<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://models.pbl.nl/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JellevanMinnen</id>
	<title>IMAGE - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://models.pbl.nl/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JellevanMinnen"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/image/Special:Contributions/JellevanMinnen"/>
	<updated>2026-09-20T18:52:58Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.15</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=REDD_policies&amp;diff=20065</id>
		<title>REDD policies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=REDD_policies&amp;diff=20065"/>
		<updated>2014-04-04T08:26:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Agricultural economy and forestry&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=The objective of REDD policies it to reduce land-use related emissions by protecting existing forests in the world; The implementation of REDD includes also costs of policies.&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Overmars et al., 2012;&lt;br /&gt;
|ClimateThemeItem=Climate mitigation (Climate)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Agricultural economy and forestry&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Increases the cost for land expansion in certain regions, favouring the use of other external inputs to increase production.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Emissions&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Less emissions due to deforestation and land-use change&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=REDD measures can substantially reduce the pressure on forests. This increases the extent of natural forests, &lt;br /&gt;
and the net CO2 uptake and C pools of forests.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=REDD_policies&amp;diff=20064</id>
		<title>REDD policies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=REDD_policies&amp;diff=20064"/>
		<updated>2014-04-04T08:23:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Agricultural economy and forestry&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=The protection of forests by REDD policies with the aim of reducing land-use related emissions; The implementation of REDD includes also costs of policies.&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Overmars et al., 2012;&lt;br /&gt;
|ClimateThemeItem=Climate mitigation (Climate)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Agricultural economy and forestry&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Increases the cost for land expansion in certain regions, favouring the use of other external inputs to increase production.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Emissions&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Less emissions due to deforestation and land-use change&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=REDD measures can substantially reduce the pressure on forests. This increases the extent of natural forests, &lt;br /&gt;
and the net CO2 uptake and C pools of forests.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=More_sustainable_forest_management&amp;diff=20063</id>
		<title>More sustainable forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=More_sustainable_forest_management&amp;diff=20063"/>
		<updated>2014-04-04T08:17:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Forest management;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Sustainable forest management aims for maintaining long-term harvest potential and good ecological status of forests (e.g. the nutrient balance and biodiversity). This can be implemented by (i) enlarging the return period when a forest can be harvested again; (ii) only using certain fractions of the harvested biomass and leave the remaining part in the forests.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Because forests might supply less timber,  more sustainable forest management lead to more forests to be used throughout the world (assuming no change in demand). &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Sustainable forest management has an effect on the C storage in vegetation and soil of forests, and it enhances the net CO2 uptake by the forests (as degradation is avoided).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=More_sustainable_forest_management&amp;diff=20062</id>
		<title>More sustainable forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=More_sustainable_forest_management&amp;diff=20062"/>
		<updated>2014-04-04T08:14:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Forest management;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Sustainable forest management aims for maintaining long-term harvest potential and good ecological status of forests (e.g. the nutrient balance and biodiversity). This can be implemented by (i) enlarging the return period when a forest can be harvest again; (ii) only using certain fractions of the harvested biomass and leave the remaining part in the forests. &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Because forests might supply less timber,  more sustainable forest management lead to more forests in the world to be used&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Sustainable forest management has an effect on the C storage in vegetation and soil of forests, and it enhances the net CO2 uptake by the forests (as degradation is avoided).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Expanding_Reduced_Impact_Logging&amp;diff=20060</id>
		<title>Expanding Reduced Impact Logging</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Expanding_Reduced_Impact_Logging&amp;diff=20060"/>
		<updated>2014-04-04T08:02:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Increasing the share of produced wood yielded with Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) practices instead of conventional logging practices.&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=PBL, 2010;&lt;br /&gt;
|LanduseThemeItem=Forestry (Land use)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=RIL affects the forest management in two ways: (i) Less land being used for forestry as it increases the  harvest efficiency (due to less losses); (ii) less available forest residues that could, for example, be used for energy production.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=RIL can change the volume of the C pools in the soil and vegetation pools and reduces the human induced land-use change emissions.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Terrestrial biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=The impacts on biodiversity is lower using RIL practices instead of the conventional practices. This because (i) less forets will be used (higher biodiversity on large scale); (ii) a better and faster regrowth of the harvested forests, also thus a long-term increasing biodiversity also within these forests.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Increase_forest_plantations&amp;diff=20057</id>
		<title>Increase forest plantations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Increase_forest_plantations&amp;diff=20057"/>
		<updated>2014-04-04T07:44:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Increase the use of wood from highly productive wood plantations instead of wood from (semi-) natural forests.&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=PBL, 2010;&lt;br /&gt;
|LanduseThemeItem=Forestry (Land use); Other land use (Land use)&lt;br /&gt;
|NatureThemeItem=Terrestrial biodiversity (NB)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Decreases the area impacted by forestry/logging&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=This intervention changes the regional C pools and fluxes. It limits the exploitation of (natural) forests and preserves the C budgets within these forests. In the plantations the C pools might become reduced. &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Terrestrial biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Terrestrial biodiversity is effected in two ways: 1) the area with forestry impacts will be smaller, and 2) the biodiversity value of plantations will be lower than (semi-)natural forests in which logging takes place.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Increase_forest_plantations&amp;diff=20056</id>
		<title>Increase forest plantations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Increase_forest_plantations&amp;diff=20056"/>
		<updated>2014-04-04T07:31:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Increase the use of wood from highly productive wood plantations instead of wood from (semi-) natural forests.&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=PBL, 2010;&lt;br /&gt;
|LanduseThemeItem=Forestry (Land use); Other land use (Land use)&lt;br /&gt;
|NatureThemeItem=Terrestrial biodiversity (NB)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=this intervention decreases the area impacted by forestry/logging&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Forest management options including enhanced plantation establishment have an effect on the C pools in the terrestrial biosphere and the CO2 exchange between biosphere and atmosphere (NPP, NEP).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Terrestrial biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Terrestrial biodiversity is effected in two ways: 1) the area with forestry impacts will be smaller, and 2) the biodiversity value of plantations will be lower than (semi-)natural forests in which logging takes place.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=More_sustainable_forest_management&amp;diff=20055</id>
		<title>More sustainable forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=More_sustainable_forest_management&amp;diff=20055"/>
		<updated>2014-04-04T07:28:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Forest management;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Policies for a more sustainable forest management focus on harvesting in a way that the harvest does not exceed regrowth, in order to maintain the long-term harvest potential. Plus it should maintain the ecological status of forests, e.g. the nutrient balance and biodiversity. This can be achieved in the model by (i) limiting the return period (returning only when forest is fully regrown); (ii) using only certain fractions of the harvested biomass and leave the remaining part in the forests.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Sustainable forest management has an effect on the forest management throughout the world (like the clear logging extent). Because the timber demand is not affected, more sustainable forest management might lead to more forests used.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Sustainable forest management has a clear effect on the extent of the terrestrial biomass pools (in vegetation and soil), and the terrestrial CO2 uptake by the forests (as degradation is avoided).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Soil_properties_-_grid&amp;diff=19973</id>
		<title>Soil properties - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Soil_properties_-_grid&amp;diff=19973"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T11:06:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Soil properties&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Soil properties that have an effect on vegetation growth and hydrology. These characteristics differ between soil types. Relevant characteristics are soil texture and depth and water holding capacity&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=external parameter&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=FAO; &lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=HWSD (Harmonized World Soil Database)&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=FAO et al., 2009;&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=FAO et al., 2009;&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Traditional_biomass_from_non-forest_land&amp;diff=19965</id>
		<title>Traditional biomass from non-forest land</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Traditional_biomass_from_non-forest_land&amp;diff=19965"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T10:52:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Fraction from non-forested land&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Part of the global energy demand is met by fuel wood, depending on the world region. For the developed regions, it is assumed in IMAGE that fuel wood is produced on a large scale and, therefore all fuel wood demand is added to timber demand. In the transitional regions as well as in the developing regions, smaller fractions of the fuel wood demand are assumed to be met from forestry operations: 50% and 32%.&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=external parameter&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=FAO; &lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=FAO, 2001; FAO, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=FAO, 2001; FAO, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management_type_-_grid&amp;diff=19964</id>
