Land and biodiversity policies/Policy issues: Difference between revisions

From IMAGE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "Livestock" to "Livestock systems")
m (Text replace - "(Figure" to "(the figure")
Line 11: Line 11:
Various studies have made a comprehensive analysis of potential land-use policies, using the IMAGE framework. For instance, the report Rethinking Global Biodiversity Strategies ([[PBL, 2010]]) shows that a combination of the interventions mentioned here may have sufficient potential to reverse the trend of biodiversity loss. See also [[Rethinking Biodiversity Strategies (2010) project]].  
Various studies have made a comprehensive analysis of potential land-use policies, using the IMAGE framework. For instance, the report Rethinking Global Biodiversity Strategies ([[PBL, 2010]]) shows that a combination of the interventions mentioned here may have sufficient potential to reverse the trend of biodiversity loss. See also [[Rethinking Biodiversity Strategies (2010) project]].  


Roads from Rio+20 ([[PBL, 2012]]) formulated three packages of interventions to halt biodiversity loss by 2030 (Figure below). The three sustainability scenarios differ fundamentally in approach and indicate that substantial efforts are needed in many areas. In all cases, increases in agricultural productivity are needed (Figure below). See also [[Roads from Rio+20 (2012) project]].
Roads from Rio+20 ([[PBL, 2012]]) formulated three packages of interventions to halt biodiversity loss by 2030 (the figure below). The three sustainability scenarios differ fundamentally in approach and indicate that substantial efforts are needed in many areas. In all cases, increases in agricultural productivity are needed (the figure below). See also [[Roads from Rio+20 (2012) project]].
{{DisplayFigureLeftOptimalTemplate|Policy intervention figure LBP II}}
{{DisplayFigureLeftOptimalTemplate|Policy intervention figure LBP II}}
|PITable=No
|PITable=No

Revision as of 11:51, 24 June 2014