Property:HasEffectDescription
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is a property of type Text.
A
Reduces agricultural land use in regions with cost-optimal afforestation leading to higher food prices, lower food availability and changes in trade. +
Reduces agricultural land use in regions with cost-optimal afforestation leading to higher food prices, lower food availability and changes in trade. +
Impact of this policy intervention is a change in trade between regions, and consequently a change in production within a region for the different crop and livestock sectors. +
Change in land use for agriculture, will also result in a change in nature and thereby influence the ES dependent on nature (e.g. erosion and flood protection, pest control and pollination).
Large agricultural areas negatively influence the ES "nature based tourism", therefore change in agricultural land use will influence the ES "nature based tourism". +
Due to changed production in agricultural commodities, land use for agriculture within a region will change. +
C
Manually changing the generation capacity will result in a transition towards using more or less capacity of the selected generation type. +
In the climate policy component, the carbon tax leads to emission reductions via Marginal Abatement Cost (MAC) curves derived from the TIMER model. +
A carbon tax will induce a transition from carbon intensive fuel to carbon low fuels. Since hydrogen and electricity are well suited for carrying carbon low energy, the production of hydrogen and electricity could increase. +
The higher fossil fuel prices result in a shift towards less carbon-intensive energy carriers and (assuming a higher overall energy price) more energy efficiency. There can also be changes in end-use technologies ( e.g. electric cars in the transport sector, blast furnaces with CCS to produce iron and steel). +
The energy supply will change from the use of carbon intensive energy carriers to the use of low/zero carbon energy carriers. +
Induces a transition from carbon intensive fuels to carbon low fuels, thereby also lowering outdoor air pollution. Lower air pollution reduces mortality rates through reduced incidence of lung cancer, cardiopulmonary diseases and acute respiratory infections +
More intensive grassland management decrease the area needed for grassland, while producing the same amount of grass and/or feeding the same size of livestock. +
Increasing grazing intensity has no consequences for the livestock if not combined with introduction of better breeds +
Effects biodiversity in two ways: less grazing areas decrease the impact on habitats, while more intensive management or increased grazing intensity icnreases the pressures on biodiversity of the remaining areas. +
An interference with the share of fuel types, results in a change of the market share of the selected fuel types to the predetermined values. This again results in less conversion capacity of the selected fuel type. +
The share of the fuel in final energy consumption will be at least equal to the target. +
A change of the market share of the selected fuel types to the predetermined values. +
This policy intervention will result in more hydrogen or electricity production and generation capacity. +
An increase in the use of electricity and hydrogen at the end use level. Given the high flexibility in the choice of feedstock in electricity and hydrogen production this can increase the ability of the total system to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in a mitigation scenario. +
Changes demand for certain products, and subsequently production and trade of that product. +