Forest management: Difference between revisions

From IMAGE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(62 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ComponentTemplate2
{{ComponentTemplate2
|IMAGEComponent=Scenario drivers; Agricultural systems; Natural vegetation and carbon cycle
|Application=Rethinking Biodiversity Strategies (2010) project;Shared Socioeconomic Pathways - SSP (2014) project;EU Seventh Framework Programme - FP7;LUC4C
|InputVar=Timber demand; Demand for traditional biomass; Fraction of traditional biomass coming from non-forested land; Carbon pools in vegetation - grid; Fraction selective cut;; Harvest efficiency; Suitability; Land cover, land use - grid;  
|IMAGEComponent=Drivers;Land-use allocation;Carbon cycle and natural vegetation;Energy supply and demand
FAO deforestation rates; Demand for Forest plantations;
|KeyReference=Arets et al., 2011
|OutputVar=Timber use fraction; Harvested wood, divided over the 3 timber types - grid;  Forest residues that remain in forest grid; Forest management type - grid; Area Regrowth forest - grid; Area degraded forest -grid
|Reference=Carle and Holmgren, 2008;Putz et al., 2012;FAO, 2006b;Alkemade et al., 2009;Hartmann et al., 2010;FAO, 2015;Dagnachew et al., 2018;Dagnachew et al., 2020;Doelman et al., 2019;Doelman et al., 2020b;FAO, 2020
|Description==== Global context ===
|InputVar=Demand traditional biomass;Land cover, land use - grid;Forest plantation demand;Harvest efficiency;Timber demand;Carbon pools in vegetation - grid;Fraction of selective logging;Agricultural land use suitability - grid
|Parameter=Traditional biomass from non-forest land;FAO deforestation rates
|OutputVar=Timber use fraction;Forest residues;Forest management type - grid;Regrowth forest area - grid;Harvested wood;Degraded forest area
|ComponentCode=FM
|AggregatedComponent=Agriculture and land use
|FrameworkElementType=pressure component
}}
<div class="page_standard">
The global forest area and wooded land area has been estimated for 2010 at just over 40 and 11 million km<sup>2</sup>, respectively ([[FAO, 2020]]). Forest resources are used for multitude of purposes, including timber, fuel, food, water and other forest-related goods and services. In addition, (semi-) natural forests are home to many highly valued species of interest for nature conservation and biodiversity.


The world’s total forest area in 2010 is estimated to be just over 40 million km2. In addition there is about 10 million km2 of ‘forested land’(FAO, 2010). These forest resources ares used by man for a multitude of purposes, such as timber, fuel, food, water and other forest related goods and services. Notwithstanding the undisputed market and non-market value of forests, the area of forests still declines worldwide, with distinct differences over world regions. Total global deforestation has decreased in the last decade, but still occurs at significant scale in large parts of Latin-America, Africa and South East Asia. At the same time net forest expansion takes place in other regions such as Europe and China. The main pressure driving deforestation is agricultural expansion. In addition to the loss of forest area, degradation processes and declining supply of services may occur as a result of human use of forests. Managing the global forest resource in a sustainable way may help to preserve forests, reduce or revert the degradation process, and simultaneously conserve the services like biodiversity and carbon stocks within forests (FAO, 2010).  
The total global forest area is continuing to decline at difference rates in different world regions. Although the rate of global deforestation has decreased in the last decade, deforestation is still occurring on a significant scale in large parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeastern Asia. At the same time, the net forest area is expanding in some regions, such as in Europe and China ([[FAO, 2020]]). Sustainable management of global forest resources may contribute to preserving forests, slowing down or reversing degradation processes, and conserving forest biodiversity and carbon stocks ([[FAO, 2020]]).  


Several types of forest management systems, are in use  to meet the worldwide demand of timber, paper and board, biofuels and other services. The prevailing management practices depend on forest type, conservation policies and regulation, economics, and other –often local- factors,. They differ with respect to wood produced per area, the rotation cycle, and the carbon-content and biodiversity state of forested areas. In addition, the harvested wood  can be  used in various ways, for instance as timber, pulp, paper, traditional fuelwood and modern bio-energy.
Several types of forest management systems are employed in meeting the worldwide demand for timber, paper, fibreboard, traditional or modern bioenergy and other products. Management practices depend on forest type, conservation policies and regulation, economics, and other, often local, factors. Practices differ with respect to timber volume harvested per area, rotation cycle, and carbon content and state of biodiversity of the forested areas.  


