IMAGE framework summary/Description: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
''As far as global hunger is concerned, the Rio+20 scenario shows some clear improvement, in contrast to the last few decades. This improvement is a consequence of a rapid income growth in low-income regions and leveling-off of population growth.'' | ''As far as global hunger is concerned, the Rio+20 scenario shows some clear improvement, in contrast to the last few decades. This improvement is a consequence of a rapid income growth in low-income regions and leveling-off of population growth.'' | ||
[[File:017x img13.png|thumb|500px| | [[File:017x img13.png|thumb|500px|right|alt=Human development indicators in baseline scenario|Human development indicators]] | ||
====Other impacts==== | ====Other impacts==== | ||
Other impacts calculated by the IMAGE framework are not described here, including flood risks ([[Flood risks]]), land degradation ([[Soil degradation]]) and ecological goods and services ([[Ecosystem goods and services]]). | Other impacts calculated by the IMAGE framework are not described here, including flood risks ([[Flood risks]]), land degradation ([[Soil degradation]]) and ecological goods and services ([[Ecosystem goods and services]]). | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 12:17, 12 December 2013
Projects/Applications |
Relevant overviews |
Key publications |