|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{ComponentDescriptionTemplate
| + | <div class="page_standard">__NOEDITSECTION__ __NOTOC__ |
| − | |Reference=Hoogwijk, 2004; Van Vuuren, 2007; Hendriks et al., 2004b; Van Ruijven et al., 2007; Ueckerdt et al., 2016; Gernaat et al., 2014; Koberle et al., 2015; De Boer and Van Vuuren, under review;
| + | This page summarises relevant additions and changes to the IMAGE website |
| − | |Description=[[TIMER model|TIMER]] includes two main energy conversion modules: Electric power generation and hydrogen generation. Below, electric power generation is described in detail. In addition, the key characteristics of the hydrogen generation model, which follows a similar structure, are presented.
| |
| | | | |
| − | ===Electric power generation=== | + | ==September 2015== |
| − | <div class="version newv31">
| + | Extra IMAGE framework page linking to the Advisory Board (2014) report and IMAGE strategy document |
| − | In TIMER, electricity can be generated by 28 technologies. These include the VRE sources solar photovoltaics (PV), concentrated solar power (CSP), and onshore and offshore wind power. Other technology types are natural gas-, coal-, biomass- and oil-fired power plants. These power plants come in multiple variations: conventional, combined cycle, carbon capture and storage (CCS) and combined heat and power (CHP). The electricity sector in TIMER also describes the use of nuclear, other renewables (mainly geothermal power) and hydroelectric power. ([[De Boer and Van Vuuren, under review]])
| + | |
| − | </div>
| + | ☛ [[IMAGE framework/Development for the 2015-2020 period]] |
| | + | |
| | + | Update of application ADVANCE |
| | + | |
| | + | ☛ [[ADVANCE project]] |
| | + | |
| | + | Copied IMAGE reference card from the ADVANCE site |
| | + | |
| | + | ☛ [[Reference card]] |
| | + | |
| | + | Additional pages for component Energy demand and supply |
| | + | |
| | + | ☛ [[Grid and infrastructure]] |
| | + | ☛ [[Carbon capture and storage]] |
| | | | |
| − | <div class="version changev31">
| + | ==May 2018== |
| − | As shown in the flowchart, two key elements of the electric power generation are the investment strategy and the operational strategy in the sector. A challenge in simulating electricity production in an aggregated model is that in reality electricity production depends on a range of complex factors, related to costs, reliance, and the time required to switch on technologies. Modelling these factors requires a high level of detail and thus IAMs, such as TIMER, concentrate on introducing a set of simplified, meta relationships ([[Hoogwijk, 2004]]; [[Van Vuuren, 2007]]; [[De Boer and Van Vuuren, under review]]).
| + | All changes made to the core models (IMAGE 3.0.1) in order to create the SSP scenarios |
| − | </div>
| |
| | | | |
| − | ====Total demand for new capacity====
| + | Added version and model changes info |
| − | <div class="version changev31">
| |
| − | The electricity generation capacity required to meet the demand per region is based on a forecast of the maximum annual electricity demand plus a reserve margin. The reserve margin consists of a general reserve margin of 10-20% plus a compensation for imperfect capacity credits (the ability of capacity to supply peak load) of existing capacity. The maximum annual demand is calculated on the basis of an assumed shape of the load duration curve (LDC) and the gross electricity demand. The latter comprises the net electricity demand from the end-use sectors plus electricity trade and transmission losses. An LDC shows the distribution of load over a certain timespan in a downward form. The peak load is plotted to the left of the LDC and the lowest load is plotted to the right. The shape of the LDC is based on work by Ueckerdt et al. ([[Ueckerdt et al., 2016|2016]]), who derived regional normalized residual LDCs (RLDC) for different solar and wind shares, including the application of optimized electricity storage.
| |
| | | | |
| − | The final demand for new generation capacity is equal to the difference between the required and existing capacity. Power plants are assumed to be replaced at the end of their lifetime, which varies from 25 to 80 years, depending on the technology.
| + | ☛ [[IMAGE_framework_version_overview]] |
| − | </div>
| |
| | | | |
| − | ====Decisions to invest in specific options ====
| + | Added articles related to IMAGE framework and projects |
| − | <div class="version changev31">
| |
| − | In the model, the decision to invest in generation technologies is based on the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE; in USD/kWhe) produced per technology, using a multinomial logit equation that assigns larger market shares to the lower cost options.
| |
| | | | |
| − | An important variable used in determining the LCOE is the amount of electricity generated. Often, the LCOEs of technologies are compared at maximum full load hours. However, only a limited share of the installed capacity will actually generate electricity at full load. This effect is captured in a heuristic: 20 different load bands have been introduced to link the investment decision to expected dispatch. The different load bands are distributed among the LDC, resulting in a load factor for each load band. The inclusion of different load factors for each load band means that less capital-intensive technologies are attractive to use for lower load factor load bands. These are likely to be gas-fired peaker plants. For load bands with higher load factors, the electricity submodule chooses technologies with lower operational costs. These are likely to be base load plants, such as coal-fired or nuclear power plants. A system with more VRE sources will result in lower load factors and therefore in a higher demand for peak or mid load technologies.