=== Forestry in the IMAGE 3.0 model ===
Modelling of forests and forest management is an integral part of the IMAGE 3.2 framework, with a simulated forest area in 2010 at about 47 million km<sup>2</sup> , somewhat larger than observed by {{abbrTemplate|FAO}} as this area includes fractions of other wooded land (see Component [[Carbon cycle and natural vegetation]]). To manage these forests, three forest management systems are defined in IMAGE 3.2 in a simplification of the range of management systems implemented worldwide ([[Carle and Holmgren, 2008]]; [[Arets et al., 2011]]).
# The first forest management system is clear cutting or clear felling, in which all trees in an area are cut down followed by natural or ‘assisted’ regrowth, as widely applied in temperate regions.
# The second forest management system is selective logging of (semi)natural forests, in which only trees of the highest economic value are felled, commonly used in tropical forests with a high heterogeneity of tree species. An ecological variant of selective logging is reduced impact logging ({{abbrTemplate|RIL}}) directed to reducing harvest damage, stimulating regrowth and maintaining biodiversity levels ([[Putz et al., 2012]]).
# The third forest management system considered in IMAGE 3.2 is forest plantations, such as hardwood tree plantations in the tropics, and poplar plantations in temperate regions. Selected tree species, either endemic or exotic to the area, are planted and managed intensively, for example through pest control, irrigation and fertiliser use, to maximise production. Forest plantation growth is modelled in LPJmL and was recalibrated in IMAGE 3.2 to empirical data ([[Braakhekke et al., 2019]]) as forest plantations generally have a higher productivity level than natural forests ([[FAO, 2006b]]). By producing more wood products on less land, plantations may contribute to more sustainable forest management by reducing pressure on natural forests ([[Carle and Holmgren, 2008]]; [[Alkemade et al., 2009]]). However, the ecological value of biodiversity in many forest plantations is relatively low ([[Hartmann et al., 2010]]).


Because of the importance of forest management for the functioning and state of forests, its modelling has become an important and integral part of the IMAGE 3.0 model. Three types of forest management systems are defined in IMAGE 3.0  as a simplification of the whole range of possible management systems (Carle and Holmgren, 2008; Arets et al., 2011). The purpose of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) is to preserve the forests, their production capacity and biodiversity for future generations, and to counteract forest degradation processes. In IMAGE, several elements of SFM are included when defining policy options , e.g.  consisting of shifts in the mix of  forestry management systems.
{{InputOutputParameterTemplate}}
 
</div>
The first management type in IMAGE is clearcut or clear felling. This is a management system in which all trees in an area are cut down , after which regrowth  can take place, either naturally or assisted by management.. It is applied often in temperate regions, where stands are often monocultures of specific endemic species.
 
Secondly, selective logging is a system in which only the trees with the most economical value are felled. This is more common in tropical forests with high heterogeneity of  tree species. Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) is an ecological variant of selective logging, aiming to reduce harvest damage, stimulate regrowth and maintain biodiversity (Putz et al., 2012). As such, the RIL system is a more ecological sustainable forestry system and is promoted under SFM-schemes.
 
The third system is the plantation and management of wood plantation, like hardwood plantations in the tropics  and eucalyptus plantations in temperate regions.  Selected  tree species, either endemic or exotic to the area, are planted and managed more intensively –for example through irrigation and fertilizer use- to maximize production and/or wood quality.  After the trees are harvested new ones are planted, and management is put in place . Wood plantations have generally a high productivity, but need to be established on available suitable land (Del Lungo et al., 2006). By producing  more wood and other products on  less land, plantations may help in Sustainable Forest Management by reducing the pressures on natural forests (Carle and Homgren, 2008, Alkemade et al, 2009). At the same time, the ecological value of/biodiversity in many forest plantations is relatively low (Hartman et al, 2010).
|ComponentCode=FM
|AggregatedComponent=Agriculture and land use
|FrameworkElementType=pressure component
}}

Latest revision as of 18:14, 22 November 2021

Key policy issues

  • How can management influence forest capacity to meet future demand for wood and other ecosystem services?
  • What are the implications of forest management for pristine and managed forest areas, and on biomass and carbon stocks and fluxes of relevance for climate policy?
  • What are the prospects for more sustainable forest management and the role of production in dedicated forest plantations?

Introduction

The global forest area and wooded land area has been estimated for 2010 at just over 40 and 11 million km2, respectively (FAO, 2020). Forest resources are used for multitude of purposes, including timber, fuel, food, water and other forest-related goods and services. In addition, (semi-) natural forests are home to many highly valued species of interest for nature conservation and biodiversity.

