical and future years are calculated by scaling N deposition field for 2000 (obtained from atmospheric chemistry transport models), using emission inventories for the historical period and N gas emissions in the scenario considered. IMAGE does not include atmospheric P deposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrient withdrawal==== &lt;br /&gt;
Withdrawal of N and P in harvested products is calculated from regional crop production in IMAGE and the N and P content for each crop, which is aggregated to the broad crop categories (wetland rice, leguminous crops, upland crops and energy crops). IMAGE also accounts for uptake by fodder crops. N withdrawal through grass consumption and harvest is assumed to amount to 60% of all N input (manure, fertiliser, deposition, N fixation), excluding NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation. P withdrawal through grazing or grass cutting is calculated as a proportion of 87.5% of fertiliser and manure P input. The rest is assumed to be lost through surface runoff. In calculating spatially nutrient withdrawal, a procedure is used to downscale regional crop production data from IMAGE to country estimates for nutrient withdrawal based on distributions in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nutrient environmental fate===&lt;br /&gt;
Nutrient losses from the plant-soil system to the soil-hydrology system are calculated from the soil nutrient budgets ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]). For N, the budget is corrected for ammonia volatilisation from grazing animals and from fertiliser and manure spreading (see Component [[Emissions]]). P not taken up by plants is generally bound to soil particles, with the only loss pathway being surface runoff. N is more mobile and is transported via surface runoff and through soil, groundwater and riparian zones to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil denitrification and leaching====&lt;br /&gt;
Denitrification is calculated as a proportion of the soil N budget surplus based on the effect of temperature and residence time of water and nitrate in the root zone, and the effects of soil texture, soil drainage and soil organic carbon content. In a soil budget deficit, IMAGE assumes that denitrification does not occur. Leaching is the complement of the soil N budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Groundwater transport, surface runoff and denitrification====&lt;br /&gt;
Two groundwater subsystems are distinguished. One is the shallow groundwater system representing interflow and surface runoff for the upper 5 m of the saturated zone, with short travel times for the water to enter local surface water at short distances or to infiltrate the deep groundwater system. The other is the deep system with a thickness of 50 m with generally long travel times draining to larger streams and rivers. Deep groundwater is assumed to be absent in areas of non-permeable, consolidated rocks or in the presence of surface water. Denitrification during groundwater transport is based on the travel time and the half-life of nitrate. The half-life depends on the lithological class (1 year for schists and shales containing pyrite, 2 years for alluvial material, and 5 years for all other lithological classes). Flows of water and nitrate from shallow groundwater to riparian zones are assumed to be absent in areas with surface water bodies, where the flow is assumed to bypass riparian zones flowing directly to streams or rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denitrification in riparian areas====&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation of denitrification in riparian areas is similar to that in soils, but with two differences: &lt;br /&gt;
# a biologically active layer of 0.3 m thickness is assumed instead of 1 m for other soils; &lt;br /&gt;
# the approach includes the effect of pH on denitrification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In-stream nutrient retention====&lt;br /&gt;
The water that enters streams and rivers through surface runoff and discharges from groundwater and riparian zones is routed through stream and river channels, and passes through lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. The nutrient retention in each of these systems is calculated on the basis of the nutrient spiralling ecological concept, which is based on residence time and temperature as described in ([[Beusen et al., 2014][Beusen et al., 2015]]).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27567</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Description</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27567"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:32:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Van Drecht et al., 2009; Cleveland et al., 1999; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description====Wastewater===&lt;br /&gt;
Urban wastewater contains N and P emitted by households and industries that are connected to a sewerage system, and households with sanitation but without a sewerage connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N discharges to surface water (&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;sw&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; in kg per person per year) are calculated as follows ([[Van Drecht et al., 2009]]; [[Morée et al., 2013]]):{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula1 Nutrients}}where:  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hum&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is human N emissions (kg per person per year), &lt;br /&gt;
* D is the proportion of the total population connected to public sewerage systems (no dimension), &lt;br /&gt;
*R N is the overall removal of N through wastewater treatment (no dimension). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total P emissions to surface water are calculated in a similar way, but also include estimates of P emissions to surface water resulting from the use of P-based dishwasher and laundry detergents. Nutrient removal by wastewater treatment R is based on the relative contribution of four classes of treatment (none, primary, secondary and tertiary treatment). D is calculated from the proportion of households with improved sanitation. D and R by treatment class are scenario variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil nutrient budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The soil budget approach ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]) considers all N and P inputs and outputs for IMAGE grid cells. N input terms in the budgets include application of synthetic N fertiliser (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fert&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and animal manure (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;man&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), biological N fixation (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fix&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), and atmospheric N deposition (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dep&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Output terms include N withdrawal from the field through crop harvesting, hay and grass cutting, and grass consumed by grazing animals (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;withdr&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soil N budget (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;budget&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is calculated as follows:{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula2 Nutrients}}  &lt;br /&gt;
