Air pollution and energy policies/Policy issues: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Each energy policy subject is associated with a set of policy interventions. Subjects are followed by a table with specific policy interventions on the subject. The table at the bottom sums the policy interventions that concern air pollution reduction as well as energy security. | Each energy policy subject is associated with a set of policy interventions. Subjects are followed by a table with specific policy interventions on the subject. The table at the bottom sums the policy interventions that concern air pollution reduction as well as energy security. | ||
|PISet=Changes in consumption and diet preferences; | |PISet=Changes in consumption and diet preferences; | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 25: | Line 24: | ||
IMAGE is used to explore policies to improve energy security, particularly import restrictions, fuel preferences and import taxes. The model is used to project the consequences of climate policy on energy security, and in fact scenarios show that climate policy has co-benefits that improve energy security. Possible benefits include reduced international trade, increased fuel diversity and slower depletion of fossil resources (PBL, 2012). Analysis shows that import restrictions have a temporary impact on energy security, leading to faster depletion of domestic resources, thus reducing long-term energy security (Kruyt et al., 2009). | IMAGE is used to explore policies to improve energy security, particularly import restrictions, fuel preferences and import taxes. The model is used to project the consequences of climate policy on energy security, and in fact scenarios show that climate policy has co-benefits that improve energy security. Possible benefits include reduced international trade, increased fuel diversity and slower depletion of fossil resources (PBL, 2012). Analysis shows that import restrictions have a temporary impact on energy security, leading to faster depletion of domestic resources, thus reducing long-term energy security (Kruyt et al., 2009). | ||
|PISet=Restrictions on fuel trade; | |PISet=Restrictions on fuel trade; | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{PolicyInterventionSetTemplate | {{PolicyInterventionSetTemplate | ||
|Header=Energy access | |Header=Energy access | ||
|Description= | |Description=''Baseline developments'' | ||
''Baseline developments'' | |||
IMAGE can also be used to consider energy access issues. The baseline scenario of the Rio+20 report shows that without additional policy by 2030, 2.6 billion people will continue to depend on solid fuels for cooking and heating and 1 billion people will have no access to electricity (PBL, 2012). Low energy access has been reported to lead to development issues and to environmental issues. | IMAGE can also be used to consider energy access issues. The baseline scenario of the Rio+20 report shows that without additional policy by 2030, 2.6 billion people will continue to depend on solid fuels for cooking and heating and 1 billion people will have no access to electricity (PBL, 2012). Low energy access has been reported to lead to development issues and to environmental issues. | ||
Line 36: | Line 34: | ||
''Policy interventions'' | ''Policy interventions'' | ||
The model defines access to modern energy sources for cooking and heating by either using modern fuels or improved biomass stoves. To make the transition, the IMAGE analysis include measures such as increased investments in the power grid (for access to electricity), fuel subsidies and grants, and micro-lending facilities for easier access to credit and lower borrowing costs for households (Van Ruijven, 2008) . For households for which the shift from biomass may still be out of reach under the induced financial policies, improved biomass stoves are distributed as a cost-effective interim solution. The Roads from Rio+20 report (PBL, 2012), for instance, explored measures, such as subsidies and grid extension, to achieve 95 % grid connectivity and use of modern fuels for cooking and heating in 2030. | The model defines access to modern energy sources for cooking and heating by either using modern fuels or improved biomass stoves. To make the transition, the IMAGE analysis include measures such as increased investments in the power grid (for access to electricity), fuel subsidies and grants, and micro-lending facilities for easier access to credit and lower borrowing costs for households (Van Ruijven, 2008) . For households for which the shift from biomass may still be out of reach under the induced financial policies, improved biomass stoves are distributed as a cost-effective interim solution. The Roads from Rio+20 report (PBL, 2012), for instance, explored measures, such as subsidies and grid extension, to achieve 95 % grid connectivity and use of modern fuels for cooking and heating in 2030. | ||
|PISet=Provision on improved stoves for traditional bio-energy; Subsidies on modern energy; | |||
|PISet=Provision on improved stoves for traditional bio-energy; Subsidies on modern energy; | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{PolicyInterventionSetTemplate | {{PolicyInterventionSetTemplate | ||
Line 49: | Line 46: | ||
Emissions of air pollutants may be reduced by either a change in energy use or end-of-pipe abatement measures. In IMAGE, the first policy category can be modelled explicitly, for instance, as a result of climate policy. Many technologies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions also lead to less emissions of air pollutants. End-of-pipe policies can only be implemented by changing the emission factors (in an aggregated way). However, by relating improvement rates to those of more explicit models, it is still possible to perform policy relevant experiments. | Emissions of air pollutants may be reduced by either a change in energy use or end-of-pipe abatement measures. In IMAGE, the first policy category can be modelled explicitly, for instance, as a result of climate policy. Many technologies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions also lead to less emissions of air pollutants. End-of-pipe policies can only be implemented by changing the emission factors (in an aggregated way). However, by relating improvement rates to those of more explicit models, it is still possible to perform policy relevant experiments. | ||
|PISet=Implementation of sustainability criteria in bio-energy production; Carbon tax; | |||
|PISet=Implementation of sustainability criteria in bio-energy production; | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{PolicyInterventionSetTemplate | {{PolicyInterventionSetTemplate | ||
|Header= | |Header=Air pollution and energy access | ||
|PISet=Excluding certain technologies; | |PISet=Apply emission and energy intensity standards; Capacity targets; Change market shares of fuel types; Change the use of electricity and hydrogen; Excluding certain technologies; Implementation of biofuel targets; Improving energy efficiency; Production targets for energy technologies; | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ContentPartsTemplate}} | {{ContentPartsTemplate}} | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 15:39, 8 April 2014
Parts of Air pollution and energy policies/Policy issues
Component is implemented in: |
Related IMAGE components |
Projects/Applications |
Key publications |
References |
Energy security
Baseline developments
While the concept of energy security is widely used, there is no consensus on its interpretation. Some focus on one aspect of energy security, such as resource estimates, reserve-to-production ratios, diversity indices and, import dependence, while others attempt to capture several elements in a single aggregated index.
