Parts of Nutrients
|Component is implemented in:|
|Related IMAGE components|
Under baseline scenarios of IMAGE-GNM, N surpluses generally increase. For example, in the Rio+20 baseline scenario, the N surplus increases by 35% globally in the period 2002-2050 (the figure below). This is the result of decreasing trends in North America, Western Europe and Japan as a result of increasing nutrient use efficiency, and stabilisation in India. In all other regions, N surpluses increase, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeastern Asia as a result of increasing fertilizer use to halt soil nutrient depletion (the figure below). The situation is similar for P, with large increases in developing countries.
No scenarios have been implemented yet, but IMAGE-GNM results for the 20th century show that the global river N export (19 to 37 Tg/yr, or +90%) showed a faster increase than P export (2 to 4 Tg/yr or +75%). The increase in export by rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (3.7 to 14.7 Tg N/yr, increase by a factor of 4; 0.6 to 1.6 Tg P/yr, factor of 1.5) and Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (0.9 to 2.1 Tg N/yr, +126%; 0.2 to 0.4 Tg P per year, +80% ) was much faster than in other parts of the world (the figure below). The increase in P export was smaller than that of N in world regions. The differential increase of N and P explains the increase in the N:P ratio in rivers draining into the Pacific Ocean (13 to 20), Indian Ocean (14 to 18 since 1970), Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea (10 to 13). There was no clear increase in the regions draining into the Atlantic Ocean.
[[|none|px|alt=|link=File:054x img13.png]]... further results
[[|none|px|alt=|link=Template:!]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=<]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=-5D-5D-26quot-5D-5D/link=none/sep=]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=.-3C-2Fli-3E-3C-2Ful-3E-3C-2Fspan-3E-3C-2Fspan-3E-5D-5D/link=none/sep=]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:001i rpg13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:001s img13-zondertekst.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:001s img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:002s img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:003s img13.pdf]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:003s img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:004s img13 600px.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:004s img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:005k img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:007g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:007x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:009g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:009x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:011g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:011x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:013g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:013x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:015g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:017g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:017x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:020s img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:021s img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:022s img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:022x svc13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:023g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:023x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:024g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:024x img13.PNG]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:024x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:028s img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:029g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:032g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:032x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:034s img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:036g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:036x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:043g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:043x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:045x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:047g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:047x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:051g img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:051x img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:053s img13.png]] [[|none|px|alt=|link=File:054g img13.png]]
Economic developments and policy interventions may modify individual terms in the soil nutrient budget (Formula 1, Model description part), and the fate of nutrients in the environment. For example, agricultural demand (Component Agricultural economy) affects:
- production of leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) and biological N fixation as a consequence;
- meat and milk production and thus animal manure production;
- crop production and fertiliser use.
The IMAGE soil nutrient model includes options to reduce nutrient surpluses in agriculture or nutrients in wastewater, and strategies to improve resource use efficiency. Wastewater strategies that can be assessed with tools available in the nutrient model of IMAGE include:
- Increasing access to improved sanitation and connection to sewerage systems;
- Construction of wastewater treatment plants;
- Substituting synthetic fertilisers with fertilisers produced from human excreta. This option has no consequences for nutrient budgets, but reduces wastewater flows.
IMAGE also addresses strategies for reducing nutrient surpluses in agriculture, including the five options illustrated in the figure below:
- Extensification (EX), assuming for example that 10% of ruminant production in mixed and industrial systems shifts to pastoral production systems.
- Increased feed conversion efficiency (FE), assuming for example 10% reduction in N and P excretion for cattle, pigs, poultry and small ruminants in mixed and industrial systems. This is achieved by increasing the use of concentrates.
- Improved manure storage systems (ST), considering for example 20% lower NH3 emissions from animal housing and storage systems. This means that the animal manure used for spreading contains 5% more N than under the baseline scenario.
- Integrated manure management (IM) where, for example, all manure under the baseline scenario ends up outside the agricultural system (e.g., manure used as fuel, see the figure above) and is recycled in crop systems to substitute fertiliser. In addition, integration of animal manure in crop systems is improved, particularly in industrialised countries.
- Dietary changes (DI), for example, assume that by 2050, 10% of beef consumption under the baseline scenarios is replaced by poultry meat in all producing regions, without accounting for changes in agricultural trade.
Extensification, increased feed efficiency and reduced ammonia emissions from stables (cases EX, FE and ST) have minor effects on the global soil N budget (the figure below). However, better integration of animal manure in crop production systems (IM), primarily in industrialised countries, and a change in the human diet with poultry replacing ruminant meat (DI) would have major effects on the global soil N budget.
Other options that can be assessed using scenario variables from other parts of IMAGE include:
- Consequences of changes in crop production systems, such as increasing crop yields, that would improve fertiliser use efficiency;
- Consequences of changes in livestock production systems such as better management leading to lower excretion rates;
- Changes in the distribution of total production between mixed and pastoral systems;
- Changing human diets leading to changing production volumes.
See also Policy interventions Table below
Effects of policy interventions on this component
|Changes in consumption and diet preferences||Interventions that target consumption changes or changes in dietary preferences (Reference: Stehfest et al., 2013)||Dietary changes, for example assumes that by 2050 10% of the baseline scenario’s beef consumption is replaced by poultry meat in all producing regions, without accounting for changes in agricultural trade|
|Changes in crop and livestock production systems||General changes in crop and livestock production systems, e.g. more efficient production methods to create higher production per unit of input, or other systems like organic farming||intervention may be increased fertilizer use, or fertilizer use efficiency ...|
|Improved manure storage (*)||Improved manure storage systems (ST), considering 20% lower NH3 emissions from animal housing and storage systems.||This means that the animal manure that is used for spreading contains 5% more N than under the baseline scenario.|
|Improvement of feed conversion||Improvement of feed conversion ratio of small ruminants, such as sheep and goats. This means other breeds will be used that need less grass to produce the same amount of meat.||The increased use of concentrates effects the height of N and P excretion for cattle, pigs, poultry and small ruminants in mixed and industrial systems. In this example a 10% lower N and P excretion has been assumed.|
|Integrated manure management (*)||Better integration of manure in crop production systems. This consists of recycling of manure that under the baseline scenario ends up outside the agricultural system (e.g. manure used as fuel), in crop systems to substitute fertiliser. In addition, there is improved integration of animal manure in crop systems, particularly in industrialised countries.||This change causes more nutrients to be available for recycling in agriculture, and take nutrients in the manure into account when determining of the nutrient application rates|
|Intensification/extensification of livestock systems||A change in the distribution of the production over pastoral and mixed systems; usually to a larger share of the production in mixed systems, which inherently changes the overall feed conversion ratios of ruminants.||Generally leads to a reduction of overall emissions (e.g. CH4) and reduction of overall nutrient excretion; however, it will generally also lead to an increase of ammonia (NH3) emissions from manure storage and spreading of manure|
|Sanitation measures (*)||Increase the access to improved sanitation, and connection to sewage systems; institution of wastewater treatment installations; recycling of human waste for substitution of synthetic fertilisers.||This option has no consequences for nutrient budgets. Connection of inhabitants to sewage systems concentrates nutrient flows and generally leads to increasing pollution of surface water if not combined with wastewater treatment; Treatment results in a reduction of nutrient discharge.|