Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• Carson, 2010  + (The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Seeking Empirical Regularity and Theoretical Structure)
• Van Egmond et al., 2002  + (The European nitrogen case)
• Den Elzen and Lucas, 2005  + (The FAIR model: A tool to analyse environmental and costs implications of regimes of future commitments)
• IEA, 2019  + (The Future of Hydrogen)
• UNEP/RIVM, 2004  + (The GEO-3 scenarios 2002-2032: Quantification and analysis of environmental impacts)
• Kallio et al., 2004  + (The Global Forest Sector Model EFI-GTM - the model structure)
• Hastings and Dunbar, 1999  + (The Global Land One-kilometer Base Elevation (GLOBE) digital Elevation Model)
• Klein Goldewijk et al., 2011  + (The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human-induced global land-use change over the past 12,000 years)
• Glibert et al., 2014b  + (The Haber Bosch-harmful algal bloom (HB-HAB) link)
• IMAGE-team, 2001  + (The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios. A comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21st century)
• Kram and Stehfest, 2012  + (The IMAGE Model Suite used for the OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050)
• Meinshausen et al., 2011c  + (The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300)
• Meinshausen et al., 2011  + (The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300)
• O'Neill et al., 2016  + (The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6)
• Van Vuuren et al., 2017a  + (The Shared Socio-economic Pathways: Trajectories for human development and global environmental change)
• Riahi et al., 2016  + (The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview)
• Riahi et al., 2017  + (The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview)
• Den Elzen et al., 2008b  + (The Triptych approach revisited: A staged sectoral approach for climate mitigation)
• UNEP-WCMC, 2011  + (The UK national ecosystem assessment: Synthesis of the key findings)
• WHO, 2002  + (The World Health Report 2002: Reducing risks, promoting healthy life)
• Schaeffer et al., 2007  + (The albedo climate impacts of biomass and carbon plantations compared with the co2 impact)
• Hof et al., 2012b  + (The benefits of climate change mitigation in integrated assessment models: The role of the carbon cycle and climate component)
• Lambin et al., 2001  + (The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths)
• Van Vuuren and O'Neill, 2006  + (The consistency of IPCC's SRES scenarios to recent literature and recent projections)
• Chen and Ravallion, 2008  + (The developing world Is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty)

• Beusen et al., 2011  + (The dynamic simulation and visualization software MyM)

• TEEB, 2010a  + (The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity ecological and economic foundations)
• Edenhofer et al., 2010  + (The economics of low stabilization: Model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs)
• Verburg et al., 2009  + (The effect of agricultural trade liberalisation on land-use related greenhouse gas emissions)
• Hof and Den Elzen, 2010  + (The effect of different historical emissions datasets on emission targets of the sectoral mitigation approach Triptych)
• Hof et al., 2009  + (The effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptation)
• Hof et al., 2013  + (The effect of updated pledges and business-as-usual projections, and new agreed rules on expected global greenhouse gas emissions in 2020)
• Hinkel et al., 2013  + (The effects of adaptation and mitigation on coastal flood impacts during the 21st century. An application of the DIVA and IMAGE models)
• Azar et al., 2010  + (The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS))
• FAO, 2018  + (The future of food and agriculture. Alternative pathways to 2050)
• MIT, 2003  + (The future of nuclear power - an interdisciplinary MIT study)
• Van Vuuren et al., 2006c  + (The future of vascular plant diversity under four global scenarios)
• Dentener et al., 2006b  + (The global atmospheric environment for the next generation)
• Le Quéré et al., 2013  + (The global carbon budget 1959-2011)
• Van Beek and Bierkens, 2009  + (The global hydrological model PCR-GLOBWB: conceptualization, parameterization and verification)
• Pastor et al., 2019  + (The global nexus of food–trade–water sustaining environmental flows by 2050)
• Fowler et al., 2013  + (The global nitrogen cycle in the Twentyfirst century)
• Brown, 2000  + (The global outlook for future wood supply from forest plantations)
• Van der Esch et al., 2021  + (The global potential for land restoration: Scenarios for the Global Land Outlook 2)
• Hertel, 2011  + (The global supply and demand for agricultural land in 2050: A perfect storm in the making?)
• KC and Lutz, forthcoming  + (The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100)
• Braddock et al., 1994  + (The image greenhouse model as a mathematical system)
• Mooij et al., 2005  + (The impact of climate change on lakes in the Netherlands: a review.)
• Van Meijl et al., 2006  + (The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe)
• Eickhout et al., 2009  + (The impact of environmental and climate constraints on global food supply)
• Eom et al., 2015  + (The impact of near-term climate policy choices on technology and emission transition pathways)