The same approach is used for P, with input terms being animal manure and fertiliser. The soil nutrient budget does not include nutrient accumulation in soil organic matter for a positive budget (surplus), or nutrient depletion due to soil organic matter decomposition and mineralisation. With no accumulation, a surplus represents a potential loss to the environment. For N this includes NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation (see Component [[Emissions]]), denitrification, surface runoff and leaching. For P, this is surface runoff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For spatial allocation of the nutrient input to IMAGE grid cells, grass and the crop groups in IMAGE (temperate cereals, rice, maize, tropical cereals, pulses, roots and tubers, oil crops, other crops, energy crops) and grass are aggregated to five broad groups. These groups are grass, wetland rice, leguminous crops, other upland crops and energy crops for both mixed and pastoral production systems (see [[Livestock systems]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertiliser====&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser use is based on nutrient use efficiency, representing crop production in kilograms of dry matter per kilogram of fertiliser N (NUE) and P (PUE). NUE and PUE vary between countries because of differences in crop mix, attainable yield potential, soil quality, amount and form of N and P application and management. In constructing scenarios on fertiliser use, data on the 1970–2005 period serve as a guide to distinguish countries with an input exceeding crop uptake (positive budget or surplus) from countries with a deficit. Generally, farmers in countries with a surplus are assumed to be increasingly efficient in fertiliser use (increasing NUE and PUE). In countries with nutrient deficits, an increase in crop yields is only possible with an increase in the nutrient input. Initially, this will lead to decreasing NUE and PUE, showing a decrease in soil nutrient depletion due to increased fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Manure====&lt;br /&gt;
Total manure production is computed from animal stocks and N and P excretion rates (Figure Flowchart, middle). IMAGE uses constant N and P excretion rates per head for dairy and non-dairy cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats, pigs, poultry, horses, asses, mules and camels. Constant excretion rates imply that the N and P excretion per unit of product decreases with increased milk and meat production per animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N and P in the manure for each animal category are spatially allocated to mixed and pastoral systems. In each country and system, the manure is distributed over three management systems: grazing; storage in animal housing and storage systems; and manure used outside the agricultural system for fuel or other purposes. The quantity of manure assigned to grazing is based on the proportion of grass in feed rations (Figure Flowchart, middle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stored animal manure available for cropland and grassland application includes all stored and collected manure, excluding ammonia volatilisation from animal houses and storage systems. In general, IMAGE assumes that 50% of available animal manure from storage systems is applied to arable land and the rest to grassland in industrialised countries. In most developing countries, 95% of the available manure is spread on croplands and 5% on grassland, thus accounting for the lower economic importance of grass compared to crops in these countries. In the European Union, maximum manure application rates are 170 to 250 kg N per ha , reflecting current regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation====&lt;br /&gt;
Data on biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) are obtained from the N in the harvested product (see nutrient withdrawal) following the approach of ([[Salvagiotti et al., 2008]]). Thus any change in the rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by legumes is the result of yield changes for pulses and soybeans. In addition to leguminous crops, IMAGE uses an annual rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation of 5 kg N per ha for non-leguminous crops and grass, and 25 kg N per ha for wetland rice. N fixation rates in natural ecosystems were based on the low estimates for areal coverage by legumes ([[Cleveland et al., 1999]]) as described by Bouwman et al. ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Atmospheric deposition==== &lt;br /&gt;
Deposition rates for historical and future years are calculated by scaling N deposition field for 2000 (obtained from atmospheric chemistry transport models), using emission inventories for the historical period and N gas emissions in the scenario considered. IMAGE does not include atmospheric P deposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrient withdrawal==== &lt;br /&gt;
Withdrawal of N and P in harvested products is calculated from regional crop production in IMAGE and the N and P content for each crop, which is aggregated to the broad crop categories (wetland rice, leguminous crops, upland crops and energy crops). IMAGE also accounts for uptake by fodder crops. N withdrawal through grass consumption and harvest is assumed to amount to 60% of all N input (manure, fertiliser, deposition, N fixation), excluding NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation. P withdrawal through grazing or grass cutting is calculated as a proportion of 87.5% of fertiliser and manure P input. The rest is assumed to be lost through surface runoff. In calculating spatially nutrient withdrawal, a procedure is used to downscale regional crop production data from IMAGE to country estimates for nutrient withdrawal based on distributions in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nutrient environmental fate===&lt;br /&gt;
