Energy demand - Cement: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{ExpertpageTemplate |parent=Energy demand - Industry |label=Cement |description=Energy demand from the cement sector }}") |
m (Typo) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|label=Cement | |label=Cement | ||
|description=Energy demand from the cement sector | |description=Energy demand from the cement sector | ||
|publication=van Ruijven et al., 2016 | |||
}} | }} | ||
= Clinker and Cement sector = | |||
== Overall Layout == | |||
=== Value chain representation === | |||
Available value chain elements represented in the IMAGE model: | |||
{| class="expertTable" style="text-align: center" | |||
|'''Elements''' | |||
|'''Presence''' | |||
|'''Elaboration''' | |||
|- | |||
| style="vertical-align:middle;" | Material extraction || - || - | |||
|- | |||
| style="vertical-align:middle;" | Material demand ||style="vertical-align:middle;"| x || style="text-align:left;" | Logistic growth model plotted to historical per capita steel consumption data and per capita GDP (van Ruijven et al., 2016) | |||
|- | |||
| style="vertical-align:middle;"| Production routes ||style="vertical-align:middle;"| x || style="text-align:left;" | | |||
Primary (Clinker to cement) (van Ruijven et al., 2016) | |||
|- | |||
| style="vertical-align:middle;"|Technology choice||style="vertical-align:middle;"| x || style="text-align:left;" | | |||
Market share decided on multinomial logit formulation, choosing on relative production costs per region (van Ruijven et al., 2016) | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align:middle;"|Trade ||style="vertical-align:middle;"| x || style="text-align:left;" | | |||
Trade is calculated based on the average regional production cost (e.g. production costs, transport cost and trade barriers) (van Ruijven et al., 2016) | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align:middle;"|End use representation ||style="vertical-align:middle;"| - || - | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align:middle;"|End-of-life representation ||style="vertical-align:middle;"| - || - | |||
|} | |||
=== Historical representation === | |||
Available capital stock present at the start of the simulation: | |||
{| class="wikitable " | |||
|'''Fossil based capacity''' | |||
| | |||
*Standard dry feed rotary kiln | |||
|} | |||
== Dynamic options for systems change == | |||
The following capital stock alternatives are at the disposal of the IMAGE model. Options are chosen on a least-cost base. Relative price differences are created through differences and changes in CAPEX, OPEX, carbon storage costs and policy costs over the time horizon of the model. | |||
{| class="wikitable " | |||
|'''Class''' | |||
|'''Option''' | |||
|- | |||
|Energy innovations || | |||
*Efficient dry feed rotary kiln | |||
*Fuel Switching | |||
|- | |||
|CC(U)S || | |||
*Efficient dry feed rotary kiln + on-site CCS | |||
*Efficient dry feed rotary kiln + oxy-combustion CCS | |||
|- | |||
|Material innovations || | |||
|- | |||
|Process innovations || | |||
|} | |||
== Additional imposable options for systems change == | |||
The following options for systems change can be imposed onto the model. Not included in a standard IMAGE model scenario run. | |||
{| class="wikitable " | |||
|'''Class''' | |||
|'''Option''' | |||
|- | |||
|Energy innovations || | |||
|- | |||
|CC(U)S || | |||
|- | |||
|Material innovation || | |||
*Feedstock substitution | |||
*Material demand reduction | |||
|- | |||
|Process innovations || | |||
|} | |||
[[Category:Energy demand (Expert)]] | |||
[[Category:Expert]] | |||
[[Category:Industry (Expert)]] |
Latest revision as of 15:49, 1 November 2022
Clinker and Cement sector
Overall Layout
Value chain representation
Available value chain elements represented in the IMAGE model:
Elements | Presence | Elaboration |
Material extraction | - | - |
Material demand | x | Logistic growth model plotted to historical per capita steel consumption data and per capita GDP (van Ruijven et al., 2016) |
Production routes | x |
Primary (Clinker to cement) (van Ruijven et al., 2016) |
Technology choice | x |
Market share decided on multinomial logit formulation, choosing on relative production costs per region (van Ruijven et al., 2016) |
Trade | x |
Trade is calculated based on the average regional production cost (e.g. production costs, transport cost and trade barriers) (van Ruijven et al., 2016) |
End use representation | - | - |
End-of-life representation | - | - |
Historical representation
Available capital stock present at the start of the simulation:
Fossil based capacity |
|
Dynamic options for systems change
The following capital stock alternatives are at the disposal of the IMAGE model. Options are chosen on a least-cost base. Relative price differences are created through differences and changes in CAPEX, OPEX, carbon storage costs and policy costs over the time horizon of the model.
Class | Option |
Energy innovations |
|
CC(U)S |
|
Material innovations | |
Process innovations |
Additional imposable options for systems change
The following options for systems change can be imposed onto the model. Not included in a standard IMAGE model scenario run.
Class | Option |
Energy innovations | |
CC(U)S | |
Material innovation |
|
Process innovations |