IMAGE framework summary/Description: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
''As far as global hunger is concerned, the Rio+20 scenario shows some clear improvement, in contrast to the last few decades. This improvement is a consequence of a rapid income growth in low-income regions and leveling-off of population growth.'' | ''As far as global hunger is concerned, the Rio+20 scenario shows some clear improvement, in contrast to the last few decades. This improvement is a consequence of a rapid income growth in low-income regions and leveling-off of population growth.'' | ||
{{FormulaTemplate|Figure6_IF}} | {{FormulaTemplate|Figure6_IF}} | ||
[[File:017x img13.png|thumb|400px|left|alt=Human development indicators in baseline scenario|Human development indicators]] | |||
====Other impacts==== | ====Other impacts==== | ||
Other impacts calculated by the IMAGE framework are not described here, including flood risks ([[Flood risks]]), land degradation ([[Soil degradation]]) and ecological goods and services ([[Ecosystem goods and services]]). | Other impacts calculated by the IMAGE framework are not described here, including flood risks ([[Flood risks]]), land degradation ([[Soil degradation]]) and ecological goods and services ([[Ecosystem goods and services]]). | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:16, 12 December 2013
| Projects/Applications |
| Relevant overviews |
| Key publications |