		<title>Forest management type - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management_type_-_grid&amp;diff=19964"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T10:47:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Forest management type, ie. how timber harvest should occur in a grid cell (clear cut, selective logging, wood plantation or additional deforestation)&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (from/to model)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=REDD_policies&amp;diff=19961</id>
		<title>REDD policies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=REDD_policies&amp;diff=19961"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T10:32:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Agricultural economy and forestry&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=The protection of forests by REDD policies with the aim of reducing emissions; costs of policies are included&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Overmars et al., 2012;&lt;br /&gt;
|ClimateThemeItem=Climate mitigation (Climate)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Agricultural economy and forestry&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Increases the cost for land expansion in certain regions, favouring the use of other external inputs to increase production.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Emissions&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Less emissions due to deforestation and land-use change&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=REDD measures can substantially reduce the pressure on forests. The has an effect on the extent of natural forests, the C pools within forests and the net CO2 exchange between the biosphere and atmosphere. &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Expanding_Reduced_Impact_Logging&amp;diff=19960</id>
		<title>Expanding Reduced Impact Logging</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Expanding_Reduced_Impact_Logging&amp;diff=19960"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T10:23:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Increasing the share of produced wood yielded with Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) practices instead of conventional logging practices.&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=PBL, 2010;&lt;br /&gt;
|LanduseThemeItem=Forestry (Land use)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Increasing RIL can lead to considerably increase in timber harvest (=less losses) and thus less land being used for forestry. &lt;br /&gt;
Increasing RIL also result in less available forest residues that could, for example, be used for energy production. &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Because of more effective harvest and less losses, increasing RIL will change the volume of the C pools in the soil and vegetation pools. And because of less losses also the human induced land-use change emissions become smaller. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Terrestrial biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=The impacts on biodiversity is lower using RIL practices instead of the conventional practices. This because (i) less forets will be used (higher biodiversity on large scale); (ii) a better and faster regrowth of the harvested forests, also thus a long-term increasing biodiversity also within these forests. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=More_sustainable_forest_management&amp;diff=19959</id>
		<title>More sustainable forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=More_sustainable_forest_management&amp;diff=19959"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T10:11:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Forest management;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Policies for a more sustainable forest management focus on harvesting in a way that the harvest does not exceed regrowth, in order to maintain the long-term harvest potential. Plus it should maintain the ecological status of forests, e.g. the nutrient balance and biodiversity. This can be achieved in teh model by (i) limiting the return period (returning only when forest is fully regrown); (ii) using only certain fractions of the harvested biomass and leave teh remaining part in the forests. &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Sustainable forest management has an effect on the forest management throughtout te world (like the clear logging extent). Because the timber demand is not affected, more sustainable forest management might lead to more forests used. &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Sustainable foret management has a clear effect on the extent of the terrestrial biomass pools (in vegetation and soil), and the terrestrial CO2 uptake by the forests (as degradation is avoided). &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Increase_forest_plantations&amp;diff=19958</id>
		<title>Increase forest plantations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Increase_forest_plantations&amp;diff=19958"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T09:56:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Increase the use of wood from highly productive wood plantations instead of wood from (semi-) natural forests.&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=PBL, 2010;&lt;br /&gt;
|LanduseThemeItem=Forestry (Land use); Other land use (Land use)&lt;br /&gt;
|NatureThemeItem=Terrestrial biodiversity (NB)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=this intervention decreases the area impacted by forestry/logging&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Forest management options inlcuding enhanced plantation establishment has an effect on the C pools in the terrestrial biosphere and the CO2 exchange between biosphere and atmosphere (NPP, NEP).  &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Terrestrial biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Terrestrial biodiversity is effected in two ways: 1) the area with forestry impacts will be smaller, and 2) the biodiversity value of plantations will be lower than (semi-)natural forests in which logging takes place.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Soil_respiration_-_grid&amp;diff=19934</id>
		<title>Soil respiration - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Soil_respiration_-_grid&amp;diff=19934"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T09:08:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Soil Respiration -grid -&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=CO2 release from soils into the atmosphere due to the decay of soil carbon pools and respiration of soil organisms.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit=ton C per ha per yr&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (end-indicator)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=NPP_(net_primary_production)_-_grid&amp;diff=19932</id>
		<title>NPP (net primary production) - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=NPP_(net_primary_production)_-_grid&amp;diff=19932"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T09:02:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Net Primairy Production - grid-&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=The CO2 sequestered by plants that is allocated to and incorporated in new tissue in the different plant carbon pools&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit=ton C per ha per yr&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (end-indicator)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Carbon_pools_in_soil_and_timber_-_grid&amp;diff=19931</id>
		<title>Carbon pools in soil and timber - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Carbon_pools_in_soil_and_timber_-_grid&amp;diff=19931"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T08:54:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Carbon biomass in 3 soil pools (litter, humusm charcoal) and 2 timber pools (slow decaying = sawlogs, and fast decaying = paper/pulp)&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (end-indicator)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Carbon_pools_in_soil_and_timber_-_grid&amp;diff=19930</id>
		<title>Carbon pools in soil and timber - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Carbon_pools_in_soil_and_timber_-_grid&amp;diff=19930"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T08:49:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Carbon biomass in 4 vegetation pools (levaes, branches, stems and roots), 3 soil pools (litter, humusm charcoal) and 2 timber pools (slow decaying = sawlogs, and fast decaying = paper/pulp)&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (end-indicator)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Land-use_CO2_emissions_-_grid&amp;diff=19928</id>
		<title>Land-use CO2 emissions - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Land-use_CO2_emissions_-_grid&amp;diff=19928"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T08:45:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Terrestrial CO2 emission&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=CO2 emissions from deforestation and wood harvest, harvest carbon flux from agricultural land, biofuel plantations and timber decay&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, region&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit=ton C per ha per yr&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (from/to model)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Land-use_CO2_emissions_-_grid&amp;diff=19925</id>
		<title>Land-use CO2 emissions - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Land-use_CO2_emissions_-_grid&amp;diff=19925"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T08:44:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Terrestrial CO2 emission&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=CO2 emissions from deforestation and wood harvest, harvest carbon flux from agricultural land, biofuel plantations and timber decay&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, region&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit=Pg C yr&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. ha&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (from/to model)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Potential_natural_vegetation_-_grid&amp;diff=19907</id>
		<title>Potential natural vegetation - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Potential_natural_vegetation_-_grid&amp;diff=19907"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T07:43:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Potential natural vegetation&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Potential natural vegetation, using fysical drivers (i.e. climate, soil characteristics, competition strength)&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (from/to model)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
For vegetation types see the [[Land cover types]] page&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Precipitation_-_grid&amp;diff=19906</id>
		<title>Precipitation - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Precipitation_-_grid&amp;diff=19906"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T07:41:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Monthly precipitation&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Monthly total precipitation per grid cell&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit=mm per month&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (from/to model)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Temperature_-_grid&amp;diff=19905</id>
		<title>Temperature - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Temperature_-_grid&amp;diff=19905"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T07:40:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Temperature&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Monthly average temperature per grid cell&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit=°C per month&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (from/to model)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=NEP_(net_ecosystem_production)_-_grid&amp;diff=19904</id>
		<title>NEP (net ecosystem production) - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=NEP_(net_ecosystem_production)_-_grid&amp;diff=19904"/>