The total global forest area is continuing to decline at difference rates in different world regions. Although the rate of global deforestation has decreased in the last decade, deforestation is still occurring on a significant scale in large parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeastern Asia. At the same time, the net forest area is expanding in some regions, such as in Europe and China (FAO, 2020). Sustainable management of global forest resources may contribute to preserving forests, slowing down or reversing degradation processes, and conserving forest biodiversity and carbon stocks (FAO, 2020).

Several types of forest management systems are employed in meeting the worldwide demand for timber, paper, fibreboard, traditional or modern bioenergy and other products. Management practices depend on forest type, conservation policies and regulation, economics, and other, often local, factors. Practices differ with respect to timber volume harvested per area, rotation cycle, and carbon content and state of biodiversity of the forested areas.

Modelling of forests and forest management is an integral part of the IMAGE 3.2 framework, with a simulated forest area in 2010 at about 47 million km2 , somewhat larger than observed by FAO as this area includes fractions of other wooded land (see Component Carbon cycle and natural vegetation). To manage these forests, three forest management systems are defined in IMAGE 3.2 in a simplification of the range of management systems implemented worldwide (Carle and Holmgren, 2008; Arets et al., 2011).

  1. The first forest management system is clear cutting or clear felling, in which all trees in an area are cut down followed by natural or ‘assisted’ regrowth, as widely applied in temperate regions.
  2. The second forest management system is selective logging of (semi)natural forests, in which only trees of the highest economic value are felled, commonly used in tropical forests with a high heterogeneity of tree species. An ecological variant of selective logging is reduced impact logging (RIL) directed to reducing harvest damage, stimulating regrowth and maintaining biodiversity levels (Putz et al., 2012).
  3. The third forest management system considered in IMAGE 3.2 is forest plantations, such as hardwood tree plantations in the tropics, and poplar plantations in temperate regions. Selected tree species, either endemic or exotic to the area, are planted and managed intensively, for example through pest control, irrigation and fertiliser use, to maximise production. Forest plantation growth is modelled in LPJmL and was recalibrated in IMAGE 3.2 to empirical data (Braakhekke et al., 2019) as forest plantations generally have a higher productivity level than natural forests (FAO, 2006b). By producing more wood products on less land, plantations may contribute to more sustainable forest management by reducing pressure on natural forests (Carle and Holmgren, 2008; Alkemade et al., 2009). However, the ecological value of biodiversity in many forest plantations is relatively low (Hartmann et al., 2010).

Input/Output Table

Input Forest management component

IMAGE model drivers and variablesDescriptionSource
Fraction of selective logging The fraction of forest harvested in a grid, in clear cutting, selective cutting, wood plantations and additional deforestation. Fraction of selective cut determines the fraction of timber harvested by selective cutting of trees in semi-natural and natural forest. Drivers
Forest plantation demand Demand for forest plantation area. Drivers
Harvest efficiency Fraction of harvested wood used as product, the remainder being left as residues. Specified per biomass pool and forestry management type. Drivers
Timber demand Demand for roundwood and pulpwood per region. Drivers
Agricultural land use suitability - grid Suitability of land in a grid cell for agriculture and forestry, as a function of accessibility, population density, slope and potential crop yields.
Land cover, land use - grid Multi-dimensional map describing all aspects of land cover and land use per grid cell, such as type of natural vegetation, crop and grass fraction, crop management, fertiliser and manure input, livestock density. Land cover and land use
Carbon pools in vegetation - grid Carbon pools in leaves, stems, branches and roots). Carbon cycle and natural vegetation
Demand traditional biomass Regional demand for traditional bioenergy. Energy demand
External datasetsDescriptionSource
FAO deforestation rates Historical deforestation rates according to FAO. FAO
Traditional biomass from non-forest land Fraction of traditional fuelwood from non-forestry sources, such as orchard, assumed to be 50% (low-income countries) and 68% (middle-income countries). FAO

Output Forest management component

IMAGE model variablesDescriptionUse
Harvested wood Wood harvested and removed.
Degraded forest area Permanently deforested areas for reasons other than expansion of agricultural land (calibrated to FAO deforestation statistics).
Timber use fraction Fractions of harvested timber entering the fast-decaying timber pool, the slow-decaying timber pool, or burnt as traditional biofuels.
Forest management type - grid Forest management type: clear cut, selective logging, forest plantation or additional deforestation.
Regrowth forest area - grid Areas of re-growing forests after agricultural abandonment or timber harvest.
Forest residues Harvest losses (from damaged trees and unusable tree parts) or harvest residues that are left in the forest by purpose because of environmental concerns. These losses/residues remains in the forest after harvest, in in principle enter the soil pools. But they could also be used for other/energy purposes. Final output