Nutrients/Policy issues: Difference between revisions

From IMAGE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Text replace - "Roads from Rio+20 (2012)" to "Roads from Rio+20 (2012) project")
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ComponentPolicyIssueTemplate
{{ComponentPolicyIssueTemplate
|Description=Under the baseline scenario of the [[Roads from Rio+20 (2012)|Rio+20 study]], N surpluses increase by 35% globally, which is the result of decreasing trends in North America, western Europe and Japan, and stabilisation in India; in all other regions, N surpluses increase (See figure below). This increase is particularly large in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. For phosphorus we see a similar picture, with large increases in developing countries.
|Description=Under the baseline scenario of the [[Roads from Rio+20 (2012) project|Rio+20 study]], N surpluses increase by 35% globally, which is the result of decreasing trends in North America, western Europe and Japan, and stabilisation in India; in all other regions, N surpluses increase (See figure below). This increase is particularly large in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. For phosphorus we see a similar picture, with large increases in developing countries.
Several different economic developments and policy interventions may modify individual terms in the soil nutrient budget ([[Equation 1]]), and the fate of nutrients in the environment. For example, agricultural demand affects:
Several different economic developments and policy interventions may modify individual terms in the soil nutrient budget ([[Equation 1]]), and the fate of nutrients in the environment. For example, agricultural demand affects:
* the production of leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) and biological N fixation as a consequence;
* the production of leguminous crops (pulses and soybeans) and biological N fixation as a consequence;

Revision as of 15:46, 13 January 2014