		<updated>2014-04-03T07:39:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Net ecosystem production&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Net natural exchange of CO2 between the biosphere and atmosphere. It is the different of NPP (an uptake) and soil respiration (emission). A positive value depicts and uptakeIt does not include human induced fluxes like emissions due to deforestation and teh decay of wood products. &lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit=ton C per ha per yr&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (from/to model)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Expanding_Reduced_Impact_Logging&amp;diff=19902</id>
		<title>Expanding Reduced Impact Logging</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Expanding_Reduced_Impact_Logging&amp;diff=19902"/>
		<updated>2014-04-02T15:46:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Increasing the share of produced wood yielded with Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) practices instead of conventional logging practices.&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=PBL, 2010;&lt;br /&gt;
|LanduseThemeItem=Forestry (Land use)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Increasing RIL can lead to considerably increase in timber harvest (=less losses) and thus less land being used for forestry&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Terrestrial biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=The impacts on biodiversity is lower using RIL practices instead of the conventional practices.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Expanding_Reduced_Impact_Logging&amp;diff=19901</id>
		<title>Expanding Reduced Impact Logging</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Expanding_Reduced_Impact_Logging&amp;diff=19901"/>
		<updated>2014-04-02T15:45:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PolicyInterventionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Component=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Increasing the share of produced wood yielded with Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) practices instead of conventional logging practices.&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=PBL, 2010;&lt;br /&gt;
|LanduseThemeItem=Forestry (Land use)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Forest management&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=Increasing RIL can lead to considerably less land being used for forestry &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectOnComponent=Terrestrial biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
|EffectDescription=The impacts on biodiversity is lower using RIL practices instead of the conventional practices.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19273</id>
		<title>Forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19273"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T12:43:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Scenario drivers; Agricultural systems; Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Arets et al., 2011; &lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Timber demand; Demand for traditional biomass; Fraction selective cut;Land cover, land use - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid; Fraction cut down; Forest plantation demand; Suitability rules; Harvesting efficiency; FAO deforestation rates;&lt;br /&gt;
|Parameter=Fraction from non-forested land;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=Timber use fraction; Timber harvest fraction - grid; Forest residues; Forest management - grid; Regrowth forest area - grid; Harvested Wood; Degraded forest area;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description==== Global context ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world’s total forest area and other wooded land area of 2010 was estimated at just over 40 and 11 million km2 , respectively (FAO, 2010). People use these forests as resources for a multitude of purposes, such as for timber, fuel, food, water and other forest-related goods and services. Notwithstanding the undisputed market and non-market value of forests, the total global forest area continues to decline, with distinct differences between world regions. Total global deforestation has decreased over the last decade, but still occurs at a significant scale in large parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. At the same time, net forest expansion takes place in other regions, such as in Europe and China. Agricultural expansion is the main pressure that drives deforestation. In addition to the loss of forest area, degradation processes and a decline in the supply of services may occur as a result of the human use of forests. Managing global forest resources in a sustainable way may help to preserve forests, slow down or reverse the degradation process, while conserving their biodiversity and carbon stocks (FAO, 2010). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several types of forest management systems are in use to meet worldwide demand, for timber, paper, fibre board, biofuel and other products. Management practices depend on forest type, conservation policies and regulation, economics, and other –often local– factors. Practices differ with respect to the volume of wood harvested per area, the rotation cycle and the carbon content and state of biodiversity of the forested areas. Harvested wood  is  used for various purposes, such as for timber, pulp, paper, traditional fuel wood and modern forms of bio-energy. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Forestry in the IMAGE 3.0 model ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the importance of forest management for the functioning and state of forests, its modelling has become an integral part of the IMAGE 3.0 model. The model simulates an forest area in 2010 of total about 46 million km2. As such the area is somewhat larger than observed, due to the fact that the model does not include other wooded land (see Carbon Cycle and Natural Vegetation module for details). To manage these forests three types of systems are defined in IMAGE 3.0  as a simplification of the whole range of existing forest management systems (Carle and Holmgren, 2008; Arets et al., 2011). The purpose of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) is to preserve forests and their production capacity and biodiversity for future generations, and to counteract forest degradation processes. In IMAGE, several elements of SFM can be included, subject to policy options,  consisting for example of shifts in the mix of  forest management systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first type of forest management included in IMAGE, is that of clearcutting (or clearfelling). This is a management system by which all trees in an area are cut down, after which regrowth can take place, either naturally or ‘assisted’. It is applied often in temperate regions, where stands are often monocultures of specific endemic species. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second type is that of selective logging, in which only the trees with the highest economic value are felled. This is more common in tropical forests with a high heterogeneity of  tree species. Reduced impact logging (RIL) is an ecological variant of selective logging, to reduce harvest damage, stimulate regrowth and maintain biodiversity levels (Putz et al., 2012). As such, the RIL system is a more ecological and sustainable forest management system, which is promoted under SFM schemes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third system is that of forest plantations, such as hardwoodtree plantations in the tropics  and poplar plantations in temperate regions.  Selected  tree species, either endemic or exotic to the area, are planted and managed more intensively – for example, through irrigation and fertilizer use – to maximise production and/or wood quality. After the trees are harvested, new ones are planted, and management is put in place. Forest plantations generally have a high productivity level (Del Lungo et al., 2006). By producing more wood and wood products on less land, plantations may contribute to more sustainable forest management by reducing the pressures on natural forests (Carle and Homgren, 2008; Alkemade et al., 2009). At the same time, the ecological value of biodiversity in many forest plantations is relatively low (Hartman et al., 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=FM&lt;br /&gt;
|AggregatedComponent=Agriculture and land use&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=pressure component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19272</id>
		<title>Forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19272"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T12:42:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Scenario drivers; Agricultural systems; Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Arets et al, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Timber demand; Demand for traditional biomass; Fraction selective cut;Land cover, land use - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid; Fraction cut down; Forest plantation demand; Suitability rules; Harvesting efficiency; FAO deforestation rates;&lt;br /&gt;
|Parameter=Fraction from non-forested land;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=Timber use fraction; Timber harvest fraction - grid; Forest residues; Forest management - grid; Regrowth forest area - grid; Harvested Wood; Degraded forest area; &lt;br /&gt;
|Description==== Global context ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world’s total forest area and other wooded land area of 2010 was estimated at just over 40 and 11 million km2 , respectively (FAO, 2010). People use these forests as resources for a multitude of purposes, such as for timber, fuel, food, water and other forest-related goods and services. Notwithstanding the undisputed market and non-market value of forests, the total global forest area continues to decline, with distinct differences between world regions. Total global deforestation has decreased over the last decade, but still occurs at a significant scale in large parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. At the same time, net forest expansion takes place in other regions, such as in Europe and China. Agricultural expansion is the main pressure that drives deforestation. In addition to the loss of forest area, degradation processes and a decline in the supply of services may occur as a result of the human use of forests. Managing global forest resources in a sustainable way may help to preserve forests, slow down or reverse the degradation process, while conserving their biodiversity and carbon stocks (FAO, 2010). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several types of forest management systems are in use to meet worldwide demand, for timber, paper, fibre board, biofuel and other products. Management practices depend on forest type, conservation policies and regulation, economics, and other –often local– factors. Practices differ with respect to the volume of wood harvested per area, the rotation cycle and the carbon content and state of biodiversity of the forested areas. Harvested wood  is  used for various purposes, such as for timber, pulp, paper, traditional fuel wood and modern forms of bio-energy. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Forestry in the IMAGE 3.0 model ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the importance of forest management for the functioning and state of forests, its modelling has become an integral part of the IMAGE 3.0 model. The model simulates an forest area in 2010 of total about 46 million km2. As such the area is somewhat larger than observed, due to the fact that the model does not include other wooded land (see Carbon Cycle and Natural Vegetation module for details). To manage these forests three types of systems are defined in IMAGE 3.0  as a simplification of the whole range of existing forest management systems (Carle and Holmgren, 2008; Arets et al., 2011). The purpose of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) is to preserve forests and their production capacity and biodiversity for future generations, and to counteract forest degradation processes. In IMAGE, several elements of SFM can be included, subject to policy options,  consisting for example of shifts in the mix of  forest management systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first type of forest management included in IMAGE, is that of clearcutting (or clearfelling). This is a management system by which all trees in an area are cut down, after which regrowth can take place, either naturally or ‘assisted’. It is applied often in temperate regions, where stands are often monocultures of specific endemic species. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second type is that of selective logging, in which only the trees with the highest economic value are felled. This is more common in tropical forests with a high heterogeneity of  tree species. Reduced impact logging (RIL) is an ecological variant of selective logging, to reduce harvest damage, stimulate regrowth and maintain biodiversity levels (Putz et al., 2012). As such, the RIL system is a more ecological and sustainable forest management system, which is promoted under SFM schemes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third system is that of forest plantations, such as hardwoodtree plantations in the tropics  and poplar plantations in temperate regions.  Selected  tree species, either endemic or exotic to the area, are planted and managed more intensively – for example, through irrigation and fertilizer use – to maximise production and/or wood quality. After the trees are harvested, new ones are planted, and management is put in place. Forest plantations generally have a high productivity level (Del Lungo et al., 2006). By producing more wood and wood products on less land, plantations may contribute to more sustainable forest management by reducing the pressures on natural forests (Carle and Homgren, 2008; Alkemade et al., 2009). At the same time, the ecological value of biodiversity in many forest plantations is relatively low (Hartman et al., 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=FM&lt;br /&gt;