Nutrient losses from the plant-soil system to the soil-hydrology system are calculated from the soil nutrient budgets ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]). For N, the budget is corrected for ammonia volatilisation from grazing animals and from fertiliser and manure spreading (see Component [[Emissions]]). P not taken up by plants is generally bound to soil particles, with the only loss pathway being surface runoff. N is more mobile and is transported via surface runoff and through soil, groundwater and riparian zones to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil denitrification and leaching====&lt;br /&gt;
Denitrification is calculated as a proportion of the soil N budget surplus based on the effect of temperature and residence time of water and nitrate in the root zone, and the effects of soil texture, soil drainage and soil organic carbon content. In a soil budget deficit, IMAGE assumes that denitrification does not occur. Leaching is the complement of the soil N budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Groundwater transport, surface runoff and denitrification====&lt;br /&gt;
Two groundwater subsystems are distinguished. One is the shallow groundwater system representing interflow and surface runoff for the upper 5 m of the saturated zone, with short travel times for the water to enter local surface water at short distances or to infiltrate the deep groundwater system. The other is the deep system with a thickness of 50 m with generally long travel times draining to larger streams and rivers. Deep groundwater is assumed to be absent in areas of non-permeable, consolidated rocks or in the presence of surface water. Denitrification during groundwater transport is based on the travel time and the half-life of nitrate. The half-life depends on the lithological class (1 year for schists and shales containing pyrite, 2 years for alluvial material, and 5 years for all other lithological classes). Flows of water and nitrate from shallow groundwater to riparian zones are assumed to be absent in areas with surface water bodies, where the flow is assumed to bypass riparian zones flowing directly to streams or rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denitrification in riparian areas====&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation of denitrification in riparian areas is similar to that in soils, but with two differences: &lt;br /&gt;
# a biologically active layer of 0.3 m thickness is assumed instead of 1 m for other soils; &lt;br /&gt;
# the approach includes the effect of pH on denitrification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In-stream nutrient retention====&lt;br /&gt;
The water that enters streams and rivers through surface runoff and discharges from groundwater and riparian zones is routed through stream and river channels, and passes through lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. The nutrient retention in each of these systems is calculated on the basis of the nutrient spiralling ecological concept, which is based on residence time and temperature as described in ([[Beusen et al., 2014] [Beusen et al., 2015]]).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27566</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Description</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27566"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:32:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Van Drecht et al., 2009; Cleveland et al., 1999; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description====Wastewater===&lt;br /&gt;
Urban wastewater contains N and P emitted by households and industries that are connected to a sewerage system, and households with sanitation but without a sewerage connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N discharges to surface water (&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;sw&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; in kg per person per year) are calculated as follows ([[Van Drecht et al., 2009]]; [[Morée et al., 2013]]):{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula1 Nutrients}}where:  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hum&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is human N emissions (kg per person per year), &lt;br /&gt;
* D is the proportion of the total population connected to public sewerage systems (no dimension), &lt;br /&gt;
*R N is the overall removal of N through wastewater treatment (no dimension). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total P emissions to surface water are calculated in a similar way, but also include estimates of P emissions to surface water resulting from the use of P-based dishwasher and laundry detergents. Nutrient removal by wastewater treatment R is based on the relative contribution of four classes of treatment (none, primary, secondary and tertiary treatment). D is calculated from the proportion of households with improved sanitation. D and R by treatment class are scenario variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil nutrient budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The soil budget approach ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]) considers all N and P inputs and outputs for IMAGE grid cells. N input terms in the budgets include application of synthetic N fertiliser (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fert&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and animal manure (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;man&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), biological N fixation (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fix&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), and atmospheric N deposition (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dep&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Output terms include N withdrawal from the field through crop harvesting, hay and grass cutting, and grass consumed by grazing animals (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;withdr&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soil N budget (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;budget&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is calculated as follows:{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula2 Nutrients}}  &lt;br /&gt;
