Emissions/Policy issues: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ComponentPolicyIssueTemplate | {{ComponentPolicyIssueTemplate | ||
|Reference=PBL, 2012; | |Reference=PBL, 2012; | ||
|Description=In a baseline scenario, | |Description=In a baseline scenario, most greenhouse gas emissions tend to increase, driven by an increase in underlying activity levels (Figure This is shown in Figure 5.2.2 for a baseline scenario for the [[Roads from Rio+20 (2012) project|Rio+20]] study ([[PBL, 2012]]). For air pollutants, the pattern also depends strongly on the assumptions on air pollution control. In most baseline scenarios, air pollutant emissions tend to decrease, or at least stabilise, in the coming decades as a result of more stringent environmental standards in high and middle income countries. | ||
|Example=In the figure below we compare for the air pollutants SO2 and NOx the impacts of introducing more ambitious air pollution control policies (CLE versus EKC) and the influence of climate policy. Wherile climate policy is particularly effective in reducing SO2 emissions, air pollution control policies are effective in reducing NOx emissions. | |Example=In the figure below we compare for the air pollutants SO2 and NOx the impacts of introducing more ambitious air pollution control policies (CLE versus EKC) and the influence of climate policy. Wherile climate policy is particularly effective in reducing SO2 emissions, air pollution control policies are effective in reducing NOx emissions. | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 13:45, 21 May 2014
Parts of Emissions/Policy issues
Component is implemented in: |
Components:and
|
Projects/Applications |
Models/Databases |
Key publications |
References |