Land-use allocation/Description: Difference between revisions

From IMAGE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate
{{ComponentDescriptionTemplate
|Description=IMAGE 3.0 has two methods to represent land-use dynamics and to determine the location of new agricultural lands. For applications not focusing on land-use dynamics, a simple regression-based suitability assessment is used to determine future land-use patterns. A dynamic link to CLUMondo (Van Asselen and Verburg, 2013) enables more detailed representation of land-use systems and their dynamics. Both approaches are embedded in the IMAGE land-use allocation model (see flowchart).  
|Description=IMAGE 3.0 has two methods to represent land-use dynamics and to determine the location of new agricultural lands. For applications not focusing on land-use dynamics, a simple regression-based suitability assessment is used to determine future land-use patterns. A dynamic link to CLUMondo ([[Van Asselen and Verburg, 2013]]) enables more detailed representation of land-use systems and their dynamics. Both approaches are embedded in the IMAGE land-use allocation model (see flowchart).  


Both approaches are driven by regional crop and grassland production and their respective intensity levels, as calculated by the IMAGE agro-economic model ([[Agricultural economy and forestry]]). Agricultural land use is allocated to grid cells in an iterative process until the required regional production of crops and grass is met. Land use in IMAGE is modelled using dominant land use per grid cell on a 5 x 5 minute resolution, distinguishing extensive grasslands, agricultural and non-agricultural grid cells, and within agricultural land areas fractions of grass, seven rain-fed and seven irrigated crop types, and bioenergy crops.
Both approaches are driven by regional crop and grassland production and their respective intensity levels, as calculated by the IMAGE agro-economic model ([[Agricultural economy and forestry]]). Agricultural land use is allocated to grid cells in an iterative process until the required regional production of crops and grass is met. Land use in IMAGE is modelled using dominant land use per grid cell on a 5 x 5 minute resolution, distinguishing extensive grasslands, agricultural and non-agricultural grid cells, and within agricultural land areas fractions of grass, seven rain-fed and seven irrigated crop types, and bioenergy crops.
Line 39: Line 39:
CLUMondo is dynamically linked to IMAGE, and the change in land systems can be used as an additional suitability criterion. Fractions of crops and intensive grasslands from CLUMondo are re-arranged in 30 minutes grid cells to dominant 5 minutes crop cells, which are then given a very high suitability ranking in IMAGE to ensure these cells are converted first. In this way, IMAGE follows the dynamics of CLUMondo in terms of location of new or abandoned agricultural land, and tries to make agricultural areas and agricultural expansion in IMAGE and CLUMondo consistent on a 30 x 30 minutes resolution.
CLUMondo is dynamically linked to IMAGE, and the change in land systems can be used as an additional suitability criterion. Fractions of crops and intensive grasslands from CLUMondo are re-arranged in 30 minutes grid cells to dominant 5 minutes crop cells, which are then given a very high suitability ranking in IMAGE to ensure these cells are converted first. In this way, IMAGE follows the dynamics of CLUMondo in terms of location of new or abandoned agricultural land, and tries to make agricultural areas and agricultural expansion in IMAGE and CLUMondo consistent on a 30 x 30 minutes resolution.


Currently, IMAGE is not using the endogenous intensification calculated by CLUMondo ([[Van Asselen and Verburg, 2013]]) because it is not necessarily consistent and is mostly lower than the intensification calculated by the agro-economic model ([[Agricultural economy and forestry
Currently, IMAGE is not using the endogenous intensification calculated by CLUMondo ([[Van Asselen and Verburg, 2013]]) because it is not necessarily consistent and is mostly lower than the intensification calculated by the agro-economic model ([[Agricultural economy and forestry]]). At a later stage, intensification in IMAGE and CLUMondo could be made consistent via iterations or closer linkages. For similar reasons, grassland dynamics are not taken from CLUMondo but from the [[Livestock|IMAGE livestock]] and [[Agricultural economy and forestry|agro-economic models]].
]]). At a later stage, intensification in IMAGE and CLUMondo could be made consistent via iterations or closer linkages. For similar reasons, grassland dynamics are not taken from CLUMondo but from the [[Livestock|IMAGE livestock]] and [[Agricultural economy and forestry|agro-economic models]].
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:07, 5 May 2014