Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• Rao et al., 2016  + (A multi-model assessment of the co-benefits of climate mitigation for global air quality)
• Verburg et al., 2008  + (A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use)
• Ackah et al., 2009  + (A new dataset on global income distribution)
• Kok et al., 2016  + (A new method for analysing socio-ecological patterns of vulnerability)
• Huang et al., 2004  + (A new representation of agricultural production technology in GTAP)
• Van Vuuren et al., 2014  + (A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: Scenario matrix architecture)
• Kriegler et al., 2014a  + (A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared climate policy assumptions)
• O'Neill et al., 2014  + (A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways)
• Ebi et al., 2014a  + (A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions)
• Ebi et al., 2014b  + (A new toolkit for developing scenarios for climate change research and policy analysis)
• Bijl et al., 2017  + (A physically-based model of long-term food demand)
• Van Vuuren et al., 2012  + (A proposal for a new scenario framework to support research and assessment in different climate research communities)
• Kim et al., 2018  + (A protocol for an intercomparison of biodiversity and ecosystem services models using harmonized land-use and climate scenarios)
• Hof et al., 2010b  + (A quantitative minimax regret approach to climate change: Does discounting still matter?)
• Van Sluisveld et al., 2021  + (A race to zero - Assessing the position of heavy industry in a global net-zero CO2 emissions context)
• Azar and Dowlatabadi, 1999  + (A review of technical change in assessment of climate policy)
• Koelbl et al., 2013  + (A sensitivity analysis of the global deployment of CCS to the cost of storage and storage capacity estimates)
• Kriegler et al., 2015c  + (A short note on integrated assessment modeling approaches: Rejoinder to the review of "Making or breaking climate targets - The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy")
• Van Vuuren et al., 2017c  + (A special issue on model-based long-term transport scenarios: Model comparison and new methodological developments to improve energy and climate policy analysis)
• Van Vuuren et al., 2011d  + (A special issue on the RCPs)
• Den Elzen et al., 2014  + (A staged sectoral approach for climate mitigation)
• Armington, 1969  + (A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production.)
• Dermody et al., 2014  + (A virtual water network of the Roman world)
• Batjes, 1997  + (A world data set of derived soil properties by FAO-UNESCO soil unit for global modelling)
• De Bruin et al., 2009  + (AD-DICE: An implementation of adaptation in the DICE model)

• ADVANCE publications  + (ADVANCE publications)

• IPCC-DDC, 2007  + (AR4 GCM data: SRES scenarios)
• Den Elzen et al., 2005b  + (Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes)
• Pastor et al., 2014  + (Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments)
• Cofala et al., 2002  + (Acidification, eutrophication and tropospheric ozone impacts for five scenarios of greenhouse gases abatement in Europe)
• Patt et al., 2010  + (Adaptation in integrated assessment modeling: Where do we stand?)
• Doelman et al., 2020  + (Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs)
• Doelman et al., 2019  + (Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs)
• Rost et al., 2008  + (Agricultural green and blue water consumption and its influence on the global water system)
• Frank et al., 2018  + (Agricultural non-CO2 emission reduction potential in the context of the 1.5 °C target.)
• Frank et al., 2019  + (Agricultural non-CO₂ emission reduction potential in the context of the 1.5 °C target)
• Bouwman, 1991  + (Agronomic aspects of wetland rice cultivation and associated methane emissions)
• CBD, 2013  + (Aichi biodiversity targets)
• Fischer et al., 2004  + (Air pollution related deaths during the 2003 heat wave in the Netherlands)
• Krabbe et al., 2015  + (Aligning corporate greenhouse-gas emissions targets with climate goals)
• De Cian et al., 2016  + (Alleviating inequality in climate policy costs: An integrated perspective on mitigation, damage and adaptation)
• Den Elzen et al., 1992a  + (Allocating constrained global carbon budgets: Inter-regional and inter-generational equity for a sustainable world)
• Van Vuuren et al., 2018  + (Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °c target reduce the need for negative emission technologies)
• Pandey et al., 2006  + (Ambient particulate matter concentrations in residential and pollution hotspot areas of world cities: New estimates based on the global model of ambient particulates (GMAPS))
• Aguiar et al., 2016  + (An Overview of the GTAP 9 Data Base)
• Vuong et al., 2006  + (An advantage for detecting dynamic targets in natural scenes)
• Egoh et al., 2012  + (An african account of ecosystem service provision: Use, threats and policy options for sustainable livelihoods)
• Rogner, 1997  + (An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources)
• Dockery et al., 1993  + (An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities)
• De Haan et al., 1994  + (An atmosphere-ocean model for integrated assessment of global change)
• Van Vuuren et al., 2012d  + (An energy vision: The transformation towards sustainability-interconnected challenges and solutions)