The same approach is used for P, with input terms being animal manure and fertiliser. The soil nutrient budget does not include nutrient accumulation in soil organic matter for a positive budget (surplus), or nutrient depletion due to soil organic matter decomposition and mineralisation. With no accumulation, a surplus represents a potential loss to the environment. For N this includes NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation (see Component [[Emissions]]), denitrification, surface runoff and leaching. For P, this is surface runoff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For spatial allocation of the nutrient input to IMAGE grid cells, grass and the crop groups in IMAGE (temperate cereals, rice, maize, tropical cereals, pulses, roots and tubers, oil crops, other crops, energy crops) and grass are aggregated to five broad groups. These groups are grass, wetland rice, leguminous crops, other upland crops and energy crops for both mixed and pastoral production systems (see [[Livestock systems]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertiliser====&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser use is based on nutrient use efficiency, representing crop production in kilograms of dry matter per kilogram of fertiliser N (NUE) and P (PUE). NUE and PUE vary between countries because of differences in crop mix, attainable yield potential, soil quality, amount and form of N and P application and management. In constructing scenarios on fertiliser use, data on the 1970–2005 period serve as a guide to distinguish countries with an input exceeding crop uptake (positive budget or surplus) from countries with a deficit. Generally, farmers in countries with a surplus are assumed to be increasingly efficient in fertiliser use (increasing NUE and PUE). In countries with nutrient deficits, an increase in crop yields is only possible with an increase in the nutrient input. Initially, this will lead to decreasing NUE and PUE, showing a decrease in soil nutrient depletion due to increased fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Manure====&lt;br /&gt;
Total manure production is computed from animal stocks and N and P excretion rates (Figure Flowchart, middle). IMAGE uses constant N and P excretion rates per head for dairy and non-dairy cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats, pigs, poultry, horses, asses, mules and camels. Constant excretion rates imply that the N and P excretion per unit of product decreases with increased milk and meat production per animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N and P in the manure for each animal category are spatially allocated to mixed and pastoral systems. In each country and system, the manure is distributed over three management systems: grazing; storage in animal housing and storage systems; and manure used outside the agricultural system for fuel or other purposes. The quantity of manure assigned to grazing is based on the proportion of grass in feed rations (Figure Flowchart, middle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stored animal manure available for cropland and grassland application includes all stored and collected manure, excluding ammonia volatilisation from animal houses and storage systems. In general, IMAGE assumes that 50% of available animal manure from storage systems is applied to arable land and the rest to grassland in industrialised countries. In most developing countries, 95% of the available manure is spread on croplands and 5% on grassland, thus accounting for the lower economic importance of grass compared to crops in these countries. In the European Union, maximum manure application rates are 170 to 250 kg N per ha , reflecting current regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation====&lt;br /&gt;
Data on biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) are obtained from the N in the harvested product (see nutrient withdrawal) following the approach of ([[Salvagiotti et al., 2008]]). Thus any change in the rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by legumes is the result of yield changes for pulses and soybeans. In addition to leguminous crops, IMAGE uses an annual rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation of 5 kg N per ha for non-leguminous crops and grass, and 25 kg N per ha for wetland rice. N fixation rates in natural ecosystems were based on the low estimates for areal coverage by legumes ([[Cleveland et al., 1999]]) as described by Bouwman et al. ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Atmospheric deposition==== &lt;br /&gt;
Deposition rates for historical and future years are calculated by scaling N deposition field for 2000 (obtained from atmospheric chemistry transport models), using emission inventories for the historical period and N gas emissions in the scenario considered. IMAGE does not include atmospheric P deposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrient withdrawal==== &lt;br /&gt;
Withdrawal of N and P in harvested products is calculated from regional crop production in IMAGE and the N and P content for each crop, which is aggregated to the broad crop categories (wetland rice, leguminous crops, upland crops and energy crops). IMAGE also accounts for uptake by fodder crops. N withdrawal through grass consumption and harvest is assumed to amount to 60% of all N input (manure, fertiliser, deposition, N fixation), excluding NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation. P withdrawal through grazing or grass cutting is calculated as a proportion of 87.5% of fertiliser and manure P input. The rest is assumed to be lost through surface runoff. In calculating spatially nutrient withdrawal, a procedure is used to downscale regional crop production data from IMAGE to country estimates for nutrient withdrawal based on distributions in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nutrient environmental fate===&lt;br /&gt;
Nutrient losses from the plant-soil system to the soil-hydrology system are calculated from the soil nutrient budgets ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]). For N, the budget is corrected for ammonia volatilisation from grazing animals and from fertiliser and manure spreading (see Component [[Emissions]]). P not taken up by plants is generally bound to soil particles, with the only loss pathway being surface runoff. N is more mobile and is transported via surface runoff and through soil, groundwater and riparian zones to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil denitrification and leaching====&lt;br /&gt;
Denitrification is calculated as a proportion of the soil N budget surplus based on the effect of temperature and residence time of water and nitrate in the root zone, and the effects of soil texture, soil drainage and soil organic carbon content. In a soil budget deficit, IMAGE assumes that denitrification does not occur. Leaching is the complement of the soil N budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Groundwater transport, surface runoff and denitrification====&lt;br /&gt;
