Climate policy/Policy issues: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:55, 6 November 2016

Parts of Climate policy/Policy issues

Component is implemented in:

Components:

Related IMAGE components

Models/Databases

Key publications

References

Flowchart Climate policy. See also the Input/Output Table on the introduction page.

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 As shown in the figure below, all reductions result from reduced emissions from deforestation (REDD). The contributions from {{abbrTemplate|REDD}} projects (about 560 MtCO2) are expected to exceed or match the required total reduction in all greenhouse gas emissions of 470 and 570 Mt CO2eq for the 36% and 39% reduction pledge scenarios.
-|Example=The Global Pathfinder module was used to determine what the pledges for 2020 imply for global emission pathways consistent with meeting the 2 °C target ([[Van Vliet et al., 2012]]). The main findings were as follows (see also the figure below):
+|Example=
+<div class=“version changev31”>
+The Global Pathfinder module FAIR-SiMCaP was used to determine what the pledges for 2020 imply for global emission pathways consistent with meeting the 2 °C target ([[Van Vliet et al., 2012]]). The main findings were as follows (see also the figure below):
+</div>
 * The global 2020 emission level resulting from implementation of the Copenhagen Accord pledges exceeds those of least-cost pathways that achieve a 2 °C target;
 * Slightly postponing mitigation action (potential Copenhagen scenario) compared to the least-cost scenario seems technically feasible but at higher cumulative discounted mitigation costs;