On the basis of IMAGE results, a wide set of indicators can be calculated to make a broad assessment of changes (Kruyt et al., 2009). IMAGE results show that in baseline scenarios without additional policy, depletion of known fossil resources accelerates as a result of increasing global demand. Oil production is projected to become increasingly concentrated in fewer producing countries in the 2010–2030 period. After 2030/2050 the market will diversify with production of unconventional sources from other regions. For natural gas and certainly for coal, depletion dynamics are less observable in IMAGE results.
Policy interventions
IMAGE is used to explore policies to improve energy security, particularly import restrictions, fuel preferences and import taxes. The model is used to project the consequences of climate policy on energy security, and in fact scenarios show that climate policy has co-benefits that improve energy security. Possible benefits include reduced international trade, increased fuel diversity and slower depletion of fossil resources (PBL, 2012). Analysis shows that import restrictions have a temporary impact on energy security, leading to faster depletion of domestic resources, thus reducing long-term energy security (Kruyt et al., 2009).
Policy intervention | Description | Implemented in/affected component |
---|---|---|
Restrictions on fuel trade | As part of energy security policies, fuel trade between different regions can be blocked. |
(*) Implementing component.
Energy access
Baseline developments
IMAGE can also be used to consider energy access issues. The baseline scenario of the Rio+20 report shows that without additional policy by 2030, 2.6 billion people will continue to depend on solid fuels for cooking and heating and 1 billion people will have no access to electricity (PBL, 2012). Low energy access has been reported to lead to development issues and to environmental issues.
Policy interventions
The model defines access to modern energy sources for cooking and heating by either using modern fuels or improved biomass stoves. To make the transition, the IMAGE analysis include measures such as increased investments in the power grid (for access to electricity), fuel subsidies and grants, and micro-lending facilities for easier access to credit and lower borrowing costs for households (Van Ruijven, 2008) . For households for which the shift from biomass may still be out of reach under the induced financial policies, improved biomass stoves are distributed as a cost-effective interim solution. The Roads from Rio+20 report (PBL, 2012), for instance, explored measures, such as subsidies and grid extension, to achieve 95 % grid connectivity and use of modern fuels for cooking and heating in 2030.
Policy intervention | Description | Implemented in/affected component |
---|---|---|
Provision on improved stoves for traditional bio-energy | Increases the efficiency of bio-energy use. | |
Subsidies on modern energy | Reduces the costs of modern energy to reduce traditional energy use (can be targeted to low income groups). |
(*) Implementing component.
Air pollution
Baseline developments
Indoor and outdoor air pollution which have negative health impacts are key issues for energy policies. IMAGE is used to explore air pollution policies, particularly in relation to climate policy. In the baseline scenario of the Rio+20 project, for instance, emissions of air pollutants remain at high levels globally (PBL, 2012). Black carbon emissions are projected to decrease towards 2050, while SO2 emissions remain constant and NOx emissions increase. Another key factor is the ageing population because the impacts of air pollution are felt especially by the elderly.
Policy intervention
Emissions of air pollutants may be reduced by either a change in energy use or end-of-pipe abatement measures. In IMAGE, the first policy category can be modelled explicitly, for instance, as a result of climate policy. Many technologies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions also lead to less emissions of air pollutants. End-of-pipe policies can only be implemented by changing the emission factors (in an aggregated way). However, by relating improvement rates to those of more explicit models, it is still possible to perform policy relevant experiments.
Policy intervention | Description | Implemented in/affected component |
---|---|---|
Implementation of sustainability criteria in bio-energy production | Sustainability criteria that could become binding for dedicated bio-energy production, such as the restrictive use of water-scarce or degraded areas. | |
Carbon tax | A tax on carbon leads to higher prices for carbon intensive fuels (such as fossil fuels), making low-carbon alternatives more attractive. |
(*) Implementing component.
Air pollution and energy access
Policy intervention | Description | Implemented in/affected component |
---|---|---|
Apply emission and energy intensity standards | Apply emission intensity standards for e.g. cars (gCO2/km), power plants (gCO2/kWh) or appliances (kWh/hour). | |
Capacity targets | It is possible to prescribe the shares of renewables, CCS technology, nuclear power and other forms of generation capacity. This measure influences the amount of capacity installed of the technology chosen. | |
Change market shares of fuel types | Exogenously set the market shares of certain fuel types. This can be done for specific analyses or scenarios to explore the broader implications of increasing the use of, for instance, biofuels, electricity or hydrogen and reflects the impact of fuel targets. | |
Change the use of electricity and hydrogen | It is possible to promote the use of electricity and hydrogen at the end-use level. | |
Excluding certain technologies | Certain energy technology options can be excluded in the model for environmental, societal, and/or security reasons. | |
Implementation of biofuel targets | Policies to enhance the use of biofuels, especially in the transport sector. In the Agricultural economy component only 'first generation' crops are taken into account. The policy is implemented as a budget-neutral policy from government perspective, e.g. a subsidy is implemented to achieve a certain share of biofuels in fuel production and an end-user tax is applied to counterfinance the implemented subsidy. | |
Improving energy efficiency | Exogenously set improvement in efficiency. Such improvements can be introduced for the submodels that focus on particular technologies, for example, in transport, heavy industry and households submodels. | |
Production targets for energy technologies | Production targets for energy technologies can be set to force technologies through a learning curve. |
(*) Implementing component.
}}