Two groundwater subsystems are distinguished. One is the shallow groundwater system representing interflow and surface runoff for the upper 5 m of the saturated zone, with short travel times for the water to enter local surface water at short distances or to infiltrate the deep groundwater system. The other is the deep system with a thickness of 50 m with generally long travel times draining to larger streams and rivers. Deep groundwater is assumed to be absent in areas of non-permeable, consolidated rocks or in the presence of surface water. Denitrification during groundwater transport is based on the travel time and the half-life of nitrate. The half-life depends on the lithological class (1 year for schists and shales containing pyrite, 2 years for alluvial material, and 5 years for all other lithological classes). Flows of water and nitrate from shallow groundwater to riparian zones are assumed to be absent in areas with surface water bodies, where the flow is assumed to bypass riparian zones flowing directly to streams or rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denitrification in riparian areas====&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation of denitrification in riparian areas is similar to that in soils, but with two differences: &lt;br /&gt;
# a biologically active layer of 0.3 m thickness is assumed instead of 1 m for other soils; &lt;br /&gt;
# the approach includes the effect of pH on denitrification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In-stream nutrient retention====&lt;br /&gt;
The water that enters streams and rivers through surface runoff and discharges from groundwater and riparian zones is routed through stream and river channels, and passes through lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. The nutrient retention in each of these systems is calculated on the basis of the nutrient spiralling ecological concept, which is based on residence time and temperature as described in ([[Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015]]).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27565</id>
		<title>Nutrients/Description</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients/Description&amp;diff=27565"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:31:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Van Drecht et al., 2009; Cleveland et al., 1999; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; Beusen et al., 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016; &lt;br /&gt;
|Description====Wastewater===&lt;br /&gt;
Urban wastewater contains N and P emitted by households and industries that are connected to a sewerage system, and households with sanitation but without a sewerage connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N discharges to surface water (&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;sw&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; in kg per person per year) are calculated as follows ([[Van Drecht et al., 2009]]; [[Morée et al., 2013]]):{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula1 Nutrients}}where:  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;hum&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is human N emissions (kg per person per year), &lt;br /&gt;
* D is the proportion of the total population connected to public sewerage systems (no dimension), &lt;br /&gt;
*R N is the overall removal of N through wastewater treatment (no dimension). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total P emissions to surface water are calculated in a similar way, but also include estimates of P emissions to surface water resulting from the use of P-based dishwasher and laundry detergents. Nutrient removal by wastewater treatment R is based on the relative contribution of four classes of treatment (none, primary, secondary and tertiary treatment). D is calculated from the proportion of households with improved sanitation. D and R by treatment class are scenario variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil nutrient budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The soil budget approach ([[Bouwman et al., 2009]]; [[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]) considers all N and P inputs and outputs for IMAGE grid cells. N input terms in the budgets include application of synthetic N fertiliser (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fert&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and animal manure (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;man&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), biological N fixation (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fix&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), and atmospheric N deposition (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dep&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Output terms include N withdrawal from the field through crop harvesting, hay and grass cutting, and grass consumed by grazing animals (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;withdr&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The soil N budget (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;budget&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is calculated as follows:{{FormulaAndTableTemplate|Formula2 Nutrients}}  &lt;br /&gt;
The same approach is used for P, with input terms being animal manure and fertiliser. The soil nutrient budget does not include nutrient accumulation in soil organic matter for a positive budget (surplus), or nutrient depletion due to soil organic matter decomposition and mineralisation. With no accumulation, a surplus represents a potential loss to the environment. For N this includes NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation (see Component [[Emissions]]), denitrification, surface runoff and leaching. For P, this is surface runoff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For spatial allocation of the nutrient input to IMAGE grid cells, grass and the crop groups in IMAGE (temperate cereals, rice, maize, tropical cereals, pulses, roots and tubers, oil crops, other crops, energy crops) and grass are aggregated to five broad groups. These groups are grass, wetland rice, leguminous crops, other upland crops and energy crops for both mixed and pastoral production systems (see [[Livestock systems]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertiliser====&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser use is based on nutrient use efficiency, representing crop production in kilograms of dry matter per kilogram of fertiliser N (NUE) and P (PUE). NUE and PUE vary between countries because of differences in crop mix, attainable yield potential, soil quality, amount and form of N and P application and management. In constructing scenarios on fertiliser use, data on the 1970–2005 period serve as a guide to distinguish countries with an input exceeding crop uptake (positive budget or surplus) from countries with a deficit. Generally, farmers in countries with a surplus are assumed to be increasingly efficient in fertiliser use (increasing NUE and PUE). In countries with nutrient deficits, an increase in crop yields is only possible with an increase in the nutrient input. Initially, this will lead to decreasing NUE and PUE, showing a decrease in soil nutrient depletion due to increased fertiliser use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Manure====&lt;br /&gt;