| + | ☛ [[IMAGE_related_publications_overview]] |
| | | | |
| − | The standard costs of each option can be broken down into several categories: investment or capital cost; fuel cost; fixed and variable operational and maintenance costs; construction costs; and carbon capture and storage costs.
| + | Added download package SSP project |
| − | * The capital costs of VRE and nuclear power develop as a result of endogenous learning mechanisms explained [[Energy supply and demand/Technical learning|here]]. The capital cost development of other technologies is exogenously determined.
| |
| − | * Fuel cost result from the supply modules described [[Energy supply|here]].
| |
| − | * Fixed and variable operation and maintenance costs are exogenously prescribed.
| |
| − | * Construction costs result from interest paid during construction. Construction times vary among the technologies.
| |
| − | * More information on carbon capture and storage cost can be found [[Carbon capture and storage|here]].
| |
| − | Also, additional costs are distinguished: backup costs; curtailment costs; VRE load factor decline; storage costs; and transmission and distribution costs.
| |
| − | * Backup costs have been added to represent the additional costs required in order to meet the capacity and energy production requirements of a load band. Backup costs are higher for technologies with low capacity credits. Backup costs include all standard cost components for the chosen backup technology.
| |
| − | * Curtailment costs are only relevant for VRE technologies and CHP. Curtailments occur when the supply exceeds the demand. The degree to which curtailment occurs depends on VRE share, storage use and the regional correlation between electricity demand and VRE or CHP supply. Curtailment influences the LCOE by reducing the potential amount of electricity that could be generated.
| |
| − | * Load factor reduction results from the utilisation of VRE sites with less favourable environmental conditions, such as lower wind speeds or less solar irradiation. This results in a lower potential load influencing the LCOE by reducing the potential electricity generation. The development of load factor reduction is captured in cost supply curves. For more information on the TIMER cost supply curves see: Hoogwijk ([[Hoogwijk, 2004|2004]]), Gernaat et al., ([[Gernaat et al., 2014|2014]]) and Koberle et al., ([[Koberle et al., 2015|2015]]).
| |
| − | * Storage use has been optimised in the RLDC data set. For more information on storage use, see Ueckerdt et al. (n.d.).
| |
| − | * Transmission and distribution costs are simulated by adding a fixed relationship between the amount of capacity and the required amount of transmission and distribution capital. VRE cost supply curves contain additional transmission costs resulting from distance between VRE potential and demand centres.
| |
| | | | |
| − | The exceptions are hydropower, other renewables and CHP. Hydropower and other renewables are exogenously prescribed, because of a lack of available data or because technologies like large hydropower plants often have additional functions such as water supply and flood control. The demand for CHP capacity is heat demand driven.
| + | ☛ [[Download packages]] |
| | | | |
| − | Finally, in the equations, some constraints are added to account for limitations in supply, for example restrictions on biomass availability. For a more detailed description on electricity sector investments in TIMER, see De Boer & van Vuuren ([[De Boer and Van Vuuren, under review|under review]]).
| |
| − | </div>
| |
| | | | |
| − | ====Operational strategy====
| + | The reference card for IMAGE is now included in the IAMC model documentation site |
| − | <div class="version newv31">
| |
| − | The demand for electricity is met by the installed capacity of power plants. The available capacity is used according to the merit order of the different types of plants; technologies with the lowest variable costs are dispatched first, followed by other technologies based on an ascending order of variable costs. This results in a cost-optimal dispatch of technologies. The dispatch of VRE is described by the RLDC dataset. CHP dispatch is distributed based on monthly heating degree days. Within each month, the CHP load stays constant. | |
| − | </div>
| |
| | | | |
| − | ===Hydrogen generation===
| + | ☛ [[iamcdocumentation.eu\IMAGE]] |
| − | The structure of the hydrogen generation submodule is similar to that for electric power generation ([[Van Ruijven et al., 2007]]) but with following differences:
| |
| − | #There are only eleven supply options for hydrogen production:
| |
| − | #* coal, oil, natural gas and bioenergy, with and without carbon capture and storage (8 plants); | |
| − | #* hydrogen production from electrolysis, direct hydrogen production from solar thermal processes;
| |
| − | #* small methane reform plants.
| |
| − | #No description of preferences for different power plants is taken into account in the operational strategy. The load factor for each option equals the total production divided by the capacity for each region.
| |
| − | #Intermittence does not play an important role because hydrogen can be stored to some degree. Thus, there are no equations simulating system integration.
| |
| − | #Hydrogen can be traded. A trade model is added, similar to those for fossil fuels described in [[Energy supply]].
| |
| | | | |
| − | See the additional info on [[Grid and infrastructure]].
| + | </div> |
| − | }}
| |