|AggregatedComponent=Agriculture and land use&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=pressure component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Degraded_forest_area&amp;diff=19271</id>
		<title>Degraded forest area</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Degraded_forest_area&amp;diff=19271"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T12:41:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: Created page with &amp;quot;{{VariableTemplate |Label=Degraded Forest area (due to additional deforestation) - grid |Description=Forest area that became harvested/logged due to demand for additional defo...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Degraded Forest area (due to additional deforestation) - grid&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Forest area that became harvested/logged due to demand for additional deforestation, i.e. deforested because of causes not related to changes in food demand. The wood from these grid cells is not used to fulfil the timber demand, and the assumption is made that natural vegetation can&#039;t regrow and agricultural activities are not possible (area is degraded). &lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (end-indicator)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Carbon_cycle_and_natural_vegetation&amp;diff=19267</id>
		<title>Carbon cycle and natural vegetation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Carbon_cycle_and_natural_vegetation&amp;diff=19267"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T11:57:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Vegetation, hydrology and agriculture; Atmospheric composition and climate; Agricultural systems; Forest management; Terrestrial biodiversity; Ecosystem goods and services; Land cover and use;&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=HYDE database&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Sitch et al., 2003;&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Van Minnen et al., 2008; Houghton, 2010; Müller et al., 2007; Ballantyne et al., 2012; Van Minnen et al., 2009; Gerten et al., 2004; Bondeau et al., 2007; Klein Goldewijk et al., 1994; Van Minnen et al., 2000;&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Temperature - grid; Precipitation - grid; Nr of wet days - grid; Cloudiness - grid; CO2 concentration; Timber use fraction; Timber harvest fraction - grid; Land cover, land use - grid; Irrigation water supply - grid; Forest management - grid; Harvesting efficiency; &lt;br /&gt;
|Parameter=Soil properties - grid;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=Potential natural vegetation - grid;NEP (net ecosystem production) - grid; Terrestrial CO2 emission - grid; Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid; NPP (net primary production) - grid; Soil respiration - grid&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=The terrestrial biosphere plays an important role in global and regional carbon (C) cycles and, thus, also in the climate system. Large amounts of carbon, between 2000 and 3000 PgC, are stored in the vegetation and soil components. Land conversions, such as deforestation, have considerably contributed to the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide over the past centuries ([[Van Minnen et al., 2009]]; [[Houghton, 2010]]) and are projected to continue to do so in the future ([[Müller et al., 2007]]). At teh same time the terrestrial biosphere currently absorbs about 30% of the emitted CO2 ([[Ballantyne et al., 2012]]), and a number of options exists to maintain  or even enhance this sink; for example, through protecting existing forests and/or establishing new ones ([[Van Minnen et al., 2008]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Processes ===&lt;br /&gt;
The CO2 uptake by and release from  the terrestrial biosphere is determined by a number of processes that are sensitive to environmental conditions, such as climate, atmospheric CO2 concentration and moisture availability. Hence, even if land cover and land use would remain unchanged, the  strength of the current net sink may change, over time, in response to changes in those conditions. Basic processes include photosynthesis, plant and soil respiration, transpiration, carbon allocation and turnover, and disturbances, such as  fires. Photosynthesis is the process where CO2 is taken up from the atmosphere and converted into organic carbon compounds. This conversion of CO2 is called gross primary production ([[HasAcronym::GPP]]). The sequestered carbon is partially needed for plant maintenance and growth (autotrophic or plant respiration), while the remainder (net primary production [[HasAcronym::NPP]]) is  incorporated in new tissues in various parts of plants, forming live biomass carbon pools. The ultimate fate of these plant parts (incl. leaf fall and mortality) cause the stored carbon to be transferred to various carbon pools, such as the soil and the atmosphere. From the soil pools, through processes of soil respiration, CO2 is also emitted back into the atmosphere.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Modelling===&lt;br /&gt;
Terrestrial carbon-cycle and vegetation models contribute to a better understanding of the dynamics of the terrestrial biosphere related to  the underlying processes and their relation to the [[Hydrological cycle]] and [[Agricultural economy and forestry]]. The [[LPJmL model]] ([[Sitch et al., 2003]]; [[Gerten et al., 2004]]; [[Bondeau et al., 2007]]) replaces the earlier IMAGE-2  carbon cycle and vegetation model ([[Klein Goldewijk et al., 1994]]; [[Van Minnen et al., 2000]]). Here, we give a general overview of the LPJmL model in the IMAGE context, with a focus on carbon and vegetation dynamics. For a detailed description of the IMAGE-Natural vegetation and carbon cycle model and a sensitivity analysis, see (Müller et al., 2013&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Müller et al.,b (unpublished)]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=NVCC&lt;br /&gt;
|AggregatedComponent=Vegetation, hydrology and agriculture&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=state component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[HasOutputVar::Terrestrial C balance| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Carbon_cycle_and_natural_vegetation&amp;diff=19263</id>
		<title>Carbon cycle and natural vegetation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Carbon_cycle_and_natural_vegetation&amp;diff=19263"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T11:55:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Vegetation, hydrology and agriculture; Atmospheric composition and climate; Agricultural systems; Forest management; Terrestrial biodiversity; Ecosystem goods and services; Land cover and use;&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=HYDE database&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Sitch et al., 2003;&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=Van Minnen et al., 2008; Houghton, 2010; Müller et al., 2007; Ballantyne et al., 2012; Van Minnen et al., 2009; Gerten et al., 2004; Bondeau et al., 2007; Klein Goldewijk et al., 1994; Van Minnen et al., 2000;&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Temperature - grid; Precipitation - grid; Nr of wet days - grid; Cloudiness - grid; CO2 concentration; Timber use fraction; Timber harvest fraction - grid; Land cover, land use - grid; Irrigation water supply - grid; Forest management - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
|Parameter=Soil properties - grid;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=Potential natural vegetation - grid;NEP (net ecosystem production) - grid; Terrestrial CO2 emission - grid; Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid; NPP (net primary production) - grid; Soil respiration - grid&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=The terrestrial biosphere plays an important role in global and regional carbon (C) cycles and, thus, also in the climate system. Large amounts of carbon, between 2000 and 3000 PgC, are stored in the vegetation and soil components. Land conversions, such as deforestation, have considerably contributed to the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide over the past centuries ([[Van Minnen et al., 2009]]; [[Houghton, 2010]]) and are projected to continue to do so in the future ([[Müller et al., 2007]]). At teh same time the terrestrial biosphere currently absorbs about 30% of the emitted CO2 ([[Ballantyne et al., 2012]]), and a number of options exists to maintain  or even enhance this sink; for example, through protecting existing forests and/or establishing new ones ([[Van Minnen et al., 2008]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Processes ===&lt;br /&gt;
The CO2 uptake by and release from  the terrestrial biosphere is determined by a number of processes that are sensitive to environmental conditions, such as climate, atmospheric CO2 concentration and moisture availability. Hence, even if land cover and land use would remain unchanged, the  strength of the current net sink may change, over time, in response to changes in those conditions. Basic processes include photosynthesis, plant and soil respiration, transpiration, carbon allocation and turnover, and disturbances, such as  fires. Photosynthesis is the process where CO2 is taken up from the atmosphere and converted into organic carbon compounds. This conversion of CO2 is called gross primary production ([[HasAcronym::GPP]]). The sequestered carbon is partially needed for plant maintenance and growth (autotrophic or plant respiration), while the remainder (net primary production [[HasAcronym::NPP]]) is  incorporated in new tissues in various parts of plants, forming live biomass carbon pools. The ultimate fate of these plant parts (incl. leaf fall and mortality) cause the stored carbon to be transferred to various carbon pools, such as the soil and the atmosphere. From the soil pools, through processes of soil respiration, CO2 is also emitted back into the atmosphere.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Modelling===&lt;br /&gt;
Terrestrial carbon-cycle and vegetation models contribute to a better understanding of the dynamics of the terrestrial biosphere related to  the underlying processes and their relation to the [[Hydrological cycle]] and [[Agricultural economy and forestry]]. The [[LPJmL model]] ([[Sitch et al., 2003]]; [[Gerten et al., 2004]]; [[Bondeau et al., 2007]]) replaces the earlier IMAGE-2  carbon cycle and vegetation model ([[Klein Goldewijk et al., 1994]]; [[Van Minnen et al., 2000]]). Here, we give a general overview of the LPJmL model in the IMAGE context, with a focus on carbon and vegetation dynamics. For a detailed description of the IMAGE-Natural vegetation and carbon cycle model and a sensitivity analysis, see (Müller et al., 2013&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Müller et al.,b (unpublished)]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=NVCC&lt;br /&gt;
