Atmospheric composition and climate/Policy issues: Difference between revisions

From IMAGE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "Overmars et al. (unpublished)" to "Overmars et al., accepted")
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ComponentPolicyIssueTemplate
{{ComponentPolicyIssueTemplate
|Reference=Overmars et al., accepted; Van Vuuren and Stehfest, 2013; Shindell et al., 2012;
|Reference=Overmars et al., accepted; Van Vuuren and Stehfest, 2013; Shindell et al., 2012;
|Description=Baseline developments: In baseline scenarios, emissions and greenhouse gas concentrations increase substantially. The increase in emissions depends on socio-economic factors, such as population growth, economic growth, technology development and lifestyle. Most medium baseline scenarios in IMAGE result in a rise in global mean temperature of about 3 to 5 °C above pre-industrial levels by 2100 (see figure below **Figures zijn nog anders dan in chapter).
|Description=In baseline scenarios, emissions and greenhouse gas concentrations increase substantially. The increase in emissions depends on socio-economic factors, such as population growth, economic growth, technology development and lifestyle. Most medium baseline scenarios in IMAGE result in a rise in global mean temperature of about 3 to 5 °C above pre-industrial levels by 2100 (Figure below).  
|Example=Policy interventions that affect future climate range from policy on energy and agricultural systems, air pollution measures, and land-use policies to direct management of radiative forcing. For instance, the IMAGE system can be used to analyse energy efficiency, use of low-carbon fuels, reduction in non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions and reduction of deforestation ([[Overmars et al., accepted]]). Interventions related to policies on climate, air pollution and land use are described in [[Climate policy]], [[Air pollution and energy policies]] and [[Land and biodiversity policies]]. These measures lead to a change in emissions, and then to the expected reduction in radiative forcing and climate change.  
|Example=Policy interventions that affect future climate range from policy on energy and agricultural systems, air pollution measures, and land-use policies to direct management of radiative forcing. For instance, the IMAGE system can be used to analyse energy efficiency, use of low-carbon fuels, reduction in non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions and reduction of deforestation ([[Overmars et al., accepted]]). Interventions related to policies on climate, air pollution and land use are described in Componens [[Climate policy]], [[Air pollution and energy policies]] and [[Land and biodiversity policies]], respectively. These measures lead to a change in emissions, and then to the expected reduction in radiative forcing and climate change.  


The slow temporal dynamics of the climate system play an important role in climate policy assessments. IMAGE calculations show considerable time lag between policy introduction and impacts on climate change. Even if emissions were substantially reduced from 2020 and onwards, several decades would elapse before reduction in temperature in the global climate system is observed (see figure below). In addition to these standard climate measures, a range of policy interventions may play a role in the temporal dynamics of the climate system, and may be analysed using the IMAGE system:
The slow temporal dynamics of the climate system play an important role in climate policy assessments. IMAGE calculations show considerable time lag between policy introduction and impacts on climate change. Even if emissions were substantially reduced from 2020 and onwards, several decades would elapse before stabilization in temperature in the global climate system is observed (Figure above). In addition to these standard climate measures, a range of policy interventions may play a role in the temporal dynamics of the climate system, and may be analysed using the IMAGE system:
 
* Mitigation in short-lived versus long-lived greenhouse gas emissions, and co-benefits with air pollution measures ([[Shindell et al., 2012]]). Short-term benefits in air quality and climate mitigation may be achieved by reducing black carbon emissions and ozone precursors.  
[[**interventions...]]
* Non-mitigation management of global radiative forcing, such as by means of geo-engineering as shown in Figure below ([[Van Vuuren and Stehfest, 2013]]).
 
See also the Policy interventions Table below
In the policy scenarios, emissions decrease substantially after 2020 but concentration levels only decrease or stabilise after 2050. Because of inertia in the climate system, global mean temperature will not stabilise until the end of this century under the most ambitious climate policy scenario (2.6 W/m2).
 
In addition to conventional climate policy, some situations may require urgent action on climate change, either rapid mitigation or solar radiation management (SRM) such as sulphur emissions to the stratosphere. Radiative forcing is immediately stabilised at the intended level by SRM, and temperatures are also adjusted immediately (though not yet at equilibrium level), and even faster under extreme SRM than would be possible through strong mitigation. However, substantial uncertainties and risks are related to such drastic manipulations of the radiation balance.
}}
}}

Revision as of 19:21, 20 May 2014