Harmsen et al., 2015: Difference between revisions

From IMAGE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replacement - "}} {{ ReferenceTemplate " to "")
 
Line 6: Line 6:
|Issue=4
|Issue=4
|Pages2=565-582
|Pages2=565-582
}}
{{ ReferenceTemplate
|Author=M. J. H. M. Harmsen;D. P. van Vuuren;M. van den Berg;A. F. Hof;C. Hope;V. Krey;J. F. Lamarque;A. Marcucci;D. T. Shindell;M. Schaeffer
|Author=M. J. H. M. Harmsen;D. P. van Vuuren;M. van den Berg;A. F. Hof;C. Hope;V. Krey;J. F. Lamarque;A. Marcucci;D. T. Shindell;M. Schaeffer
|Year=2015
|Year=2015
|Journal=Climatic Change
|Journal=Climatic Change
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 08:55, 13 June 2017

Publication type: Journal article
Title: How well do integrated assessment models represent non-CO2 radiative forcing?
Authors: M. J. H. M. Harmsen, D. P. van Vuuren, M. van den Berg, A. F. Hof, C. Hope, V. Krey, J. F. Lamarque, A. Marcucci, D. T. Shindell, M. Schaeffer
Year: 2015
Journal: Climatic Change
Volume: 133
Issue: 4
Pages: 565-582
DOI or URL: 10.1007/s10584-015-1485-0
Citation: M. J. H. M. Harmsen, D. P. van Vuuren, M. van den Berg, A. F. Hof, C. Hope, V. Krey, J. F. Lamarque, A. Marcucci, D. T. Shindell, M. Schaeffer (2015). How well do integrated assessment models represent non-CO2 radiative forcing?. Climatic Change, 133(4), pp. 565-582, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1485-0.


For an overview of all references see All references table overview or All references overview (citation format)