|AggregatedComponent=Vegetation, hydrology and agriculture&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=state component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[HasOutputVar::Terrestrial C balance| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management_type_-_grid&amp;diff=19259</id>
		<title>Forest management type - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management_type_-_grid&amp;diff=19259"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T11:40:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Forest land use types&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Forest management type, ie. how timber harvest should occur in a grid cell (clear cut, selective logging, wood plantation or additional deforestation)&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (end-indicator)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Regrowth_forest_area_-_grid&amp;diff=19258</id>
		<title>Regrowth forest area - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Regrowth_forest_area_-_grid&amp;diff=19258"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T11:36:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Areas of regrowth forest&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Area of regrowth forest&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, region&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (end-indicator)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_residues&amp;diff=19256</id>
		<title>Forest residues</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_residues&amp;diff=19256"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T11:35:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Forest residues&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Desrcribes the volume of harvest losses (from damaged/dead trees and unusable tree parts) or harvest residues that are left in the forest by purpose because of environmental concerns (e.g. biodiversity and nutrient supply). These losses/residues remains in the forest after harvest, in in principle enter the soil pools. But they could also be used for other/energy purposes &lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (end-indicator)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Harvested_wood&amp;diff=19254</id>
		<title>Harvested wood</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Harvested_wood&amp;diff=19254"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T11:30:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Harvesed Wood - grid&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Desrcribes the volume of wood harvested and removed (seperated for the three different wood pools).&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit=Pg C /yr&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (end-indicator)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Harvest_efficiency&amp;diff=19249</id>
		<title>Harvest efficiency</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Harvest_efficiency&amp;diff=19249"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T11:28:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Forestry drivers&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Regional fraction of harvested timber that is should be taken out of the forest to fulfil the timber demand (per forestry management type).&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=driver&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=Technological change in agriculture and forestry&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=Various sources&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
In principle the fraction is based on literature, applicable for sawlogs &amp;amp; paper/pulp tiber. For biofuel we assume a fraction = 1&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Harvest_efficiency&amp;diff=19248</id>
		<title>Harvest efficiency</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Harvest_efficiency&amp;diff=19248"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T11:27:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Forestry drivers&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Regional fraction of harvested timber that is should be taken out of the forest to fulfil the timber demand (per forestry management type).&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=driver&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=Technological change in agriculture and forestry&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=Various sources&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
In principle the fraction is based onliterature, applicable for sawlogs &amp;amp; paper/pulp tiber. For biofuel we assume a fraction = 1&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Harvest_efficiency&amp;diff=19247</id>
		<title>Harvest efficiency</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Harvest_efficiency&amp;diff=19247"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T11:27:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Forestry drivers&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Regaiona fraction of harvested timber that is should be taken out of the forest to fulfil the timber demand (per forestry management type).&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=driver&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=Technological change in agriculture and forestry&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=Various sources&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|ExternalModel=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
In principle the fraction is based onliterature, applicable for sawlogs &amp;amp; paper/pulp tiber. For biofuel we assume a fraction = 1&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19246</id>
		<title>Forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19246"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T11:24:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Scenario drivers; Agricultural systems; Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Arets et al, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Timber demand; Demand for traditional biomass; Fraction selective cut;Land cover, land use - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid; Fraction cut down; Forest plantation demand; Suitability rules; Harvesting efficiency; FAO deforestation rates;&lt;br /&gt;
|Parameter=Fraction from non-forested land;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=Timber use fraction; Timber harvest fraction - grid; Forest residues; Forest management - grid; Regrowth forest area - grid; Harvested Wood; &lt;br /&gt;
|Description==== Global context ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world’s total forest area and other wooded land area of 2010 was estimated at just over 40 and 11 million km2 , respectively (FAO, 2010). People use these forests as resources for a multitude of purposes, such as for timber, fuel, food, water and other forest-related goods and services. Notwithstanding the undisputed market and non-market value of forests, the total global forest area continues to decline, with distinct differences between world regions. Total global deforestation has decreased over the last decade, but still occurs at a significant scale in large parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. At the same time, net forest expansion takes place in other regions, such as in Europe and China. Agricultural expansion is the main pressure that drives deforestation. In addition to the loss of forest area, degradation processes and a decline in the supply of services may occur as a result of the human use of forests. Managing global forest resources in a sustainable way may help to preserve forests, slow down or reverse the degradation process, while conserving their biodiversity and carbon stocks (FAO, 2010). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several types of forest management systems are in use to meet worldwide demand, for timber, paper, fibre board, biofuel and other products. Management practices depend on forest type, conservation policies and regulation, economics, and other –often local– factors. Practices differ with respect to the volume of wood harvested per area, the rotation cycle and the carbon content and state of biodiversity of the forested areas. Harvested wood  is  used for various purposes, such as for timber, pulp, paper, traditional fuel wood and modern forms of bio-energy. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Forestry in the IMAGE 3.0 model ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the importance of forest management for the functioning and state of forests, its modelling has become an integral part of the IMAGE 3.0 model. The model simulates an forest area in 2010 of total about 46 million km2. As such the area is somewhat larger than observed, due to the fact that the model does not include other wooded land (see Carbon Cycle and Natural Vegetation module for details). To manage these forests three types of systems are defined in IMAGE 3.0  as a simplification of the whole range of existing forest management systems (Carle and Holmgren, 2008; Arets et al., 2011). The purpose of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) is to preserve forests and their production capacity and biodiversity for future generations, and to counteract forest degradation processes. In IMAGE, several elements of SFM can be included, subject to policy options,  consisting for example of shifts in the mix of  forest management systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first type of forest management included in IMAGE, is that of clearcutting (or clearfelling). This is a management system by which all trees in an area are cut down, after which regrowth can take place, either naturally or ‘assisted’. It is applied often in temperate regions, where stands are often monocultures of specific endemic species. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second type is that of selective logging, in which only the trees with the highest economic value are felled. This is more common in tropical forests with a high heterogeneity of  tree species. Reduced impact logging (RIL) is an ecological variant of selective logging, to reduce harvest damage, stimulate regrowth and maintain biodiversity levels (Putz et al., 2012). As such, the RIL system is a more ecological and sustainable forest management system, which is promoted under SFM schemes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third system is that of forest plantations, such as hardwoodtree plantations in the tropics  and poplar plantations in temperate regions.  Selected  tree species, either endemic or exotic to the area, are planted and managed more intensively – for example, through irrigation and fertilizer use – to maximise production and/or wood quality. After the trees are harvested, new ones are planted, and management is put in place. Forest plantations generally have a high productivity level (Del Lungo et al., 2006). By producing more wood and wood products on less land, plantations may contribute to more sustainable forest management by reducing the pressures on natural forests (Carle and Homgren, 2008; Alkemade et al., 2009). At the same time, the ecological value of biodiversity in many forest plantations is relatively low (Hartman et al., 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=FM&lt;br /&gt;
|AggregatedComponent=Agriculture and land use&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=pressure component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Harvested_wood&amp;diff=19245</id>
		<title>Harvested wood</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Harvested_wood&amp;diff=19245"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T11:24:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: Created page with &amp;quot;{{VariableTemplate |Label=Harvesed Wood - grid |Description=Desrcribes the volume of wood harvested and removed (per forestry management type). |Dimension=time, worldgrid |Uni...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Harvesed Wood - grid&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Desrcribes the volume of wood harvested and removed (per forestry management type).&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, worldgrid&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit=Pg C /yr&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (end-indicator)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19238</id>
		<title>Forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19238"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T10:10:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Scenario drivers; Agricultural systems; Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Arets et al, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Timber demand; Demand for traditional biomass; Fraction selective cut;Land cover, land use - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid; Fraction cut down; Forest plantation demand; Suitability rules; Harvesting efficiency; FAO deforestation rates;&lt;br /&gt;
