Emission trading policy: Difference between revisions

From IMAGE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{PolicyInterventionTemplate
{{PolicyInterventionTemplate
|Component=Climate policy
|Component=Climate policy
|Description=Analysis of regional abatement costs and emission trading. What contribution has trade in regional abatement (costs)?
|Description=Analysis of the effect of rules for trading emission credits on regional abatement costs.
|Reference=Den Elzen et al., 2008; Den Elzen et al., 2011a; Mendoza Beltrán et al., 2011;
|Reference=Den Elzen et al., 2008; Den Elzen et al., 2011a; Mendoza Beltrán et al., 2011;
}}
}}
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate
{{PolicyInterventionEffectTemplate
|EffectOnComponent=Climate policy
|EffectOnComponent=Climate policy
|EffectDescription=Different rules for trading emission credits lead to different regional mitigation costs. Without any restrictions on emission trading, emission reductions take place wherever it is cheapest to do so and the differences between regional targets and actual domestic emissions is traded among regions. 
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 2 April 2014

Description: Analysis of the effect of rules for trading emission credits on regional abatement costs.
Reference: Den Elzen et al., 2008; Den Elzen et al., 2011a; Mendoza Beltrán et al., 2011;
Is implemented in: Climate policy


Effects of this policy intervention on components

Component: Climate policy
Effect : Different rules for trading emission credits lead to different regional mitigation costs. Without any restrictions on emission trading, emission reductions take place wherever it is cheapest to do so and the differences between regional targets and actual domestic emissions is traded among regions.