Rethinking Biodiversity Strategies (2010) project: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Rethinking Biodiversity Strategies (2010) to Rethinking Biodiversity Strategies (2010) project: Text replace - "Rethinking Biodiversity Strategies (2010)" to "Rethinking Biodiversity Strategies (2010) project") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Website=http://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/2010/Rethinking_Global_Biodiversity_Strategies | |Website=http://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/2010/Rethinking_Global_Biodiversity_Strategies | ||
|ApplicationType=1. Global integrated assessment | |ApplicationType=1. Global integrated assessment | ||
|KeyReference=PBL, 2010; | |Summary=The mere protection of valuable nature areas, although still necessary, will not be sufficient for reducing biodiversity loss. To strongly reduce the rate of global biodiversity loss in the coming decades, structural changes in consumption and production are needed. A reduction in meat consumption would be of great benefit. In addition, changes are needed especially in agriculture, forestry, fishery and in the supply of energy. | ||
|KeyReference=PBL, 2010; | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 15:51, 7 February 2014
Website: | http://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/2010/Rethinking_Global_Biodiversity_Strategies |
Application type: | 1. Global integrated assessment |
Summary: | The mere protection of valuable nature areas, although still necessary, will not be sufficient for reducing biodiversity loss. To strongly reduce the rate of global biodiversity loss in the coming decades, structural changes in consumption and production are needed. A reduction in meat consumption would be of great benefit. In addition, changes are needed especially in agriculture, forestry, fishery and in the supply of energy. |
Key publication(s): | PBL, 2010 |
Referred by: | Agricultural economy, Aquatic biodiversity, Forest management, Terrestrial biodiversity |