Total manure production is computed from animal stocks and N and P excretion rates (Figure Flowchart, middle). IMAGE uses constant N and P excretion rates per head for dairy and non-dairy cattle, buffaloes, sheep and goats, pigs, poultry, horses, asses, mules and camels. Constant excretion rates imply that the N and P excretion per unit of product decreases with increased milk and meat production per animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
N and P in the manure for each animal category are spatially allocated to mixed and pastoral systems. In each country and system, the manure is distributed over three management systems: grazing; storage in animal housing and storage systems; and manure used outside the agricultural system for fuel or other purposes. The quantity of manure assigned to grazing is based on the proportion of grass in feed rations (Figure Flowchart, middle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stored animal manure available for cropland and grassland application includes all stored and collected manure, excluding ammonia volatilisation from animal houses and storage systems. In general, IMAGE assumes that 50% of available animal manure from storage systems is applied to arable land and the rest to grassland in industrialised countries. In most developing countries, 95% of the available manure is spread on croplands and 5% on grassland, thus accounting for the lower economic importance of grass compared to crops in these countries. In the European Union, maximum manure application rates are 170 to 250 kg N per ha , reflecting current regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation====&lt;br /&gt;
Data on biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) are obtained from the N in the harvested product (see nutrient withdrawal) following the approach of ([[Salvagiotti et al., 2008]]). Thus any change in the rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation by legumes is the result of yield changes for pulses and soybeans. In addition to leguminous crops, IMAGE uses an annual rate of biological N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fixation of 5 kg N per ha for non-leguminous crops and grass, and 25 kg N per ha for wetland rice. N fixation rates in natural ecosystems were based on the low estimates for areal coverage by legumes ([[Cleveland et al., 1999]]) as described by Bouwman et al. ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Atmospheric deposition==== &lt;br /&gt;
Deposition rates for historical and future years are calculated by scaling N deposition field for 2000 (obtained from atmospheric chemistry transport models), using emission inventories for the historical period and N gas emissions in the scenario considered. IMAGE does not include atmospheric P deposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nutrient withdrawal==== &lt;br /&gt;
Withdrawal of N and P in harvested products is calculated from regional crop production in IMAGE and the N and P content for each crop, which is aggregated to the broad crop categories (wetland rice, leguminous crops, upland crops and energy crops). IMAGE also accounts for uptake by fodder crops. N withdrawal through grass consumption and harvest is assumed to amount to 60% of all N input (manure, fertiliser, deposition, N fixation), excluding NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; volatilisation. P withdrawal through grazing or grass cutting is calculated as a proportion of 87.5% of fertiliser and manure P input. The rest is assumed to be lost through surface runoff. In calculating spatially nutrient withdrawal, a procedure is used to downscale regional crop production data from IMAGE to country estimates for nutrient withdrawal based on distributions in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nutrient environmental fate===&lt;br /&gt;
Nutrient losses from the plant-soil system to the soil-hydrology system are calculated from the soil nutrient budgets ([[Bouwman et al., 2013a]]). For N, the budget is corrected for ammonia volatilisation from grazing animals and from fertiliser and manure spreading (see Component [[Emissions]]). P not taken up by plants is generally bound to soil particles, with the only loss pathway being surface runoff. N is more mobile and is transported via surface runoff and through soil, groundwater and riparian zones to surface water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil denitrification and leaching====&lt;br /&gt;
Denitrification is calculated as a proportion of the soil N budget surplus based on the effect of temperature and residence time of water and nitrate in the root zone, and the effects of soil texture, soil drainage and soil organic carbon content. In a soil budget deficit, IMAGE assumes that denitrification does not occur. Leaching is the complement of the soil N budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Groundwater transport, surface runoff and denitrification====&lt;br /&gt;
Two groundwater subsystems are distinguished. One is the shallow groundwater system representing interflow and surface runoff for the upper 5 m of the saturated zone, with short travel times for the water to enter local surface water at short distances or to infiltrate the deep groundwater system. The other is the deep system with a thickness of 50 m with generally long travel times draining to larger streams and rivers. Deep groundwater is assumed to be absent in areas of non-permeable, consolidated rocks or in the presence of surface water. Denitrification during groundwater transport is based on the travel time and the half-life of nitrate. The half-life depends on the lithological class (1 year for schists and shales containing pyrite, 2 years for alluvial material, and 5 years for all other lithological classes). Flows of water and nitrate from shallow groundwater to riparian zones are assumed to be absent in areas with surface water bodies, where the flow is assumed to bypass riparian zones flowing directly to streams or rivers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Denitrification in riparian areas====&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation of denitrification in riparian areas is similar to that in soils, but with two differences: &lt;br /&gt;
# a biologically active layer of 0.3 m thickness is assumed instead of 1 m for other soils; &lt;br /&gt;
# the approach includes the effect of pH on denitrification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In-stream nutrient retention====&lt;br /&gt;
The water that enters streams and rivers through surface runoff and discharges from groundwater and riparian zones is routed through stream and river channels, and passes through lakes, wetlands and reservoirs. The nutrient retention in each of these systems is calculated on the basis of the nutrient spiralling ecological concept, which is based on residence time and temperature as described in ([[Beusen et al., 2014]]).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients&amp;diff=27564</id>