|Parameter=Fraction from non-forested land;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=Timber use fraction; Timber harvest fraction - grid; Forest residues; Forest management - grid; Regrowth forest area - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
|Description==== Global context ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world’s total forest area and other wooded land area of 2010 was estimated at just over 40 and 11 million km2 , respectively (FAO, 2010). People use these forests as resources for a multitude of purposes, such as for timber, fuel, food, water and other forest-related goods and services. Notwithstanding the undisputed market and non-market value of forests, the total global forest area continues to decline, with distinct differences between world regions. Total global deforestation has decreased over the last decade, but still occurs at a significant scale in large parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. At the same time, net forest expansion takes place in other regions, such as in Europe and China. Agricultural expansion is the main pressure that drives deforestation. In addition to the loss of forest area, degradation processes and a decline in the supply of services may occur as a result of the human use of forests. Managing global forest resources in a sustainable way may help to preserve forests, slow down or reverse the degradation process, while conserving their biodiversity and carbon stocks (FAO, 2010). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several types of forest management systems are in use to meet worldwide demand, for timber, paper, fibre board, biofuel and other products. Management practices depend on forest type, conservation policies and regulation, economics, and other –often local– factors. Practices differ with respect to the volume of wood harvested per area, the rotation cycle and the carbon content and state of biodiversity of the forested areas. Harvested wood  is  used for various purposes, such as for timber, pulp, paper, traditional fuel wood and modern forms of bio-energy. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Forestry in the IMAGE 3.0 model ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the importance of forest management for the functioning and state of forests, its modelling has become an integral part of the IMAGE 3.0 model. The model simulates an forest area in 2010 of total about 46 million km2. As such the area is somewhat larger than observed, due to the fact that the model does not include other wooded land (see Carbon Cycle and Natural Vegetation module for details). To manage these forests three types of systems are defined in IMAGE 3.0  as a simplification of the whole range of existing forest management systems (Carle and Holmgren, 2008; Arets et al., 2011). The purpose of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) is to preserve forests and their production capacity and biodiversity for future generations, and to counteract forest degradation processes. In IMAGE, several elements of SFM can be included, subject to policy options,  consisting for example of shifts in the mix of  forest management systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first type of forest management included in IMAGE, is that of clearcutting (or clearfelling). This is a management system by which all trees in an area are cut down, after which regrowth can take place, either naturally or ‘assisted’. It is applied often in temperate regions, where stands are often monocultures of specific endemic species. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second type is that of selective logging, in which only the trees with the highest economic value are felled. This is more common in tropical forests with a high heterogeneity of  tree species. Reduced impact logging (RIL) is an ecological variant of selective logging, to reduce harvest damage, stimulate regrowth and maintain biodiversity levels (Putz et al., 2012). As such, the RIL system is a more ecological and sustainable forest management system, which is promoted under SFM schemes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third system is that of forest plantations, such as hardwoodtree plantations in the tropics  and poplar plantations in temperate regions.  Selected  tree species, either endemic or exotic to the area, are planted and managed more intensively – for example, through irrigation and fertilizer use – to maximise production and/or wood quality. After the trees are harvested, new ones are planted, and management is put in place. Forest plantations generally have a high productivity level (Del Lungo et al., 2006). By producing more wood and wood products on less land, plantations may contribute to more sustainable forest management by reducing the pressures on natural forests (Carle and Homgren, 2008; Alkemade et al., 2009). At the same time, the ecological value of biodiversity in many forest plantations is relatively low (Hartman et al., 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=FM&lt;br /&gt;
|AggregatedComponent=Agriculture and land use&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=pressure component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19233</id>
		<title>Forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19233"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T09:08:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Scenario drivers; Agricultural systems; Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Arets et al, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Timber demand; Demand for traditional biomass; Fraction selective cut;Land cover, land use - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid; Fraction cut down; Forest plantation demand; Suitability rules; Harvesting efficiency; FAO deforestation rates;&lt;br /&gt;
|Parameter=Fraction from non-forested land;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=Timber use fraction; Area Regrowth forest - grid; Area degraded forest -grid; Timber harvest - grid; Forest residues; Forest management - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
|Description==== Global context ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world’s total forest area and other wooded land area of 2010 was estimated at just over 40 and 11 million km2 , respectively (FAO, 2010). People use these forests as resources for a multitude of purposes, such as for timber, fuel, food, water and other forest-related goods and services. Notwithstanding the undisputed market and non-market value of forests, the total global forest area continues to decline, with distinct differences between world regions. Total global deforestation has decreased over the last decade, but still occurs at a significant scale in large parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. At the same time, net forest expansion takes place in other regions, such as in Europe and China. Agricultural expansion is the main pressure that drives deforestation. In addition to the loss of forest area, degradation processes and a decline in the supply of services may occur as a result of the human use of forests. Managing global forest resources in a sustainable way may help to preserve forests, slow down or reverse the degradation process, while conserving their biodiversity and carbon stocks (FAO, 2010). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several types of forest management systems are in use to meet worldwide demand, for timber, paper, fibre board, biofuel and other products. Management practices depend on forest type, conservation policies and regulation, economics, and other –often local– factors. Practices differ with respect to the volume of wood harvested per area, the rotation cycle and the carbon content and state of biodiversity of the forested areas. Harvested wood  is  used for various purposes, such as for timber, pulp, paper, traditional fuel wood and modern forms of bio-energy. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Forestry in the IMAGE 3.0 model ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the importance of forest management for the functioning and state of forests, its modelling has become an integral part of the IMAGE 3.0 model. The model simulates an forest area in 2010 of total about 46 million km2. As such the area is somewhat larger than observed, due to the fact that the model does not include other wooded land (see Carbon Cycle and Natural Vegetation module for details). To manage these forests three types of systems are defined in IMAGE 3.0  as a simplification of the whole range of existing forest management systems (Carle and Holmgren, 2008; Arets et al., 2011). The purpose of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) is to preserve forests and their production capacity and biodiversity for future generations, and to counteract forest degradation processes. In IMAGE, several elements of SFM can be included, subject to policy options,  consisting for example of shifts in the mix of  forest management systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first type of forest management included in IMAGE, is that of clearcutting (or clearfelling). This is a management system by which all trees in an area are cut down, after which regrowth can take place, either naturally or ‘assisted’. It is applied often in temperate regions, where stands are often monocultures of specific endemic species. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second type is that of selective logging, in which only the trees with the highest economic value are felled. This is more common in tropical forests with a high heterogeneity of  tree species. Reduced impact logging (RIL) is an ecological variant of selective logging, to reduce harvest damage, stimulate regrowth and maintain biodiversity levels (Putz et al., 2012). As such, the RIL system is a more ecological and sustainable forest management system, which is promoted under SFM schemes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third system is that of forest plantations, such as hardwoodtree plantations in the tropics  and poplar plantations in temperate regions.  Selected  tree species, either endemic or exotic to the area, are planted and managed more intensively – for example, through irrigation and fertilizer use – to maximise production and/or wood quality. After the trees are harvested, new ones are planted, and management is put in place. Forest plantations generally have a high productivity level (Del Lungo et al., 2006). By producing more wood and wood products on less land, plantations may contribute to more sustainable forest management by reducing the pressures on natural forests (Carle and Homgren, 2008; Alkemade et al., 2009). At the same time, the ecological value of biodiversity in many forest plantations is relatively low (Hartman et al., 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=FM&lt;br /&gt;
|AggregatedComponent=Agriculture and land use&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=pressure component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Land_suitability_-_grid&amp;diff=19232</id>
		<title>Land suitability - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Land_suitability_-_grid&amp;diff=19232"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T09:05:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Suitability rules&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Rules to allocate grid cells that could become harvested to fulfil the timber demand. &lt;br /&gt;
Local conditions like slope &amp;amp; soil characteristics, population, protected areas, land-use characteristics, forest condition (i.e. rotation length ended?)&lt;br /&gt;
Rules are quite similar to the rules for agriculture, accept those used to allocate additional deforestation&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=driver&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=Technological change in agriculture and forestry&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19231</id>
		<title>Forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19231"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T09:02:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Scenario drivers; Agricultural systems; Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Arets et al, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Timber demand; Demand for traditional biomass; Fraction selective cut;Land cover, land use - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid; Fraction cut down; Forest plantation demand; Suitability rules; Harvesting efficiency; FAO deforestation rates; &lt;br /&gt;
