Human development/Data uncertainties limitations: Difference between revisions

From IMAGE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ComponentDataUncertaintyAndLimitationsTemplate
{{ComponentDataUncertaintyAndLimitationsTemplate
|Reference=FAO, 2012a; WHO/UNICEF, 2012; Hutton and Haller, 2004; Hutton et al., 2006; WHO, 2009; World Bank, 2009; Chen and Ravallion, 2008; Ackah et al., 2009; Lutz et al., 2007; FAO, 2001b; WHO/UNICEF, 2012;
|Reference=FAO, 2012a; WHO/UNICEF, 2012; Hutton and Haller, 2004; Hutton et al., 2006; WHO, 2009; World Bank, 2009; Chen and Ravallion, 2008; Ackah et al., 2009; Lutz et al., 2007; FAO, 2001b; WHO/UNICEF, 2012;
|Description=<h2>Data, uncertainties and limitations</h2>
}}<div class="page_standard">
==Data, uncertainty and limitations==
===Data===
===Data===


Line 25: Line 26:


Furthermore, although health service efficacy and school enrolment ratios are driven in the model by investments in health and education services, these investments are not restricted by a limit on total investments. Similarly, the investments in drinking water and sanitation are not made explicit in the model but are derived from achieved coverage. Thus, instead of analysing the effect of specific investments in health outcomes, analysis can only be done by using pre-determined what-if scenarios.
Furthermore, although health service efficacy and school enrolment ratios are driven in the model by investments in health and education services, these investments are not restricted by a limit on total investments. Similarly, the investments in drinking water and sanitation are not made explicit in the model but are derived from achieved coverage. Thus, instead of analysing the effect of specific investments in health outcomes, analysis can only be done by using pre-determined what-if scenarios.
}}
</div>

Latest revision as of 18:48, 15 November 2018

Data, uncertainty and limitations

Data

Most data used in GISMO originate from specific UN institutions or the World Bank:

Uncertainties

The broad range of issues addressed leads to a range of uncertainties. Only the data uncertainties related to access to food, water and energy and the related health risks are considered.

Per-capita food intake is based on FAOSTAT data, applied as averages per region, in the first year, and extended into the future by using food consumption data from the agro-economic model MAGNET (Component Agricultural economy). The trends in per-capita food availability use income elasticities for broad groups of crops and animal products, but these trends are not necessarily linked to physical limitations on consumption levels. For water and energy, aggregations of different technologies to broad groups mask the underlying heterogeneity, and thus lead to uncertainties in model behaviour. Improved access to water supply and sanitation encompasses a broad range of forms of connection, each of which is assumed to carry the same potential health risk. The same is the case for access to modern energy sources for cooking and heating that encompass a broad range of traditional fuel and fuel-stove combinations. Health impacts are based on exposure-response relationships, and these are assumed to be the same worldwide and to remain constant over time. Many parameters are based on cross-sectional relationships with per-capita GDP (PPP), making the outcomes heavily dependent on this parameter.

Limitations

The model also has several limitations, and specifically limited representation of the heterogeneous characteristics within populations. In most cases, a population average combined with a stylised distribution function is applied. This may not fully represent the distributional aspects, as in reality many of these issues may be concentrated in particular populations, and, more importantly, these distribution functions do not change in the model over time, while they probably do in reality.

Furthermore, although health service efficacy and school enrolment ratios are driven in the model by investments in health and education services, these investments are not restricted by a limit on total investments. Similarly, the investments in drinking water and sanitation are not made explicit in the model but are derived from achieved coverage. Thus, instead of analysing the effect of specific investments in health outcomes, analysis can only be done by using pre-determined what-if scenarios.