		<title>Nutrients</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients&amp;diff=27564"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:27:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|Application=Roads from Rio+20 (2012) project; Shared Socioeconomic Pathways - SSP (2014) project; The Protein Puzzle (2011) project;&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Drivers; Agricultural economy; Land-use allocation; Agriculture and land use; Aquatic biodiversity; Emissions; Land cover and land use; Livestock systems;&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Beusen, 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016; Morée et al., 2013;&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Galloway et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2010;  Diaz and Rosenberg, 2008; UNEP, 2002; Rabalais, 2002; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Population - grid; GDP per capita - grid; Land cover, land use - grid; Animal stocks; Livestock rations; Manure spreading fraction; Nitrogen deposition - grid; Actual crop and grass production - grid; Production system mix; Fertiliser use efficiency;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=NH3 emissions - grid; N and P discharge to surface water - grid;  Soil N budget - grid; Soil P budget - grid; N and P in wastewater discharge - grid;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Human activity has accelerated the Earth’s biogeochemical nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycles through increasing fertiliser use in agriculture ([[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]). Increased use of N and P fertilisers has raised food production to support the rapidly growing world population, and increasing per capita consumption particularly of meat and milk ([[Galloway et al., 2004]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The side effect is that significant proportions of the mobilised N are lost through ambient emissions of ammonia (NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O) and nitric oxide (NO). Ammonia contributes to eutrophication and acidification when deposited on land. Nitric oxide plays a role in tropospheric ozone chemistry, and nitrous oxide is a potent greenhouse gas. Moreover, large proportions of mobilised N and P in watersheds enter the groundwater through leaching, and are released to surface waters through groundwater transport and surface runoff. Subsequently, nutrients in streams and rivers are transported to coastal marine systems, reduced by retention but augmented by releases from point sources, such as sewerage systems and industrial facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has resulted in negative impacts on human health and the environment, such as groundwater pollution, loss of habitat and biodiversity, an increases in the frequency and severity of harmful algal blooms, eutrophication, hypoxia and fish kills ([[Diaz and Rosenberg, 2008]]; [[Zhang et al., 2010]]). The harmful effects of eutrophication have spread rapidly around the world, with large-scale implications for biodiversity, water quality, fisheries and recreation, in both industrialised and developing regions ([[UNEP, 2002]]). Input of nutrients in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems, also disturbs the stoichiometric balance of N, P and Si (silicon) ([[Rabalais, 2002]]) affecting total plant production and the species composition in ecosystems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To assess eutrophication as a consequence of increasing population, and economic and technological development, IMAGE 3.0 includes a nutrient model ([[Beusen, 2014; Beusen et al., 2015; Beusen et al., 2016]]), which comprises three sub-models:&lt;br /&gt;
# Wastewater module calculating nutrient flows in wastewater discharges (Figure Flowchart, top);&lt;br /&gt;
# Soil nutrient budget module describing all input and output of N and P in soil compartments (Figure Flowchart, middle);&lt;br /&gt;
# Nutrient environmental fate describing the fate of soil nutrient surpluses and wastewater nutrients in the aquatic environment (Figure Flowchart, bottom).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=N&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=state component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Beusen_et_al.,_2015&amp;diff=27563</id>
		<title>Beusen et al., 2015</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Beusen_et_al.,_2015&amp;diff=27563"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:25:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: Created page with &amp;quot;{{ReferenceTemplate |Author=Beusen, A. H. W., Van Beek, L. P. H., Bouwman, A. F., Mogollón, J. M., and Middelburg, J. J. |Year=2015 |Title=Coupling global models for hydrolog...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ReferenceTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Author=Beusen, A. H. W., Van Beek, L. P. H., Bouwman, A. F., Mogollón, J. M., and Middelburg, J. J.&lt;br /&gt;
|Year=2015&lt;br /&gt;
|Title=Coupling global models for hydrology and nutrient loading to simulate nitrogen and phosphorus retention in surface water. Description of image-gnm and analysis of performance&lt;br /&gt;
|DOI=DOI: 4010.5194/gmd-4048-4045-2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PublicationType=Journal article&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume5=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher=&lt;br /&gt;
|City=&lt;br /&gt;
|ISBN=&lt;br /&gt;
|BookTitle=&lt;br /&gt;
|Editor=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher2=&lt;br /&gt;
|City2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume=&lt;br /&gt;
|Pages=&lt;br /&gt;
|ISBN2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Editor2=&lt;br /&gt;
|SeriesTitle=&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume4=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher3=&lt;br /&gt;
|City3=&lt;br /&gt;
|ISBN3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Editor3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Institution=&lt;br /&gt;
|ReportNumber=&lt;br /&gt;
|SeriesTitle2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher5=&lt;br /&gt;
|City5=&lt;br /&gt;
|Journal=Geoscientific Model Development&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume2=8&lt;br /&gt;
|Pages2= 4045–4067&lt;br /&gt;
|SecondaryTitle=&lt;br /&gt;
|SecondaryAuthor=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher4=&lt;br /&gt;
