Agricultural economy/Data uncertainties limitations: Difference between revisions

From IMAGE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


===Uncertainties===
===Uncertainties===
Systematic uncertainty analyses of models on the agricultural economy, including the MAGNET model, to date, have not been conducted. A comparison between the LEITAP (now MAGNET) and IMPACT models revealed large differences in model results, even more in policy scenarios than in baseline projections ([[Stehfest et al., 2013]]). A recent model intercomparison within [[AgMIP]] included 10 global agro-economic models, using harmonised scenario drivers. Preliminary results from this comparison indicate that MAGNET is in the upper range of other models, in terms of future land-use expansion ([[Von Lampe, et al., unpublished]], [[Nelson et al., unpublished]]). This is probably due to the rather large land supply in MAGNET, which allows further expansion of agricultural land, most notably in North and South America and Africa. In contrast, several other models do not explicitly consider agricultural land expansion, but only allow interchanges between, for example, arable land and grassland. In addition to land supply, the most relevant uncertainties in the MAGNET model are those of autonomous technological change, relative contribution of intensification or expansion to total production growth, retaining current trade patterns in long-term scenarios, dynamics in the livestock sector, especially with respect to pasture area and grassland intensification (Stehfest et al. 2013), and long-term dietary preferences. The poor empirical basis of many of these parameters in MAGNET and all other agro-economic models needs to be improved ([[Hertel, 2011]]).
Systematic uncertainty analyses of models on the agricultural economy, including the MAGNET model, to date, have not been conducted. A comparison between the LEITAP (now MAGNET) and IMPACT models revealed large differences in model results, even more in policy scenarios than in baseline projections ([[Stehfest et al., 2013]]). A recent model intercomparison within [[AgMIP]] included 10 global agro-economic models, using harmonised scenario drivers. Preliminary results from this comparison indicate that MAGNET is in the upper range of other models, in terms of future land-use expansion ([[Von Lampe, et al., (unpublished)]], [[Nelson et al., (unpublished)]]). This is probably due to the rather large land supply in MAGNET, which allows further expansion of agricultural land, most notably in North and South America and Africa. In contrast, several other models do not explicitly consider agricultural land expansion, but only allow interchanges between, for example, arable land and grassland. In addition to land supply, the most relevant uncertainties in the MAGNET model are those of autonomous technological change, relative contribution of intensification or expansion to total production growth, retaining current trade patterns in long-term scenarios, dynamics in the livestock sector, especially with respect to pasture area and grassland intensification ([[Stehfest et al. 2013]]), and long-term dietary preferences. The poor empirical basis of many of these parameters in MAGNET and all other agro-economic models needs to be improved ([[Hertel, 2011]]).


===Limitations===
===Limitations===
The MAGNET model provides a complete and internally consistent picture of the world economy, covering all economic sectors, and a dynamic modelling of all primary and intermediate production and demand. One important limitation, which is hardly known, is the uncertainties in constructing the GTAP\MAGNET database, as many ad-hoc assumptions need to be made in order to fill the database; for example, on allocating value added between different inputs. Furthermore, the volumes in the model are not expressed in physical terms but in monetary values. Likewise, all substitutions in the model are on the basis of monetary values. As a consequence, there is no  guarantee that changes in composition are consistent with the physical requirements, such as in livestock feed, and therefore a closer link to physical units is necessary (Woltjer, 2011). Because of the highly aggregated and general character of MAGNET, most elasticities are kept constant over time, though some improvements have been introduced in the consumption function. Armington elasticities are also constant, and therefore trade flows that are small in the starting year will never become large in the future. Although some of these limitations can be improved in the future by adding physical units and improving the empirical basis for the most important elasticities, many simplifications in agro-economic models will remain. The MAGNET model provides a consistent system to assess economy-wide effects of policy measures on land use, income, welfare and production, and helps policy makers and scientists to think about these complex interlinkages, but the simplifications and uncertainties that come with such a broad coverage need to be kept in mind when interpreting results.
The MAGNET model provides a complete and internally consistent picture of the world economy, covering all economic sectors, and a dynamic modelling of all primary and intermediate production and demand. One important limitation, which is hardly known, is the uncertainties in constructing the GTAP\MAGNET database, as many ad-hoc assumptions need to be made in order to fill the database; for example, on allocating value added between different inputs. Furthermore, the volumes in the model are not expressed in physical terms but in monetary values. Likewise, all substitutions in the model are on the basis of monetary values. As a consequence, there is no  guarantee that changes in composition are consistent with the physical requirements, such as in livestock feed, and therefore a closer link to physical units is necessary ([[Woltjer, 2011]]). Because of the highly aggregated and general character of MAGNET, most elasticities are kept constant over time, though some improvements have been introduced in the consumption function. Armington elasticities are also constant, and therefore trade flows that are small in the starting year will never become large in the future. Although some of these limitations can be improved in the future by adding physical units and improving the empirical basis for the most important elasticities, many simplifications in agro-economic models will remain. The MAGNET model provides a consistent system to assess economy-wide effects of policy measures on land use, income, welfare and production, and helps policy makers and scientists to think about these complex interlinkages, but the simplifications and uncertainties that come with such a broad coverage need to be kept in mind when interpreting results.
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:10, 9 December 2013