|Parameter=Fraction from non-forested land;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=Timber use fraction; Forest residues that remain in forest grid; Forest management type - grid; Area Regrowth forest - grid; Area degraded forest -grid; Timber harvest - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|Description==== Global context ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world’s total forest area and other wooded land area of 2010 was estimated at just over 40 and 11 million km2 , respectively (FAO, 2010). People use these forests as resources for a multitude of purposes, such as for timber, fuel, food, water and other forest-related goods and services. Notwithstanding the undisputed market and non-market value of forests, the total global forest area continues to decline, with distinct differences between world regions. Total global deforestation has decreased over the last decade, but still occurs at a significant scale in large parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. At the same time, net forest expansion takes place in other regions, such as in Europe and China. Agricultural expansion is the main pressure that drives deforestation. In addition to the loss of forest area, degradation processes and a decline in the supply of services may occur as a result of the human use of forests. Managing global forest resources in a sustainable way may help to preserve forests, slow down or reverse the degradation process, while conserving their biodiversity and carbon stocks (FAO, 2010). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several types of forest management systems are in use to meet worldwide demand, for timber, paper, fibre board, biofuel and other products. Management practices depend on forest type, conservation policies and regulation, economics, and other –often local– factors. Practices differ with respect to the volume of wood harvested per area, the rotation cycle and the carbon content and state of biodiversity of the forested areas. Harvested wood  is  used for various purposes, such as for timber, pulp, paper, traditional fuel wood and modern forms of bio-energy. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Forestry in the IMAGE 3.0 model ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the importance of forest management for the functioning and state of forests, its modelling has become an integral part of the IMAGE 3.0 model. The model simulates an forest area in 2010 of total about 46 million km2. As such the area is somewhat larger than observed, due to the fact that the model does not include other wooded land (see Carbon Cycle and Natural Vegetation module for details). To manage these forests three types of systems are defined in IMAGE 3.0  as a simplification of the whole range of existing forest management systems (Carle and Holmgren, 2008; Arets et al., 2011). The purpose of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) is to preserve forests and their production capacity and biodiversity for future generations, and to counteract forest degradation processes. In IMAGE, several elements of SFM can be included, subject to policy options,  consisting for example of shifts in the mix of  forest management systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first type of forest management included in IMAGE, is that of clearcutting (or clearfelling). This is a management system by which all trees in an area are cut down, after which regrowth can take place, either naturally or ‘assisted’. It is applied often in temperate regions, where stands are often monocultures of specific endemic species. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second type is that of selective logging, in which only the trees with the highest economic value are felled. This is more common in tropical forests with a high heterogeneity of  tree species. Reduced impact logging (RIL) is an ecological variant of selective logging, to reduce harvest damage, stimulate regrowth and maintain biodiversity levels (Putz et al., 2012). As such, the RIL system is a more ecological and sustainable forest management system, which is promoted under SFM schemes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third system is that of forest plantations, such as hardwoodtree plantations in the tropics  and poplar plantations in temperate regions.  Selected  tree species, either endemic or exotic to the area, are planted and managed more intensively – for example, through irrigation and fertilizer use – to maximise production and/or wood quality. After the trees are harvested, new ones are planted, and management is put in place. Forest plantations generally have a high productivity level (Del Lungo et al., 2006). By producing more wood and wood products on less land, plantations may contribute to more sustainable forest management by reducing the pressures on natural forests (Carle and Homgren, 2008; Alkemade et al., 2009). At the same time, the ecological value of biodiversity in many forest plantations is relatively low (Hartman et al., 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=FM&lt;br /&gt;
|AggregatedComponent=Agriculture and land use&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=pressure component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=FAO_deforestation_rates&amp;diff=19229</id>
		<title>FAO deforestation rates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=FAO_deforestation_rates&amp;diff=19229"/>
		<updated>2014-03-26T09:00:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: Created page with &amp;quot;{{VariableTemplate |Label=FAO deforestation rates |Description=Historical deforestation rates in the IMAGE 3.0 regions, according to FAO |Dimension=time, region |VariableType=...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=FAO deforestation rates&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Historical deforestation rates in the IMAGE 3.0 regions, according to FAO&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimension=time, region&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=historical data&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=FAOSTAT database; &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19228</id>
		<title>Forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19228"/>
		<updated>2014-03-25T16:48:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Scenario drivers; Agricultural systems; Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Arets et al, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Timber demand; Demand for traditional biomass; Fraction selective cut;Land cover, land use - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid; Fraction cut down; Forest plantation demand; Suitability rules; Harvesting efficiency; &lt;br /&gt;
|Parameter=Fraction from non-forested land;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=Timber use fraction; Forest residues that remain in forest grid; Forest management type - grid; Area Regrowth forest - grid; Area degraded forest -grid; Timber harvest - grid;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description==== Global context ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world’s total forest area and other wooded land area of 2010 was estimated at just over 40 and 11 million km2 , respectively (FAO, 2010). People use these forests as resources for a multitude of purposes, such as for timber, fuel, food, water and other forest-related goods and services. Notwithstanding the undisputed market and non-market value of forests, the total global forest area continues to decline, with distinct differences between world regions. Total global deforestation has decreased over the last decade, but still occurs at a significant scale in large parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. At the same time, net forest expansion takes place in other regions, such as in Europe and China. Agricultural expansion is the main pressure that drives deforestation. In addition to the loss of forest area, degradation processes and a decline in the supply of services may occur as a result of the human use of forests. Managing global forest resources in a sustainable way may help to preserve forests, slow down or reverse the degradation process, while conserving their biodiversity and carbon stocks (FAO, 2010). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several types of forest management systems are in use to meet worldwide demand, for timber, paper, fibre board, biofuel and other products. Management practices depend on forest type, conservation policies and regulation, economics, and other –often local– factors. Practices differ with respect to the volume of wood harvested per area, the rotation cycle and the carbon content and state of biodiversity of the forested areas. Harvested wood  is  used for various purposes, such as for timber, pulp, paper, traditional fuel wood and modern forms of bio-energy. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Forestry in the IMAGE 3.0 model ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the importance of forest management for the functioning and state of forests, its modelling has become an integral part of the IMAGE 3.0 model. The model simulates an forest area in 2010 of total about 46 million km2. As such the area is somewhat larger than observed, due to the fact that the model does not include other wooded land (see Carbon Cycle and Natural Vegetation module for details). To manage these forests three types of systems are defined in IMAGE 3.0  as a simplification of the whole range of existing forest management systems (Carle and Holmgren, 2008; Arets et al., 2011). The purpose of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) is to preserve forests and their production capacity and biodiversity for future generations, and to counteract forest degradation processes. In IMAGE, several elements of SFM can be included, subject to policy options,  consisting for example of shifts in the mix of  forest management systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first type of forest management included in IMAGE, is that of clearcutting (or clearfelling). This is a management system by which all trees in an area are cut down, after which regrowth can take place, either naturally or ‘assisted’. It is applied often in temperate regions, where stands are often monocultures of specific endemic species. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second type is that of selective logging, in which only the trees with the highest economic value are felled. This is more common in tropical forests with a high heterogeneity of  tree species. Reduced impact logging (RIL) is an ecological variant of selective logging, to reduce harvest damage, stimulate regrowth and maintain biodiversity levels (Putz et al., 2012). As such, the RIL system is a more ecological and sustainable forest management system, which is promoted under SFM schemes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third system is that of forest plantations, such as hardwoodtree plantations in the tropics  and poplar plantations in temperate regions.  Selected  tree species, either endemic or exotic to the area, are planted and managed more intensively – for example, through irrigation and fertilizer use – to maximise production and/or wood quality. After the trees are harvested, new ones are planted, and management is put in place. Forest plantations generally have a high productivity level (Del Lungo et al., 2006). By producing more wood and wood products on less land, plantations may contribute to more sustainable forest management by reducing the pressures on natural forests (Carle and Homgren, 2008; Alkemade et al., 2009). At the same time, the ecological value of biodiversity in many forest plantations is relatively low (Hartman et al., 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=FM&lt;br /&gt;
|AggregatedComponent=Agriculture and land use&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=pressure component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19227</id>
		<title>Forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19227"/>
		<updated>2014-03-25T16:46:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Scenario drivers; Agricultural systems; Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Arets et al, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Timber demand; Demand for traditional biomass; Fraction selective cut;Land cover, land use - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid; Fraction cut down; Forest plantation demand; Suitability rules; &lt;br /&gt;
