Energy conversion/Description: Difference between revisions

From IMAGE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate
{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate
|Status=On hold
|Status=On hold
|Reference=Hoogwijk, 2004; Van Vuuren, 2007; Hendriks et al., 2004b;
|Reference=Hoogwijk, 2004; Van Vuuren, 2007; Hendriks et al., 2004b; Van Ruijven et al., 2007;  
|Description=The [[TIMER model]] includes two energy conversion submodels: the electric power generation model and the hydrogen generation model. Here, the focus is on a description of the electric power generation model (The flowdiagram on the right also shows only the electricity model). The hydrogen model follows a similar structure, and its key characteristics are briefly discussed in this Section.  
|Description=The [[TIMER model]] includes two energy conversion submodels: the electric power generation model and the hydrogen generation model. Here, the focus is on a description of the electric power generation model (The flowdiagram on the right also shows only the electricity model). The hydrogen model follows a similar structure, and its key characteristics are briefly discussed in this Section.  


Line 32: Line 32:
{{FormulaTemplate|Formula1_ED}}
{{FormulaTemplate|Formula1_ED}}


The costs of solar and wind power are the model determinedby learning and depletion dynamics. For renewable energy, costs relate to capital, O&M and system integration. The capital costs mostly relate to learning and depletion processes (learning is depicted in learning curves, see Box X; depletion is shown in cost–supply curves).  
The costs of solar and wind power are the model determinedby learning and depletion dynamics. For renewable energy, costs relate to capital, O&M and system integration. The capital costs mostly relate to learning and depletion processes (learning is depicted in learning curves, ******see Box X; depletion is shown in cost–supply curves).  


The additional system integration costs relate to 1) discarded electricity in cases where production exceeds demand and the overcapacity cannot be used within the system, 2) back-up capacity, and 3) additional, required spinning reserve. The two last items are needed to avoid loss of power if the supply of wind or solar power suddenly drops, enabling a power scale up in a relatively short time, in power stations operating below maximum capacity ([[Hoogwijk, 2004]]).
The additional system integration costs relate to 1) discarded electricity in cases where production exceeds demand and the overcapacity cannot be used within the system, 2) back-up capacity, and 3) additional, required spinning reserve. The two last items are needed to avoid loss of power if the supply of wind or solar power suddenly drops, enabling a power scale up in a relatively short time, in power stations operating below maximum capacity ([[Hoogwijk, 2004]]).
Line 43: Line 43:


==Hydrogen generation model==
==Hydrogen generation model==
The structure of the hydrogen model is similar to that of the electric power model (Van Ruijven et al., 2007). There are, however, some important differences:
The structure of the hydrogen model is similar to that of the electric power model ([[Van Ruijven et al., 2007]]). There are, however, some important differences:
*The hydrogen model distinguishes the following 11 supply options: hydrogen production plants on the basis of coal, oil, natural gas and bio-energy, with and  
*The hydrogen model distinguishes the following 11 supply options: hydrogen production plants on the basis of coal, oil, natural gas and bio-energy, with and  
without carbon capture and storage (8 plants), hydrogen production from electrolysis, direct hydrogen production from solar thermal processes, and, finally, small methane reform plants.  
without carbon capture and storage (8 plants), hydrogen production from electrolysis, direct hydrogen production from solar thermal processes, and, finally, small methane reform plants.  

Revision as of 15:09, 9 December 2013