Livestock systems/Data uncertainties limitations

Component is implemented in:

IMAGE land management model (version IMAGE land management 3.2) Components: Emissions Forest management Land cover and land use Land-use allocation Livestock systems Nutrients

Related IMAGE components

Agricultural economy Agriculture and land use Atmospheric composition and climate Crops and grass Drivers Land-use allocation

Projects/Applications

EU Resource efficiency (2011) project Global Environmental Outlook - GEO3 (2002) project Global Environmental Outlook - GEO4 (2007) project Millennium Ecosystem Assessment - MA (2005) project OECD Environmental Outlook to 2030 (2008) project OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050 (2012) project Roads from Rio+20 (2012) project

Models/Databases

MAGNET model

Key publications

Bouwman et al., 2005

References

Beusen et al., 2008 Bouwman et al., 2005 FAO, 2012a Seré and Steinfeld, 1996

Flowchart Livestock systems. See also the Input/Output Table on the introduction page.

Data, uncertainty and limitations

Data

Historical livestock numbers, milk production per animal, off-take rates and carcass weights were obtained from FAO (FAO, 2012a). For ruminants, the production systems have been aggregated to two systems: pastoral, and mixed & landless production systems (Bouwman et al., 2005). For pigs and poultry three systems are distinguished. For pigs these are backyard, intermediate and intensive systems, and for poultry these are backyard, broiler and laying hens systems (Lassaletta et al., 2019).

Uncertainties

There are several uncertainties in the calculation of livestock production in the different systems for historical years and scenarios. The first uncertainty is the aggregation level on the scale of country or world region, which does not take account of underlying heterogeneity. The second uncertainty concerns the use of average data for carcass weight, off-take rate, and milk production for total livestock populations. In reality, livestock populations cover different age classes, and not all animals in a population are productive. Calculations, such as energy requirement for maintenance, are a non-linear function of body weight, and thus use of average values, may lead to distortion. The third uncertainty is associated with livestock numbers. Methodology and frequency of data collection (for example, by census) vary between countries, and are probably less certain for some developing countries than for industrialised countries. This uncertainty on livestock numbers affects not only the livestock module, but also all impact IMAGE modules that depend on livestock numbers, such as ammonia emissions (Beusen et al., 2008).

The main uncertainties in construction scenarios concern agricultural demand (Agricultural economy), the distribution of production over the two systems, and production characteristics per system, including feed requirements and feed types.

Limitations

The key limitation in the current livestock module is that the ruminant livestock system have a soft linkage to the agricultural economy model MAGNET (Agricultural economy). Although MAGNET has some representation of feed substitution and intensification as a result of land scarcity, and mimics the dynamics described here, there is no explicit representation of livestock systems and physically based feed compositions.