Technical learning: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Status=On hold | |Status=On hold | ||
|Reference=Azar and Dowlatabadi, 1999; Grubler et al., 1999; Wene, 2000; Argotte and Epple, 1990; | |Reference=Azar and Dowlatabadi, 1999; Grubler et al., 1999; Wene, 2000; Argotte and Epple, 1990; | ||
|Description=An important aspect of the TIMER model is the endogenous formulation of technological development, on the basis of 'learning by doing'. The learning by doing description is considered a meaningful representation of technological change in global energy models ([[Azar and Dowlatabadi, 1999]]; [[Grubler et al., 1999]]; [[Wene, 2000]]). The general formulation of 'learning by doing' in a model context is that a cost measure tends to decline as a power function of an accumulated learning measure | |Description=An important aspect of the TIMER model is the endogenous formulation of technological development, on the basis of 'learning by doing'. The learning by doing description is considered a meaningful representation of technological change in global energy models ([[Azar and Dowlatabadi, 1999]]; [[Grubler et al., 1999]]; [[Wene, 2000]]). The general formulation of 'learning by doing' in a model context is that a cost measure tends to decline as a power function of an accumulated learning measure: | ||
Y= C * Q<sup>-ρ</sup> | Y= C * Q<sup>-ρ</sup> | ||