|City4=&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Pages3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Date=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/4048/4045/2015/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Beusen_et_al.,_2016&amp;diff=27562</id>
		<title>Beusen et al., 2016</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Beusen_et_al.,_2016&amp;diff=27562"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:23:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ReferenceTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Author=Beusen, A. H. W., Bouwman, A. F., Van Beek, L. P. H., Mogollón, J. M., and Middelburg, J. J.&lt;br /&gt;
|Year=2016&lt;br /&gt;
|Title=Global riverine n and p transport to ocean increased during the 20th century despite increased retention along the aquatic continuum&lt;br /&gt;
|DOI=10.5194/bg-13-2441-2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PublicationType=Journal article&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume5=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher=&lt;br /&gt;
|City=&lt;br /&gt;
|ISBN=&lt;br /&gt;
|BookTitle=&lt;br /&gt;
|Editor=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher2=&lt;br /&gt;
|City2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume=&lt;br /&gt;
|Pages=&lt;br /&gt;
|ISBN2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Editor2=&lt;br /&gt;
|SeriesTitle=&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume4=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher3=&lt;br /&gt;
|City3=&lt;br /&gt;
|ISBN3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Editor3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Institution=&lt;br /&gt;
|ReportNumber=&lt;br /&gt;
|SeriesTitle2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher5=&lt;br /&gt;
|City5=&lt;br /&gt;
|Journal=Biogeosciences&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume2=13&lt;br /&gt;
|Pages2=2441-2451&lt;br /&gt;
|SecondaryTitle=&lt;br /&gt;
|SecondaryAuthor=&lt;br /&gt;
|Publisher4=&lt;br /&gt;
|City4=&lt;br /&gt;
|Volume3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Pages3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Date=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.biogeosciences.net/13/2441/2016/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients&amp;diff=27561</id>
		<title>Nutrients</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Nutrients&amp;diff=27561"/>
		<updated>2016-11-02T12:16:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Bouwmanl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|Application=Roads from Rio+20 (2012) project; Shared Socioeconomic Pathways - SSP (2014) project; The Protein Puzzle (2011) project;&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Drivers; Agricultural economy; Land-use allocation; Agriculture and land use; Aquatic biodiversity; Emissions; Land cover and land use; Livestock systems;&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Beusen, 2014; Bouwman et al., 2013a; Bouwman et al., 2009; Morée et al., 2013;&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Bouwman et al., 2013c; Galloway et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2010;  Diaz and Rosenberg, 2008; UNEP, 2002; Rabalais, 2002;&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Population - grid; GDP per capita - grid; Land cover, land use - grid; Animal stocks; Livestock rations; Manure spreading fraction; Nitrogen deposition - grid; Actual crop and grass production - grid; Production system mix; Fertiliser use efficiency;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=NH3 emissions - grid; N and P discharge to surface water - grid;  Soil N budget - grid; Soil P budget - grid; N and P in wastewater discharge - grid;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Human activity has accelerated the Earth’s biogeochemical nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycles through increasing fertiliser use in agriculture ([[Bouwman et al., 2013c]]). Increased use of N and P fertilisers has raised food production to support the rapidly growing world population, and increasing per capita consumption particularly of meat and milk ([[Galloway et al., 2004]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The side effect is that significant proportions of the mobilised N are lost through ambient emissions of ammonia (NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), nitrous oxide (N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O) and nitric oxide (NO). Ammonia contributes to eutrophication and acidification when deposited on land. Nitric oxide plays a role in tropospheric ozone chemistry, and nitrous oxide is a potent greenhouse gas. Moreover, large proportions of mobilised N and P in watersheds enter the groundwater through leaching, and are released to surface waters through groundwater transport and surface runoff. Subsequently, nutrients in streams and rivers are transported to coastal marine systems, reduced by retention but augmented by releases from point sources, such as sewerage systems and industrial facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has resulted in negative impacts on human health and the environment, such as groundwater pollution, loss of habitat and biodiversity, an increases in the frequency and severity of harmful algal blooms, eutrophication, hypoxia and fish kills ([[Diaz and Rosenberg, 2008]]; [[Zhang et al., 2010]]). The harmful effects of eutrophication have spread rapidly around the world, with large-scale implications for biodiversity, water quality, fisheries and recreation, in both industrialised and developing regions ([[UNEP, 2002]]). Input of nutrients in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems, also disturbs the stoichiometric balance of N, P and Si (silicon) ([[Rabalais, 2002]]) affecting total plant production and the species composition in ecosystems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To assess eutrophication as a consequence of increasing population, and economic and technological development, IMAGE 3.0 includes a nutrient model ([[Beusen, 2014; Beusen et al.; Beusen et al. 2]]), which comprises three sub-models:&lt;br /&gt;
# Wastewater module calculating nutrient flows in wastewater discharges (Figure Flowchart, top);&lt;br /&gt;
# Soil nutrient budget module describing all input and output of N and P in soil compartments (Figure Flowchart, middle);&lt;br /&gt;
# Nutrient environmental fate describing the fate of soil nutrient surpluses and wastewater nutrients in the aquatic environment (Figure Flowchart, bottom).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=N&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=state component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bouwmanl</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>