|Parameter=Fraction from non-forested land;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=Timber use fraction; Forest residues that remain in forest grid; Forest management type - grid; Area Regrowth forest - grid; Area degraded forest -grid; Timber harvest - grid;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description==== Global context ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world’s total forest area and other wooded land area of 2010 was estimated at just over 40 and 11 million km2 , respectively (FAO, 2010). People use these forests as resources for a multitude of purposes, such as for timber, fuel, food, water and other forest-related goods and services. Notwithstanding the undisputed market and non-market value of forests, the total global forest area continues to decline, with distinct differences between world regions. Total global deforestation has decreased over the last decade, but still occurs at a significant scale in large parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. At the same time, net forest expansion takes place in other regions, such as in Europe and China. Agricultural expansion is the main pressure that drives deforestation. In addition to the loss of forest area, degradation processes and a decline in the supply of services may occur as a result of the human use of forests. Managing global forest resources in a sustainable way may help to preserve forests, slow down or reverse the degradation process, while conserving their biodiversity and carbon stocks (FAO, 2010). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several types of forest management systems are in use to meet worldwide demand, for timber, paper, fibre board, biofuel and other products. Management practices depend on forest type, conservation policies and regulation, economics, and other –often local– factors. Practices differ with respect to the volume of wood harvested per area, the rotation cycle and the carbon content and state of biodiversity of the forested areas. Harvested wood  is  used for various purposes, such as for timber, pulp, paper, traditional fuel wood and modern forms of bio-energy. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Forestry in the IMAGE 3.0 model ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the importance of forest management for the functioning and state of forests, its modelling has become an integral part of the IMAGE 3.0 model. The model simulates an forest area in 2010 of total about 46 million km2. As such the area is somewhat larger than observed, due to the fact that the model does not include other wooded land (see Carbon Cycle and Natural Vegetation module for details). To manage these forests three types of systems are defined in IMAGE 3.0  as a simplification of the whole range of existing forest management systems (Carle and Holmgren, 2008; Arets et al., 2011). The purpose of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) is to preserve forests and their production capacity and biodiversity for future generations, and to counteract forest degradation processes. In IMAGE, several elements of SFM can be included, subject to policy options,  consisting for example of shifts in the mix of  forest management systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first type of forest management included in IMAGE, is that of clearcutting (or clearfelling). This is a management system by which all trees in an area are cut down, after which regrowth can take place, either naturally or ‘assisted’. It is applied often in temperate regions, where stands are often monocultures of specific endemic species. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second type is that of selective logging, in which only the trees with the highest economic value are felled. This is more common in tropical forests with a high heterogeneity of  tree species. Reduced impact logging (RIL) is an ecological variant of selective logging, to reduce harvest damage, stimulate regrowth and maintain biodiversity levels (Putz et al., 2012). As such, the RIL system is a more ecological and sustainable forest management system, which is promoted under SFM schemes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third system is that of forest plantations, such as hardwoodtree plantations in the tropics  and poplar plantations in temperate regions.  Selected  tree species, either endemic or exotic to the area, are planted and managed more intensively – for example, through irrigation and fertilizer use – to maximise production and/or wood quality. After the trees are harvested, new ones are planted, and management is put in place. Forest plantations generally have a high productivity level (Del Lungo et al., 2006). By producing more wood and wood products on less land, plantations may contribute to more sustainable forest management by reducing the pressures on natural forests (Carle and Homgren, 2008; Alkemade et al., 2009). At the same time, the ecological value of biodiversity in many forest plantations is relatively low (Hartman et al., 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=FM&lt;br /&gt;
|AggregatedComponent=Agriculture and land use&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=pressure component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Land_suitability_-_grid&amp;diff=19226</id>
		<title>Land suitability - grid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Land_suitability_-_grid&amp;diff=19226"/>
		<updated>2014-03-25T16:45:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: Created page with &amp;quot;{{VariableTemplate |Label=Suitability rules |Description=Rules to allocate grid cells that could become harvested to fulfil the timber demand.   Local conditions like slope &amp;amp; ...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{VariableTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Label=Suitability rules&lt;br /&gt;
|Description=Rules to allocate grid cells that could become harvested to fulfil the timber demand. &lt;br /&gt;
Local conditions like slope &amp;amp; soil characteristics, population, protected areas, land-use characteristics, forest condition (i.e. rotation length ended?)&lt;br /&gt;
Rules are quite similar to the rules for agriculture, accept those used to allocate additional deforestation&lt;br /&gt;
|VariableType=model (from/to model)&lt;br /&gt;
|Source2=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn2=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
|DriverGroup=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source=&lt;br /&gt;
|BasedOn=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference=&lt;br /&gt;
|Source3=&lt;br /&gt;
|Reference2=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19225</id>
		<title>Forest management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://models.pbl.nl/index.php?title=Forest_management&amp;diff=19225"/>
		<updated>2014-03-25T16:27:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JellevanMinnen: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ComponentTemplate2&lt;br /&gt;
|IMAGEComponent=Scenario drivers; Agricultural systems; Natural vegetation and carbon cycle&lt;br /&gt;
|KeyReference=Arets et al, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|InputVar=Timber demand; Demand for traditional biomass; Fraction of traditional biomass coming from non-forested land; Fraction selective cut;; Harvest efficiency; Suitability; Land cover, land use - grid; &lt;br /&gt;
FAO deforestation rates; Carbon pools in vegetation, soil and timber - grid; Fraction cut down; Forest plantation demand; &lt;br /&gt;
|Parameter=Fraction from non-forested land;&lt;br /&gt;
|OutputVar=Timber use fraction; Forest residues that remain in forest grid; Forest management type - grid; Area Regrowth forest - grid; Area degraded forest -grid; Timber harvest - grid;&lt;br /&gt;
|Description==== Global context ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world’s total forest area and other wooded land area of 2010 was estimated at just over 40 and 11 million km2 , respectively (FAO, 2010). People use these forests as resources for a multitude of purposes, such as for timber, fuel, food, water and other forest-related goods and services. Notwithstanding the undisputed market and non-market value of forests, the total global forest area continues to decline, with distinct differences between world regions. Total global deforestation has decreased over the last decade, but still occurs at a significant scale in large parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. At the same time, net forest expansion takes place in other regions, such as in Europe and China. Agricultural expansion is the main pressure that drives deforestation. In addition to the loss of forest area, degradation processes and a decline in the supply of services may occur as a result of the human use of forests. Managing global forest resources in a sustainable way may help to preserve forests, slow down or reverse the degradation process, while conserving their biodiversity and carbon stocks (FAO, 2010). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several types of forest management systems are in use to meet worldwide demand, for timber, paper, fibre board, biofuel and other products. Management practices depend on forest type, conservation policies and regulation, economics, and other –often local– factors. Practices differ with respect to the volume of wood harvested per area, the rotation cycle and the carbon content and state of biodiversity of the forested areas. Harvested wood  is  used for various purposes, such as for timber, pulp, paper, traditional fuel wood and modern forms of bio-energy. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Forestry in the IMAGE 3.0 model ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the importance of forest management for the functioning and state of forests, its modelling has become an integral part of the IMAGE 3.0 model. The model simulates an forest area in 2010 of total about 46 million km2. As such the area is somewhat larger than observed, due to the fact that the model does not include other wooded land (see Carbon Cycle and Natural Vegetation module for details). To manage these forests three types of systems are defined in IMAGE 3.0  as a simplification of the whole range of existing forest management systems (Carle and Holmgren, 2008; Arets et al., 2011). The purpose of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) is to preserve forests and their production capacity and biodiversity for future generations, and to counteract forest degradation processes. In IMAGE, several elements of SFM can be included, subject to policy options,  consisting for example of shifts in the mix of  forest management systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first type of forest management included in IMAGE, is that of clearcutting (or clearfelling). This is a management system by which all trees in an area are cut down, after which regrowth can take place, either naturally or ‘assisted’. It is applied often in temperate regions, where stands are often monocultures of specific endemic species. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second type is that of selective logging, in which only the trees with the highest economic value are felled. This is more common in tropical forests with a high heterogeneity of  tree species. Reduced impact logging (RIL) is an ecological variant of selective logging, to reduce harvest damage, stimulate regrowth and maintain biodiversity levels (Putz et al., 2012). As such, the RIL system is a more ecological and sustainable forest management system, which is promoted under SFM schemes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third system is that of forest plantations, such as hardwoodtree plantations in the tropics  and poplar plantations in temperate regions.  Selected  tree species, either endemic or exotic to the area, are planted and managed more intensively – for example, through irrigation and fertilizer use – to maximise production and/or wood quality. After the trees are harvested, new ones are planted, and management is put in place. Forest plantations generally have a high productivity level (Del Lungo et al., 2006). By producing more wood and wood products on less land, plantations may contribute to more sustainable forest management by reducing the pressures on natural forests (Carle and Homgren, 2008; Alkemade et al., 2009). At the same time, the ecological value of biodiversity in many forest plantations is relatively low (Hartman et al., 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
|ComponentCode=FM&lt;br /&gt;
|AggregatedComponent=Agriculture and land use&lt;br /&gt;
|FrameworkElementType=pressure component&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JellevanMinnen</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>